Stop and Frisks Plummeted Under New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, but Racial Disparities Haven’t Budged
Stops dropped a reported 98 percent under New York’s current mayor, but people of color are still disproportionately targeted by police.
Michelle Shames, Data & Research Strategist, New York Civil Liberties Union & Simon McCormack, Staff Writer, New York Civil Liberties Union; Contributing Writer, Speak Freely | MARCH 14, 2019 | 4:00 PM
We’ve come a long way since 2011.
That year, New York Police Department officers made nearly 700,000 stops as part of then-Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s aggressive and controversial stop-and-frisk program. Six years later in 2017, under current-Mayor Bill de Blasio, the NYPD reported 11,629 stops, a 98 percent decrease from 2011.
Though the NYCLU believes the actual number of stops is considerably higher because officers are failing to document many stops, current stop activity undoubtedly is a small fraction of what was occurring during the Bloomberg years.
One of the keys to this dramatic decline was transparency. In 2007, the New York Civil Liberties Union successfully sued to get access to the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk database, which contained information about the stops that were taking place and who was being stopped. Then in 2012, we released a report analyzing NYPD stop-and-frisk activity in 2011 with a level of detail never before available to the public.
We reported, for example, that though young Black and Latino males between the ages of 14 and 24 accounted for only 4.7 percent of the city’s population, they accounted for 41.6 percent of stops in 2011. The number of stops of young Black men exceeded the entire city population of young Black men (168,126 as compared to 158,406). And 90 percent of young Black and Latino men stopped were innocent.
That report helped push stop-and-frisk to the forefront of the unfolding campaigns to replace Bloomberg. One candidate who embraced stop-and-frisk reform was then-Public Advocate de Blasio, who at the time was considered a long-shot candidate.
By the time de Blasio took office in November 2013, public pressure had forced Bloomberg and his Police Commissioner Ray Kelly to start curtailing stop-and frisks. Three lawsuits, including one led by the NYCLU, laid the ground work for reducing stops further.
As stops have receded, crime in New York City has dropped significantly, with 2018 seeing the lowest number of recorded homicides in nearly 70 years. New York’s experience proves, unequivocally, that police do not have to stop hundreds of thousands of innocent people to bring down crime.
Even though the NYPD is now stopping far fewer people, our new report, which analyzes stops during de Blasio’s first term in office, highlights serious problems that remain with the current incarnation of stop-and-frisk.
For example, young Black and Latino males continue to bear the brunt of the city’s stop-and-frisk activity. Though they make up just 5 percent of the city’s population, young black and Latino males between the ages of 14 and 24 comprised 38 percent of reported stops between 2014 and 2017. Under Bloomberg, between 2002 and 2013, Black and Latino males between the ages of 14 and 24 accounted for 41 percent of stops between 2003 and 2013. Under both administrations, the vast majority of young Black and Latino males stopped were innocent.
Black and Latino people were also more likely to be frisked than whites. Yet, among all those frisked, Black and Latino people less likely to be found with a weapon under both administrations. And regardless of neighborhood, precinct, or administration, young Black and Latino males feel the disproportionate impact of stop-and-frisk.
It’s worth keeping these statistics in mind as de Blasio continues to cling to the ideology of “broken windows” policing, which posits that cracking down on minor misbehavior helps curtail more serious crimes. In practice, this philosophy continues to disrupt and destroy thousands of Black and Latino lives throughout New York City.
Aggressive stop-and-frisk practices are an ugly manifestation of “broken windows.” And while we don’t want to undersell just how important the huge drop in stops is, we also know that we won’t have just policing until “broken windows” is abandoned completely.
Originally published at www.aclu.org.