Photo by Raimond Klavins on Unsplash

On Adaptive Organization

From Ecosystem Dynamics to Organizational Excellence

The term “adaptive” encapsulates an array of concepts that are critical to the emerging capabilities of any given entity, denoted by its ability to learn from past experiences, to progress iteratively through the reapplication and reuse of amassed knowledge, and to form symbiotic affiliations with other entities within a specific environment. Notably, these entities also exhibit intelligent behavior both on individual and collective scales, further enhancing their adaptability.

Entities that exhibit adaptive characteristics are not merely inert constituents of their environment. Rather, they actively partake in and flourish through their contributions to the creation and sustenance of comprehensive ecosystems. They also demonstrate a capacity for long-term sustainability, striking a balance between order and structure and the degree of freedom and redundancy of processes. This balance facilitates resilience and flexibility, allowing these entities to respond effectively to changes and uncertainties in the environment.

Understanding adaptiveness in its entirety necessitates a thorough investigation into ecosystem dynamics. The concept of biomimicry, or the emulation of living organisms, has been implemented across a spectrum of fields, including but not limited to engineering and architecture. However, the complexity of the natural environment often presents formidable challenges in comprehension and management.

The scientific community has seen a marked increase in interest in areas such as complex adaptive systems and self-organization, as these fields offer potential pathways to navigate the complexities of natural environments. To develop a model that adequately describes and replicates adaptive behavior, it is paramount to isolate, define, and frame the relationships between these concepts, thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of adaptive phenomena and facilitating their application in a variety of practical contexts.

Openness in Adaptive Organizations

Openness, in the context of adaptive organizations, can be conceptualized as the free flow and exchange of information, resources, and ideas between entities. Openness is paramount for adaptability since it facilitates knowledge sharing, fosters collaboration, and allows for the inclusion of diverse perspectives, thereby ensuring robust responses to dynamic challenges.

1. Principles of Openness in Adaptive Organizations:

a. Transparency: Organizations should be transparent about their operations, decisions, and information. This not only fosters trust but also allows stakeholders to understand and contribute meaningfully.

b. Collaboration: Open systems value and prioritize collective intelligence. They recognize that solutions can often emerge from the collective rather than individual silos.

c. Decentralization: Adaptive organizations decentralize decision-making processes, ensuring faster response times and empowering individual entities to act based on local knowledge.

2. Practical Examples of Embracing Openness:

a. Open Source Software (OSS): Projects like Linux and Apache are testaments to the power of openness. These projects, driven by a community of global developers, have created software that rivals, and in many cases surpasses, proprietary alternatives.

b. Wikipedia: A collaborative effort where users from around the world contribute to creating and maintaining a massive online encyclopedia. It’s an example of how openness and collaboration can lead to a rich, continuously updated resource.

c. Publicly Funded Research: Scientific communities have been pushing for publicly funded research to be openly accessible. This ensures that discoveries are not locked behind paywalls but are available to further scientific progress.

d. Open Innovation: Companies like Tesla have opened up their patents to the public. Elon Musk stated that Tesla’s true competition is not the small trickle of non-Tesla electric cars but the vast flood of gasoline cars. This move facilitates a faster transition to sustainable energy.

3. Openness at a Societal Scale:

Entire societies can also benefit from embracing openness. For instance:

a. Public Data Initiatives: Many governments are making data openly available to the public, fostering transparency, and allowing citizens and businesses to leverage this data for insights and innovation.

b. Education: Open courseware initiatives by institutions like MIT allow anyone with an internet connection to access high-quality educational resources, democratizing education.

c. Healthcare: Open access to medical research, especially in critical areas like pandemics, allows for rapid global collaboration and response.

Embracing openness is an essential attribute for adaptive organizations and societies. It facilitates a free flow of knowledge, resources, and ideas, fostering innovation, resilience, and adaptability. While challenges like data privacy and intellectual property rights need careful navigation, the overarching principle remains: an open system is often a more adaptive, resilient, and vibrant one.

Autonomy in Adaptive Organizations

Autonomy, when viewed through the lens of adaptability, is the ability of entities, whether individuals or collective organizations, to operate independently, make decisions, and act based on their acquired knowledge. It underscores the importance of learning and iterating from experiences, both successes and failures, and then making choices that align with an entity’s overarching purpose or mission. This independence fosters innovation, self-correction, and the potential for swift action.

1. Principles of Autonomy in Adaptive Organizations:

a. Self-Direction: Autonomy is underpinned by the principle of self-direction. This implies that entities have the freedom to chart their own course based on their accumulated knowledge and insights.

b. Empowerment: It is crucial to empower individuals or teams by providing them with the requisite resources and tools to make informed decisions.

c. Trust: An environment of trust is imperative. Organizations need to trust in the ability of their autonomous units to make decisions and likewise, those units need to trust that they will be supported.

2. Practical Examples of Embracing Autonomy:

a. Agile Methodologies in Software Development: Agile frameworks, such as Scrum, emphasize autonomous teams that are empowered to make decisions about how they work and what they work on based on iterative feedback and learnings.

b. Spotify’s Squad Structure: Spotify famously implemented a team structure where squads (small teams) have autonomy in terms of how they achieve their objectives, fostering innovation and faster problem solving.

c. Toyota’s Production System: Toyota empowered its front-line workers to halt the production line if they identified a quality issue. This level of autonomy ensured that quality was maintained at all stages of production.

d. Holacracy: Companies like Zappos have experimented with Holacracy, a system where there are no traditional managers and teams organize themselves around the work, promoting high degrees of autonomy.

3. Autonomy at a Societal Scale:

Entire societies can also benefit from promoting autonomy, especially when it’s intertwined with learning:

a. Decentralized Education Systems: Finland’s education system, for instance, grants teachers a high degree of autonomy in curriculum decisions. Trusting teachers as professionals, it believes they know best how to impart knowledge based on the unique needs of their students.

b. Citizen Science Projects: These are initiatives where the general public, not just scientists, can contribute to scientific data collection and analysis. It democratizes knowledge gathering and fosters a culture of learning.

c. Local Governance: Some countries emphasize local governance where decisions are made at the community level rather than centrally. This autonomy ensures decisions are more aligned with local needs.

Autonomy, especially when combined with a purposeful approach to learning, is a powerful attribute for adaptive organizations and societies. While there’s a balance to strike to ensure that autonomy doesn’t result in fragmentation or misalignment, when done right, it can lead to remarkable innovation, resilience, and adaptability. The key lies in fostering an environment of trust, continuous learning, and clear communication of purpose and objectives.

Symbiotic Behavior in Adaptive Organizations

Symbiotic behavior represents a form of mutualistic interaction where distinct entities come together, leveraging their unique attributes to create an outcome greater than the sum of their individual capacities. In the realm of adaptive organizations, embracing such behavior means fostering partnerships and collaborative efforts that drive shared success.

1. Principles of Symbiotic Behavior in Adaptive Organizations:

a. Complementarity: For symbiosis to be effective, the collaborating entities should possess attributes or capabilities that complement each other.

b. Mutual Benefit: The relationship should confer benefits to all involved parties, ensuring sustained engagement.

c. Dynamic Interaction: As the external environment changes, the nature of the symbiotic relationship may need to evolve.

2. Practical Examples of Embracing Symbiotic Behavior:

a. Human-Machine Collaboration: Modern manufacturing often involves collaborative robots (cobots) that work alongside humans. While machines offer precision and consistency, humans bring creativity and problem-solving skills. Together, they optimize production processes.

b. Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): Governments and private entities collaborate, with the former bringing regulatory support and the latter providing innovation and efficiency. Infrastructure projects are commonly built on PPP models.

c. Technology Ecosystems: Apple’s App Store or Google’s Play Store thrive because of a symbiotic relationship. Developers create apps that enrich the platform, drawing more users, and in turn, Apple or Google provides developers with a vast customer base.

d. Agriculture & Biocontrol: Farmers often use beneficial insects, like ladybugs, to control pests. This reduces the need for chemical pesticides while ensuring the ladybugs have a consistent food source.

3. Symbiotic Behavior at a Societal Scale:

Symbiotic relationships are not limited to businesses; they span societies:

a. Urban Ecology: Cities incorporate green spaces that support local wildlife, improving residents’ quality of life, and offering habitats for various species.

b. Cross-disciplinary Research: Interdisciplinary research teams from diverse fields, say biology and computer science, collaborate to address complex problems like simulating biological processes on computers.

c. Community Supported Agriculture (CSA): Local residents invest in a farm’s operation at the beginning of the growing season. In return, they receive shares of the farm’s output. This ensures farmers have upfront capital and residents get fresh, local produce.

d. Integrated Human-AI Decision Making: In sectors like healthcare, AI tools can analyze vast datasets to recommend treatments, but the final decision often relies on a human doctor’s judgment.

Symbiotic behavior in adaptive organizations underscores the importance of mutualistic collaboration. Whether it’s humans working seamlessly with machines, diverse teams converging to solve complex problems, or different sectors collaborating for societal benefit, the principle remains: by combining diverse strengths in a cohesive manner, we can navigate complexities more effectively and create more resilient and adaptive systems. Recognizing and fostering these relationships can lead to innovation, enhanced resilience, and sustainability in the ever-evolving landscape of our interconnected world.

Intelligence in Adaptive Organizations

Intelligence, in the context of adaptive organizations, transcends the simple capacity to think and reason. It amalgamates individual cognition, collective wisdom, and the computational prowess of artificial intelligence (AI) to shape a holistic capability for understanding, decision-making, and adaptation. The synthesis of these forms of intelligence allows organizations and societies to better anticipate challenges, optimize resources, and innovate.

1. Principles of Intelligence in Adaptive Organizations:

a. Synergy: The intersection of individual, collective, and artificial intelligence should be harmonized to ensure the smooth flow of information and insights.

b. Evolutionary Learning: Intelligence should be viewed as an evolving entity, constantly refining itself based on feedback and new data.

c. Inclusivity: For collective intelligence to be genuinely representative, a diverse set of voices and perspectives should be embraced.

2. Practical Examples of Embracing Intelligence:

a. Collaborative Decision-Making Platforms: Tools like Loomio allow groups to discuss, deliberate, and decide collectively, ensuring decisions benefit from the group’s collective wisdom.

b. AI-enhanced Medical Diagnostics: Radiologists use AI to help detect anomalies in X-rays. The machine provides rapid, precise analysis, while the human doctor brings experience and context to the diagnosis.

c. Crowdsourcing Platforms: Platforms like Wikipedia or Stack Exchange rely on the collective intelligence of a global community to create and refine content.

d. Smart Cities: Urban centers harness AI to analyze traffic patterns, energy consumption, and public services usage. Such insights, combined with citizen feedback, help optimize city planning and resource allocation.

3. Intelligence at a Societal Scale:

When entire societies harness the combined powers of individual, collective, and artificial intelligence, transformative changes ensue:

a. Citizen Science Projects: Platforms like Zooniverse allow the general public to participate in scientific research, blending individual contributions with AI analysis to produce novel insights.

b. Open Source Movements: Communities around open-source software, like Linux, combine individual coding expertise, collective decision-making on features, and AI tools for tasks like bug detection.

c. E-Governance and Direct Democracy: Some regions are experimenting with platforms that allow citizens to voice opinions on legislative matters, combining individual inputs, collective voting, and AI-driven analysis of societal needs.

d. Integrated Education Systems: AI-driven platforms, such as Khan Academy or Duolingo, adjust to individual learning speeds, while educators provide the human touch, and the broader educational community contributes to content creation and refinement.

Intelligence in adaptive organizations is a multifaceted force. When the acuity of the individual, the wisdom of the crowd, and the analytical might of AI are harmoniously aligned, organizations and societies not only adapt but thrive. The key is fostering environments where these forms of intelligence can interact, learn from each other, and evolve, resulting in adaptive systems that are poised to navigate the intricacies and unpredictabilities of the future.

Sustainable Behavior in Adaptive Organizations

Embracing sustainability, when framed within ecosystem science, calls for an intricate dance between preserving inherent structures and processes and permitting the freedom and redundancy that foster adaptability. This perspective integrates the lessons from nature, emphasizing the need to strike a balance in organizational and societal dynamics to remain within a window of viability. In other words, just as ecosystems thrive through a delicate equilibrium of order and flexibility, organizations and societies should too.

1. Principles of Sustainable Behavior in Adaptive Organizations:

a. Dynamic Stability: Recognizing that stability doesn’t mean stagnancy. Systems should be stable yet dynamic, capable of evolving in response to changing circumstances.

b. Diverse Redundancy: Diversifying resources, knowledge bases, and processes to ensure backup options, increasing resilience without creating unnecessary overlap.

c. Cyclical Processes: Mimicking nature’s cycles, where waste becomes a resource, ensures long-term sustainability and reduces resource depletion.

d. Feedback Loops: Regular feedback processes to adjust strategies and operations based on the results of previous actions, ensuring constant refinement and adjustment.

2. Practical Examples of Embracing Sustainable Behavior:

a. Circular Economy Models: Companies like Patagonia repair, reuse, recycle, and resell their products, embodying a cyclical approach to production and consumption.

b. Urban Farming Initiatives: Cities integrating farming within their confines, such as the “Gardens by the Bay” in Singapore, balance urban development with ecological sustainability.

c. Decentralized Renewable Energy Systems: Decentralizing power production using solar or wind microgrids provides redundancy, resilience, and flexibility.

d. Water Management in Arid Regions: Israel’s approach to water recycling and desalination strikes a balance between resource conservation and meeting the needs of its population and agriculture.

3. Sustainable Behavior at a Societal Scale:

Societies can manifest sustainable behaviors by fostering practices that align with ecosystem dynamics:

a. Community-Based Forest Management: Communities like those in Nepal have balanced conservation with economic needs by sustainably managing and profiting from local forests.

b. Adaptive Traffic Management Systems: Cities like Copenhagen and Amsterdam integrate real-time traffic data, public transport systems, and pedestrian movements to ensure smooth transportation flow, reducing congestion and pollution.

c. Open-Source Software Movement: This collaborative approach mimics ecosystem dynamics by allowing the freedom to modify and share software, ensuring adaptability and redundancy.

d. Cultural Traditions and Biodiversity: Indigenous communities, such as the Maori in New Zealand, integrate traditional knowledge with modern conservation techniques, ensuring the protection of both cultural heritage and biodiversity.

Sustainable behavior in adaptive organizations and societies requires a nuanced understanding of ecosystem dynamics. By observing, learning from, and integrating the principles of natural ecosystems, organizations and societies can build models that are not only adaptive and resilient but also geared towards long-term viability. The aim should always be to strike a harmonious balance between order and freedom, structure and flexibility, ensuring prosperity within the parameters of sustainability.

Adaptive Organization and the O.A.S.I.S. Model

As we traverse the landscape of organizational evolution, the concept of adaptiveness stands as a beacon, illuminating the way for entities desiring growth, resilience, and sustainability. The “adaptive” characteristic emphasizes not just mere survival, but the ability to learn, innovate, and contribute meaningfully to a larger ecosystem. In this intricate dance of adaptability, the O.A.S.I.S. model emerges as a profound framework.

• Open: Embracing openness heralds a new era of collaboration, connection, and fluid exchange of ideas and resources. It’s about breaking down barriers and seeing beyond the immediate environment.
• Autonomous: Autonomy underscores the importance of self-direction and purposeful learning. As entities evolve, they need the latitude to acquire and reuse knowledge, iterating upon past experiences for future growth.
• Symbiotic: The power of symbiotic affiliations is evident in nature’s ecosystems, where different species coexist, collaborate, and contribute to mutual well-being. When organizations, societies, and technology come together in a harmonious relationship, the results can be transformative.
• Intelligent: Intelligence, in this age, transcends the boundaries of human cognition. It’s a harmonious blend of individual insights, collective wisdom, and the unparalleled computational prowess of artificial intelligence. Together, they create a robust, informed, and responsive entity.
• Sustainable: Drawing from the lessons of ecosystem science, sustainability emphasizes the delicate equilibrium of order, flexibility, and redundancy. It’s not just about enduring; it’s about thriving without compromising future potential.

The O.A.S.I.S. model is more than just an acronym; it’s a blueprint for the future of organizations. It’s a testament to the possibility of building entities that are dynamic, resilient, and in harmony with the larger ecosystems they inhabit. As we stand on the cusp of unprecedented global challenges and opportunities, the principles encapsulated in this model can guide organizations and societies towards a future marked by adaptability, innovation, and sustainable prosperity.

Reference

1. Stacey, R. D. (2011). Strategic management and organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organisations. Pearson UK.
2. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual review of ecology and systematics
3. Levin, S. A. (1998). Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems
4. Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. William Morrow & Co.
5. Vincent, J. F., Bogatyreva, O. A., Bogatyrev, N. R., Bowyer, A., & Pahl, A. K. (2006). Biomimetics: its practice and theory. Journal of the Royal Society Interface
6. Holland, J. H. (2006). Studying complex adaptive systems. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity
7. Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization science
8. Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J. L., Franks, N. R., Sneyd, J., Theraulaz, G., & Bonabeau, E. (2003). Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton university press.
9. Dooley, K. J. (1997). A complex adaptive systems model of organization change. Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences
10. Bennis, W. (2009). Transparency: How Leaders Create a Culture of Candor. John Wiley & Sons.
11. Sawyer, K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. Basic Books.
12. Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. Penguin.
13. Raymond, E. S. (1999). The cathedral & the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open-source by an accidental revolutionary. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
14. Reagle, J. (2010). Good faith collaboration: The culture of Wikipedia. MIT press.
15. Willinsky, J. (2006). The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship. MIT press.
16. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
17. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information systems management
18. Caswell, T., Henson, S., Jensen, M., & Wiley, D. (2008). Open content and open educational resources: Enabling universal education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
19. Groves, P., Kayyali, B., Knott, D., & Van Kuiken, S. (2016). The big-data revolution in US health care: Accelerating value and innovation. McKinsey & Company.
20. Pink, D. H. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Canongate.
21. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of management review
22. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review
23. Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2002). Agile software development with Scrum. Prentice Hall.
24. Kniberg, H., & Ivarsson, A. (2012). Scaling Agile @ Spotify with Tribes, Squads, Chapters & Guilds. Unpublished paper, October, 30.
25. Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill.
26. Robertson, B. J. (2015). Holacracy: The new management system for a rapidly changing world. Henry Holt and Company.
27. Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland?. Teachers College Press.
28. Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience
29. Lyons, M., Smuts, C., & Stephens, A. (2001). Participation, empowerment and sustainability: (How) do the links work?. Urban Studies
30. Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make?. Administrative science quarterly
31. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review
32. Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of management review
33. Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370), 1530–1534.
34. Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. K. (2002). Evaluating the risks of public-private partnerships for infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management
35. Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Harvard Business Press.
36. Van Lenteren, J. C. (Ed.). (2012). IOBC Internet Book of Biological Control
37. Douglas, I. (2013). The Routledge handbook of urban ecology. Routledge.
38. Jeffrey, P. (2003). Smoothing the waters: observations on the process of cross-disciplinary research collaboration. Social Studies of Science
39. DeMuth, S. (1993). Defining community supported agriculture. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service.
40. Integrated Human-AI Decision Making:
41. Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review
42. Malone, T. W. (2018). Superminds: The Surprising Power of People and Computers Thinking Together. Little, Brown, and Company. This book explores the potential that arises when humans collaborate with computers.
43. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline. Doubleday/Currency. This seminal work delves into the concept of organizations as learning entities.
44. Page, S. E. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton University Press. The author provides a comprehensive argument for the power of diverse teams in problem-solving and innovation.
45. Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Basic Books. A look at how technology enables collaborative decision-making.
46. Rajpurkar, P., Irvin, J., Ball, R. L., Zhu, K., Yang, B., Mehta, H., … & Ng, A. Y. (2018). Deep learning for chest radiograph diagnosis: A retrospective comparison of the CheXNeXt algorithm to practicing radiologists. PLoS medicine
47. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. Anchor. A detailed exploration of how collective intelligence shapes decisions and outcomes.
48. Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., … & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518. An overview of how technology and intelligence are shaping modern urban centers.
49. Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience
50. Raymond, E. S. (2001). The cathedral & the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. O’Reilly Media, Inc. A look at the philosophy and dynamics behind open-source movements.
51. Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. This paper explores the implications and mechanisms of electronic participation in governance.
52. Woolf, B. P. (2010). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Morgan Kaufmann. An insight into AI-driven educational platforms and their interactions with learners and educators.
53. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. This report provides insights into circular economy principles and their benefits.
54. Gorgolewski, M., Komisar, J., & Nasr, J. (2011). Carrot city: Creating places for urban agriculture. The Monacelli Press. A dive into urban agriculture’s role in promoting sustainable cityscapes.
55. Lopes, J. A. P., Hatziargyriou, N., Mutale, J., Djapic, P., & Jenkins, N. (2007). Integrating distributed generation into electric power systems: A review of drivers, challenges and opportunities. Electric Power Systems Research
56. Tal, A. (2016). The land is full: Addressing overpopulation in Israel. Yale University Press. This book discusses Israel’s innovations in water management among other sustainability issues.
57. Agrawal, A., & Gupta, K. (2005). Decentralization and participation: The governance of common pool resources in Nepal’s Terai. World Development
58. Litman, T. (2018). Sustainable transportation indicators. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. An overview of sustainable transportation strategies, including adaptive traffic management.
59. Raymond, E. S. (2001). The cathedral & the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
60. Moller, H., Berkes, F., Lyver, P. O., & Kislalioglu, M. (2004). Combining science and traditional ecological knowledge: monitoring populations for co-management. Ecology and Society
61. Ulanowicz, R. E. (1986). Growth and development: Ecosystems phenomenology. Springer-Verlag
62. Ulanowicz, R. E., Goerner, S. J., Lietaer, B., & Gomez, R. (2009). Quantifying sustainability: Resilience, efficiency and the return of information theory. Ecological Complexity
63. Ulanowicz, R. E. (2004). On the nature of ecodynamics. Ecological Complexity
64. Ulanowicz, R. E., & Hannon, B. M. (1987). Life and the production of entropy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences