We interupt the news to bring you Quantum-Artists-Journalists

Dr. David Dunkley Gyimah
Feb 20 · 6 min read
Photo by Sitbonzo David Berman

Look around you. It’s more than likely whatever field you work in you can point to someone who’s the avant-garde, an outlier, an artist at their craft whom you and a few others admire. They are the visionaries whose work unbeknown to many, only in hindsight, signalled the future.

Television producer and art critic Robert Hughes sought to frame the work of this artist by saying “The essence of the avant-garde myth is that the artist is a precursor; the truly significant work of art is the one that prepares the future”.

They somehow see the future, yet for Hughes the rest of us are hemmed in by existing paradigms, when he says ‘The transitional focus of culture, on the other hand, tends to treat the present as the culmination of the past”.

All too often we look to an immediate past to make sense of the world we live in. Innovation in small leaps can find its trace elements in its 6'O clock shadow.

For the outlier, their innovation is unsighted. It happened with the Realists painters in the 18th century when they wanted to capture a broader tapestry of culture — ordinary life basically. One art critic compared Realist artist Gustav Courbet to manure, mucus and farts. Impressionism hence upended classic art. In literature, the first modern novel Madam Bovary by French writer Gustave Flaubert wasn’t just ridiculed but attacked by public prosecutors for its obscenities.

You don’t have to look all the way back in history either. Rap music and Queen Latifah, a woman breaking the mould. The founders of Black Lives Matter. Sure some people would have rolled their eyes when they heard they were looking to build a social movement. Whose rolling it now? Then there are the innovator — journalists.

LOOK INTO THE FUTURE

If you’re one of the new journalists filming on a mobile phone, congratulations and welcome, but the outliers, the avant-garde shaping the future are miles ahead of you, I tell an audience at one of London’s leading journalism venues The FrontLine Club.

How do you square being the artists in journalism, the future shaper today, whilst appealing to its tenants? For that a side bar is needed.

It’s 1905 one of the greatest scientists that ever lived has an idea to describe the properties and behaviour of light. For 200 years and if you remember your secondary or high school physics, light was a wave form. Einstein believed it could be a particle as well — tiny beaded particles, photons, moving together.

Surely it couldn’t be. That daring consideration would attempt to fuse two opposing variations. Yet we’re in the era 200 years advanced from how the world was, in Newton’s mechanical physics, to Einstein’s Quantum.

In experimental tests that would follow, this duality plagued scientists. And then in 1926 one brilliant Danish physicist Niels Bohr published his theory the Principle of complementarity. Light could be both. Thus resolving this dual conundrum. Wave type phenomenon data that appeared when its particle form was sought, and vice versa, could be chosen to suit intended experiments.

This was both the innate bombshell which would yield the enduring narrative for many a futurists in their professions. Bombshell because science’s carefully crafted persona of being objective had been de-robed. Author and scholar Leonard Shlain wrote:

Thus subjectivity the anathema of all science ( and the creative well spring of all art) had to be admitted into the carefully defended citadel of classical physics.

Yes, you might still prove empirical findings, as I once did as a trainee chemist, the inviolability of change for a chemical substrate like 2-Acetoxybenzoic acid (Aspirin) here and in Japan, but make no mistake a boundary had been crossed a hundred years ago. A connection in natural science between choice and interpretation, between what Bohr’s student John Wheeler explained was the conscious mind and reality out there.

Back to the main argument then, because if science could dally with this dissonance, and journalism purports to align itself with science’s empirical paradigms then somewhere, somehow a complementarity can be assumed, by artists (artists-journalists).

And that’s precisely what they’ve done. A fusion of subjectivity and attainment for objectivity. To want to be impartial, but knowing that’s impossible. Yet at the same time not wanting to be dispassionate which undergirds normative journalism. I want you to feel how I feel is the refrain from the artist-quantum journalists. This is 2021 after all.

Cold bare face journalism, wave form, engaged in an isomeric relationship with emotions in art/cinema (photons). I first came across this phenomena back in 1994 and it would be just over 20 years later in which I explored it as a PhD gathering evidence. And even then post-PhD there was, is, still work to be done.

As a science graduate, I had the opportunity of becoming a journalist reporting on major assignments around the world and would become one of the one-wo/man band journalists in 1994. And then I became an artist.

It wasn’t the discipline called videojournalism and its sibling mobile journalism that led to the artist and their new artistry, but the gateway did provide room for those wanting to seek another way.

TELEVISION NEWS’ BRILLIANCE

Some brief context. The introduction of the form of television news journalism you see today was a brilliant piece of engineering when it was created in the late 40s, and refined in the 1960s. It truncated one-hour documentary forms and news reels into new two-minute narratives.

But here’s where you need to take a leap of faith.

All other forms of making that involve peering at truth and reality have undergone alterations pressed by changes in societies e.g. literature, law, music, culture etc. What would make you think TV News journalism is an exception?

Television news’ dominance mirroring Hollywood films entry into Europe during the world wars was a in part down to its early uptake and being exported to the four corners of the globe.

But its integrity in its current state is faltering in ways it tries to interpret the complexities of the modern world. It has no solution for PR’s dirty tricks in dead cats, politician’s disinformation and boredom. Its structure and form bestowed by pioneers for the many reasons it was fit back in the 60s-90s is no longer applicable.

Remember you, your parents and friends grew up on the model of TV News. It showed you the world whilst teaching you to believe its way was the only way.

How do you spot the artist-quantum journalists? Look carefully. Over the years my investigations have become more pointed. There are clues. They have a habit of winning awards. People come to love what they do, but can’t seem to explain why, let alone replicate it, because in deconstructing what they see they look for answers in journalism’s existing field.

Next week Wednesday is the Royal Television Society’s Journalism Awards in which I served as one of its judges. If my hypothesis further tested is right, underneath this text, I’ll provide the evidence. In the meantime if you want to know more about the artist-journalist in what I refer to as the cinema journalist, this is your next read.

Forethought

Forethought — Looks to the future and reflects through past…

Forethought

Forethought — Looks to the future and reflects through past learning, storytelling, media and tech evangelised by Brit journalist, storyteller and senior lecturer David Dunkley Gyimah, embracing the wisdom of crowds and sharing

Dr. David Dunkley Gyimah

Written by

Top Writer & Creative Technologist, Int. Award Winner. Cinemajournalist. Cardiff Uni @jomec. PhD (Dublin). Visiting Prof UBC, Ex BBC/C4News. Apple profiled.

Forethought

Forethought — Looks to the future and reflects through past learning, storytelling, media and tech evangelised by Brit journalist, storyteller and senior lecturer David Dunkley Gyimah, embracing the wisdom of crowds and sharing

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store