Avoid 5 Common Mistakes A Product Owner Often Make in An Agile Team

The fastest pace to success is avoid known mistakes

The product owner determines whether a product succeeds or not. Usually, we would like a product owner to prioritize the product backlogs, engage in daily meetings, collaborate with the development team, align with multiple stakeholders, and make sure the maximum delivered values.

As per my experience, I never see such a perfect individual before because most product owners have their own pros and cons. They should try to amplify their advantages and eliminate their shortcomings with support of the team.

It is said that the fastest pace to success is avoid known mistakes. As a product owner, he could prevent some common mistakes from happening to achieve better communication quality with the team. I’d seen so many product owners cannot avoid repetitive problems to improve collaborative issues.

5 Common Mistakes

In my opinion, I think it matter to address 5 common mistakes a product owner often ignores. If you could avoid them, I believe you are very closed to the success.

• Less Collaboration

I am not sure if you had the similar experience. Once upon a time I met a a manger who often didn’t join meetings. Even, he did less collaborate with the team to clarify the requirements. That caused the team members to take all the tasks and face other business units directly. Such a behavior made the team frustrated as they were negotiating with other divisions since they had to take additional time to identify requirements.

As a result, the retention rate of the team became lower and often nobody was able to take over the left work. If a product owner does not fully collaborate with the team to identify critical issues, it is probably that some individuals would take the responsibility to keep them going.

• Passive Engagement

What if a product owner only cares about if the features are delivered as expected, and don’t engage in other meetings to help the agile team? There was once a product owner, Alex, with a deep understanding of the industry and a passion for creating exceptional user experiences. However, Alex had a reputation for being passive and disengaged during agile meetings, which hinders effective collaboration with the rest of the team.

No matter in daily stand-ups, sprint planning, and retrospectives, Alex played a vital role in fostering collaboration, transparency, and accountability within the team. However, his lack of active participation was causing significant challenges.

For example, during daily stand-ups, Alex would often remain silent, merely nodding in agreement or disagreement. This behavior made it difficult for the team to gain a comprehensive understanding of the project’s status and identify potential roadblocks.

In sprint planning sessions, his lack of engagement led to ambiguous user stories and vague acceptance criteria. This resulted in frequent misunderstandings, rework, and delays. The team members would have to make assumptions and rely on their own interpretations, which often led to misalignment with Alex’s expectations.

Moreover, during retrospectives, Alex’s passivity prevented valuable insights from being shared. The team’s suggestions for process enhancements or adjustments to their workflow were often left unaddressed, leading to a lack of progress and a growing sense of frustration.

Some readers might suffered from similar scenarios, so remember to report the condition to the management and take some time to think of the idea of supporting the role to continue or adjust his position.

• Unsustainable Pace

Developing a product is like running a marathon. The most common mistake is trying to force the team to deliver a big-bang release in a short time. This might cause short-term velocity spike but damages the team’s productivity in the long run. Instead, the product owner should respect the agile team’s autonomy to select the sufficient amount of work in planning meetings, and keep deliverables as steady as they could.

If he finds that the progress is too slow, please get people together to seek root causes and brainstorm creative solutions to eliminate the situations, such as flexing functionalities or changing implementation path.

• Ambiguous Review

Everyone wants to be acknowledged as they contribute to a product. In the review meetings, it would be a mistake that a product owner keeps exaggerating his achievements. For example, I once collaborated with a product owner, Jess, who had a strong desire to showcase his work and bask in the limelight. He consistently overshadowed the team’s efforts during sprint review meetings, disregarding their contributions and failing to respect their empowerment.

The team consisted of talented individuals who were passionate about their craft. However, his behavior during the sprint review meetings began to undermine their confidence and sense of ownership. During these important gatherings, he would often seize the spotlight. He would dominate the discussions, taking credit for the team’s accomplishments and downplaying their contributions. This left the team feeling undervalued and disempowered, as their hard work and ideas were constantly overshadowed.

This is a typical example that a product owner does not empower the team but himself. In this way, the team would gradually become less productive and unwilling to contribute to the product. To avoid the conditions, the product owner should bear in mind that always respect the team’s empowerment, and properly emphasize their contributions.

• Sprint Burn-down As Reports

I’d seen a product owner that used the sprint burn-down as a status report. And that caused the management began to acquire regular review into sprint burn-down reports. This implies some distrust between the product owner and the team. In, fact the primary purpose of sprint burn-down charts is to help the team identify issues during the sprints, inspect impediments, and adapt work to results.

If a product owner would like to communicate progress with stakeholders, I suggest them use a release plan or a release burn-down instead. Sometimes it is these details that determine the psychological safety among the team. Nobody likes being reviewed all the time, and prefer more autonomy on their work.

Coach’s Murmur

A product owner is the light house of a team. We cannot expect the role to be a perfect individual, but some common mistakes should be avoided up front. In conclusion, the role of a product owner is crucial in determining the success of a product. While it is rare to find a perfect product owner, it is essential for them to identify and address their shortcomings to foster effective collaboration and empower their teams.

By avoiding these common mistakes, product owners can enhance their collaboration with the team, respect their empowerment, maintain a sustainable pace, and provide a supportive and inclusive environment for success.

Let Me Help you

Now I provide free, 1–1 online consulting service. If you have any agile related problems or project management issues, please reserve a web call with me. I would answer your questions as possible as I could.

👉 Book now: https://calendly.com/uragilecoach/consulting
⚠️ Remember to send me a message through one of social platforms (LinkedIn, IG, Twitter, Reddit) within 1 hour, otherwise the reservation might be canceled.
🎁 Anyone who reserves for the web call would be rewarded with a secret gift that helps you grow on project management skills.

If you acknowledge the value I share with you, do as below:
1. 👏 the article
2. subscribe me for latest contents
3. follow me on other platforms for further information
- IG: @ur_agile_coach
- Podcast (Chinese): Agile Rocket
- Youtube: Your Agile Coach
- LinkedIn: Tsung-Hsiang Wu
- Twitter: @ur_agile_coach