Breaking the Mold: Challenging the Effectiveness of Scrum in Modern Software Development

In the software development world, the term “Agile” has become an umbrella that encompasses various methodologies, with Scrum being one of the most prominent. While Scrum has its merits, organizations overlook the fact that sprints often make things harder for teams and may not always deliver the intended value.

(This story contains ai-assisted content, and contains affiliate links)

Agile Simplified

At its core, Agile is a mindset that prioritizes flexibility and adaptability. It values customer collaboration, responding to change over following a plan, and delivering working software quickly. Agile is not tied to any specific methodology; instead, it’s a set of principles guiding how teams approach their work.

The Problem with Scrum

Scrum, on the other hand, is a specific management framework within the Agile spectrum. It introduces the concept of sprints — fixed time boxes where teams commit to delivering a defined set of work. While Scrum has worked for some, it’s essential to acknowledge that it may not be a silver bullet for all teams, and here’s why.

1. Priorities Change Fast
   No matter how short a sprint is, unpredictability can disrupt the best-laid plans. When faced with high priority bugs, or scope shift mid-sprint, teams face two unappealing choices: ignore the sprint plan entirely or ignore the new priorities, both of which are suboptimal.
2. Continuous Delivery and Agile
   The rise of cloud systems and the adoption of continuous delivery have made it easier to release software updates quickly. Hotfixes and feature flagging allow for on-the-spot releases, decoupling sprint scope from delivery. As a result, teams question the relevance of rigid sprint plans.
3. Complexity and Unpredictability
   Integrated systems introduce complexity and unpredictability. A simple library update could be blocked due to a dependency for weeks.

While proponents argue that Scrum promotes continuous improvement, and that these challenges can be addressed with each cycle, I contend that sprints themselves are often a hindrance to the continuous improvement process.

Kanban: A More Flexible Approach

Enter Kanban, an Agile methodology that offers greater flexibility. It retains planning and retrospectives but shifts the focus away from sprints. Instead, teams plan features or platform changes, adapting to evolving priorities without the constraints of fixed time boxes. The book Kanban: The Ultimate Guide to Kanban Methodology for Agile Software Development including Kaizen Mindset for your Business is the perfect place to start.

Conclusion

With over 14 years of experience in the software industry, encompassing roles in development, leadership, and management, I’ve had the opportunity to collaborate with teams spanning five different countries. The prevailing approach in most of these teams has been the utilization of Scrum or similar sprint-based methodologies. However, in my extensive experience, I have yet to witness the successful implementation of Scrum as a standard practice. While there are specific scenarios where Scrum may prove effective, I contend that these instances are more of an exception than the norm.

Subscribe to my Substack for more content like this.