Member-only story
Is Firefly About to Eclipse Midjourney in the Battle of the AI Image Giants?
Adobe leads on functionality, while Midjourney stays ahead on Aesthetics.
I was inspired to draw and write by Midjourney over a year ago. At first, there was very little competition. Now, the market is flooded with AI image generators. Some bring in extra functionality or controllability. Most go down the route of simplifying the user interface to the point where you are doing little more than selecting a bunch of presets.
Midjourney has stayed ahead because it hasn’t dumbed down, and it has kept its focus on improving its beautiful aesthetics.
[Please clap, highlight, follow, subscribe, comment or otherwise engage because that way I get thrown some peanuts]
To begin with, Midjourney was producing beautiful but imperfect images. These were fine for hobbyists posting on social media, but most artists who were integrating Midjourney into their work were using editing and upscaling tools to get the images up to publication standard.
Then Adobe began integrating AI generative tools into Photoshop. Now, I notice my workflow changes as Adobe and Midjourney battle it out. Each is bringing in regular updates. One day, I used Midjourney’s Pan and Zoom only to find Adobe’s generative expansion is more flexible and gives similar results.
If I had to choose one subscription over the other at the moment, I would choose Photoshop above Midjourney. This may all change as Midjourney bring in better style controls and functionality, and then it may swing back as Adobe increases its aesthetic controls.
Some Comparisons
Expand.
Generative expansion is a place where Adobe is leading the way at the moment. My first test was with a mainly hand-drawn character Maeve.
The superpower of Photoshop is that it doesn't alter your original image it just adds to it in the same style. It is also very quick. The expansion size is as variable as you like. I expanded the canvas with one click, and a single generation of…
