Gil Dibner
Oct 17, 2017 · 4 min read

Earlier this week, I released my third quarter report on European and Israeli VC trends. You might have noticed that I didn’t release one for the second quarter. The reason for that is simple: my first daughter was born April 18 and I got way behind on the data entry for the second quarter. The issue is, I enter all the data for these reports manually — reviewing every single deal across a pretty wide range of news sources. That is a ton of work, and I fell behind in the second quarter. So this quarter, I pretty much worked double-time on the data and got all caught up.

This got me to thinking about why I bother doing this in the first place. The bottom line is that I’m reading all these news stories and newsletters anyway — and trying to pay close attention to what is going on and which sorts of companies are getting financed — and why. It’s a way to force myself to really think about what is going on — and to try to notice both trends (and interesting outliers) that can drive my own investment decisions.

In the past, I’ve used a range of data sources to try to think about VC trends, and what I realized pretty quickly is that a lot of that data had to be cleaned if it was going to have value. And that cleansing process meant that I would have to maintain my own data anyway…the data available from paid sources just isn’t clean enough to use. A big part of that is that the paid data sources want their data to be “complete” — they don’t want any “venture investments” to be missing from their databases. So far, no one seems to have bothered to build a reliable algorithmic approach to this. In addition, I wanted the flexibility to categorize the investments into groups that made sense to me. Since I was gathering the data anyway, I realized it was a pretty short jump from there to releasing much of that data publicly — a nice way to give back to the community of which I am a part and hopefully to raise my own profile a bit in the process.

So what am I actually doing to clean the data? Basically, I’m going through every reported venture deal in Europe and Israel and eliminating the ones that don’t really belong:

  • First of all, you’d be amazed how many companies based in Vienna, VA are mis-categorized as European.
  • I try to eliminate companies that were founded way too long ago to count as “venture deals.” When a company that was founded in the 1990s raises money, it’s typically not a truly a venture round. It’s generally more of a buyout or a traditional private equity round, as opposed to a venture round.
  • I try to eliminate rounds that are actually private equity take-outs disguised as investments. This can be tricky, but sometimes it’s pretty obvious what is going on.
  • Many PIPEs and other investments into public companies get mistakenly listed as VC investments. I knock those out as well.
  • In their exuberance to show a healthy local VC eco-system, many news outlets report every corporate investment into another company as a venture round. Many of these have a lot of the characteristics of a true venture round (i.e. they are done by a corporate venture arm, or alongside traditional VCs) but many do not. For example, when a corporate makes a strategic investment in a highly complementary product or service in a slow-growing industry, that’s generally not really a venture round. It’s just an investment.
  • Because I’m focused on Western Europe and Israel, I limit my deal-tracking to the EU + Shengen countries. That means I don’t track Turkish deals, Russian deals, or Ukrainian deals.
  • I also don’t track most medical (therapeutic/diagnostic/pharmaceutical) unless they are primarily software-driven or healthcare IT.
  • Finally, for my own sanity, I don’t track deals under $500K.

Ultimately, the real value of this exercise for me is the value that I get from forcing myself to think about every single deal done in the ecosystem — if only for a few seconds. The by-product of that process, is the unique dataset that underlies the report I put together.

You can find the latest quarterly report here: European and Israeli Venture Data 3Q17.

Angular Ventures

Early stage. Enterprise Tech. Europe & Israel.

Gil Dibner

Written by

A global venture investor. Fascinated by the finance of innovation. Trying to help the few to do the impossible. Investing across Europe + Israel.

Angular Ventures

Early stage. Enterprise Tech. Europe & Israel.

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade