Tragedy befalls Joseph Mailliard

by Judy Coy

Joseph Mailliard in 1902 . Anne T. Kent California Room Collection.

In his 1924 Autobiography, Joseph Louis Mailliard recounts some of his family history and his early life and the wildlife on the Mailliard’s Rancho San Geronimo. He describes at length his work as an ornithologist, collecting birds and eggs, and the donation of 10,000 specimens that he and his brother made to the California Academy of Sciences in 1919. It is likely that his social standing, dislike of notoriety and the Victorian mores of the day prevented him from even hinting at the event which dramatically changed his life.

In December 1881, Joseph Mailliard married Emily Hort Tompkins, the eldest daughter of Minthorne and Harriet Tompkins, uniting two prominent families. The Tompkins had purchased 45 acres and built a home east of Red Hill in San Anselmo in 1870. The Marin Journal reported on the lavish wedding and observed that “Life opens very brightly for Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Mailliard.” The young Mailliards made their home at the San Geronimo ranch and had two children, Rena Hort Mailiiard (1884–1903) and Ernest Chase Mailliard (1887–1982). Their domestic life was thought to be “happy and harmonious.”

But on August 31, 1891, Emily Mailliard, 28 years old, disappeared in what became a major scandal of the day. Piecing together the story as it was presented by investigative journalists of the San Francisco Chronicle, the following unfolded.

It started with an advertisement placed in the Chronicle by a private investigator offering a $1,000 reward for information leading to the discovery of a woman who had disappeared. A description was provided but no name. A $100 reward was also offered for information leading to recovery of a trunk removed from the train depot at San Rafael.

A Chronicle reporter jumped right on this and discovered that the missing woman was Emily Tompkins Mailliard. At the end of August she had driven to a residence in San Rafael with a large trunk on the back of her carriage. While there, she opened the trunk and showed a quantity of newly purchased undergarments. She journeyed to San Francisco where she was seen by a dentist; this was the last time Emily was seen. Theories about her disappearance abounded. Some speculated that she was mentally deranged, others that she had been drugged, carried off and hidden, though a cousin pointed out that Emily was stout and couldn’t easily be hidden. Others thought that she had grown tired of life on the ranch and wandered off and would return. Friends said that she was a devoted wife and loving mother. Joseph Mailliard and the Tompkins were alarmed and grief stricken. The detective refused to discuss the case as it was a private matter.

The Mailliard’s San Geronimo Valley Ranch. Anne T. Kent California Room Collection.

Sister Julia, who did charity work in San Francisco with abandoned women and children, was consulted, and several private hospitals in San Francisco were visited. But Emily was not found.

Soon a different story started to emerge as there was concern over the whereabouts of a handsome hired man from the San Geronimo ranch named William Ingram. Joseph Mailliard and the Tompkins family were firm in their belief that Ingram had nothing to do with the disappearance.

Sketch of Emily Tompkins Mailliard, Sept. 29, 1891 © San Francisco Chronicle

Twenty-three days after her disappearance, the Chronicle reported that Emily Mailliard had been found, her mind deranged, and been returned to her father’s home. This story proved to be untrue as it was soon reported that she was found in a cabin in a logging camp in Humboldt County living with Ingram, the hired man. A mediator pleaded with her to return home, but she refused, professing her love for Ingram.

Joseph Mailliard immediately filed for divorce which was granted on November 12, 1891. He appeared “crushed and heartbroken on the stand.” Thus ended what the Marin County Tocsin called “the greatest sensation Marin county has ever known.” Mailliard took solace in his work at Rancho San Geronimo and raising his two young children. It was at this time that he “took up bird work in real earnest.”

Joseph and his brother John built adjoining homes in San Francisco in 1904, and when the remaining portions of the San Geronimo Rancho were sold in 1912, Joseph moved there fulltime and lived with his unmarried sister. With the donation of the Mailliard Collection to the Academy of Sciences, Joseph was appointed as an honorary curator and then curator. He took field trips, cared for the collection and wrote numerous scholarly papers on birds and mammals of the West Coast. Though he retired at age 70, he remained active as curator emeritus into his 80s. Joseph Mailliard died at age 87 on December 12, 1945.

And what of Emily Tompkins Mailliard? She and William Ingram married two days after the divorce was granted. Three months after the marriage William was so badly injured in a sawmill accident that his imminent death was feared, Emily was unwell and they were without money. In the 1900 census, the couple and a nine year old daughter are enumerated in Napa. No occupation is listed for William. By 1920, the Ingrams had divorced and Emily had married Joseph Meyer, a widower. She died May 25, 1954 at age 91 in San Francisco.

Emily never saw her children Rena and Ernest Mailliard again nor was she reconciled with or forgiven by her parents. Ethel H. Tompkins, Emily’s youngest sister and the founder of the Marin Humane Society, would have been about 15 at the time Emily left. Years later, Ethel declined biographical interviews, shunned publicity and felt it was “not proper for a lady’s name to appear in a newspaper.” Was this just an old-fashioned notion or the lasting impact of her sister’s action?

Originally published at https://annetkent.kontribune.com.

--

--

Anne T. Kent California Room
Anne T. Kent California Room Newsletter

The official Medium account of the archive of Marin County history & culture at the Marin County Free Library http://tinyurl.com/MarinCoSocialMedia