False: Chris Patten did not ask for Hong Kong’s “return” to British rule in the Hague

Sophie Mak
Aug 20 · 3 min read
Image for post
Image for post

[點擊查看本文中文版]

By Sophie Mak

A Facebook post on August 15 claimed that Chris Patten, the last governor of Hong Kong under British rule, visited the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Hague and applied for Hong Kong’s “return” to the United Kingdom.

The post was shared by many users including Elmer Yuen, a Hong Kong entrepreneur and pro-democracy activist with more than 64,000 Twitter followers.

His tweet gained more than 13,000 likes and 5,000 retweets. The topic also became a popular thread on the Hong Kong online forum LIHKG, amassing more than 2,600 likes.

Image for post
Image for post

The claim is false. Although he mentioned the ICJ in a public conference about Hong Kong recently, Chris Patten has never said he would go to the Hague or demand that the U.K. reclaim Hong Kong.

Patten attended a virtual meeting organized by the Council on Foreign Relations on Aug. 12, titled “Hong Kong Update — Autonomy and National Security.”

When asked by an audience member whether “the United Kingdom, as the cosignatory with China of the agreement of Hong Kong, has any cause of action against China in the International Court of Justice,” Patten said he “wasn’t sure what the British government is able to do in the ICJ about the breach of the Joint Declaration but it is certainly in a position to raise the issue at the UN.”

He went on to say he hopes that if the British government “got the chance of raising it with the ICJ, it will” but also said making complaints about China in the ICJ “wouldn’t make much difference to the way China is behaving.”

Hong Kong newspaper Apple Daily reported on the online meeting on Aug. 14 with the headline “Patten suggests filing a complaint against the Communist Party of China in the International Court of Justice” in Chinese.

Image for post
Image for post

The article mistakenly said Patten believes a complaint should be filed in the ICJ against Beijing for breaching the “One Country Two Systems” clause in the Sino-British Joint Declaration, but this appears to be a distortion of his comments.

Annie Lab has also examined other news sources but found no evidence of Patten making any similar claims.

The list of pending cases in the ICJ website does not show an application from Patten against the Chinese government either.

Luke de Pulford, a British activist working with Patten for the U.K.-based registered charity Hong Kong Watch, also tweeted that the claim is false.

Disclaimer: This is a student work. Although JMSC faculty members have done everything possible to verify its accuracy, we cannot guarantee there are no mistakes. If you notice an error or have any questions, please email us at contact@annieasia.org.

annie lab

Fact-checking project @ Journalism & Media Studies Centre…

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store