Socialism and Human Nature

Critics of socialism claim that because humans are by nature selfish and cruel, socialism won’t work. This doesn’t follow.

Ben Burgis
Arc Digital

--

Karl Marx exhibit in Trier, Germany. Statues created by Ottmar Hoerl. | Credit: Hannelore Foerster (Getty)

Anyone who sets out to defend socialism in the early decades of the 21st century needs to confront the wide variety of anti-socialist arguments developed during the 20th. Economic calculation problems represent a problem for the practicality of at least some socialist proposals. Libertarian arguments based on the idea of a natural right to property challenge their morality. But one of the most persistent claims of socialism’s critics, one that I want to tackle head-on, is the idea that socialism is not just impractical or even immoral but unnatural.

Economist and libertarian social critic Murray Rothbard, for example, entitled a book of his essays Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature. Psychology professor and science popularizer Steven Pinker breezily asserts in The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature that “socialism and communism…run against our selfish natures.”

Arc Digital columnist and historian Joshua Tait discusses, in a piece from last week, why scientific claims of this sort appeal so strongly to the right.

These are the discoveries — typically biological, psychological, or anthropological — that…

--

--

Ben Burgis
Arc Digital

Ben Burgis is a philosophy instructor at Georgia State University Perimeter College and the host of the Give Them An Argument podcast and YouTube channel.