Program Evaluation String x ASEAN Social Innovations Program (2022)

Reflecting on various product choices, hypotheses, and the program development process to date

Coordination call with our partners from MINT College and Colegio de Letran de San Juan in the Philippines
  • Students no longer worked with an enterprise concurrently while learning the module. In the previous cohort in 2021, Professor Brawn Cafe (a social enterprise food and beverage business housed in Raffles Institution) was looking for web ordering and digital marketing solutions. This tied in nicely with the learning outcomes of the program so students had to immediately apply what they learned in an authentic setting. Again the concern that this requirement was demanding so it was not pursued this year
  • Turned digital marketing workshop into a face-to-face session with a focus on student projects. Beyond the generic principles of 4Ps, digital marketing is hard to appreciate without applying it in context. This generally worked and a follow-up is pending.
  • Less ‘arrowing’ on Slack (the primary messaging platform for the program) for cultural exchange. Our first batch involved a very deliberate series of sharing.
How having some structure online that mirrors ‘cold calling’ softens the ground for online friendships
  1. [Validated] At least 3 students per cohort are keen on professional work experiences with startups and SMEs that they currently cannot find on their own. During 1:1 chats, some students explicitly shared that internships were the draw for them to join the program to begin with. This is encouraging.
  2. [Validated] Teachers and students from partner schools are willing and able to commit to 10–15mins culture sharing at the start of each session. Partner teachers and students from Letran were very supportive on this in both years. Students from MINT were also engaged in our first year of the program.
  3. [Validated] Teachers from partner schools can co-run the curriculum remotely. Our Filipino teacher counterparts were incredibly supportive and helpful in leading smaller group discussions with more favorable student-teacher ratios. This makes the program more scalable instead of having teaching load concentrated on a few trainers.
  4. [?] At least 1 student project per cohort persists beyond the program. Only time will tell for this one!

Lessons for the road ahead

  1. When in doubt between being ambitious or realistic for the curriculum, always go for the more ambitious option. Students will learn to live up to it rather than going for the lower common denominator. This shortchanged the learning experience of advanced students in the first batch and I suspect it did so again for the second. An advanced curriculum is differentiated instruction (students self-select into the difficulty levels they can manage)
  2. Authentic learning opportunities make a significant difference in motivating learners. Integrating them in program design was the premise of an Edutech initiative I built earlier and in retrospect, there is still some magic in that.
  3. Designing cultural exchange, especially online, requires a lot of deliberate effort and design. ‘Arrowing’ may not necessarily be a bad thing just to warm the ground.

--

--

Cross-border digital skills exposure program for pre-university students to address social issues in their region

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Kahhow

Educator interested in data science, dance and full stack development