Social Media Regulations in the US vs Australia

Trapica Content Team
Australian Marketing Club
7 min readApr 3, 2023

As social media platforms continue to grow and evolve, the need for effective regulations and policies to govern online behaviors becomes increasingly important. Social media regulations aim to strike a balance between protecting users’ rights and ensuring freedom of expression. However, the approach to regulating social media varies from country to country, reflecting each nation’s unique legal and cultural contexts.

In this article, we will compare and contrast social media regulations in the United States and Australia, examining the similarities and differences in their approaches to issues such as privacy, online harassment, and advertising. By understanding the regulatory landscape in these two countries, businesses and individuals can better navigate the complexities of social media and media ad planner and ensure compliance with local laws.

Privacy Regulations

Privacy is a key concern for social media users worldwide, and both the United States and Australia have implemented regulations to protect individuals’ personal information.

In the United States, there is no comprehensive federal privacy law governing the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information by private-sector organizations. However, several sector-specific privacy laws apply to certain types of data, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) for health information and the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) for children’s data.

Additionally, some states have enacted their own privacy laws, with the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) being the most comprehensive and influential legislation in this area. The CCPA grants California residents various rights regarding their personal information, including the right to know what data is being collected, the right to request deletion, and the right to opt-out of the sale of their data.

In Australia, the Privacy Act 1988 serves as the primary legislation governing the handling of personal information by private and public sector organizations. The Privacy Act establishes 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) that set the standards for collecting, using, disclosing, and securing personal information. In addition to the APPs, the Privacy Act also includes provisions related to credit reporting and the handling of sensitive information, such as health data.

While both countries have regulations in place to protect individuals’ privacy on social media, the scope and comprehensiveness of these regulations differ significantly, with Australia having a more unified and stringent approach to privacy protection.

Online Harassment and Cyberbullying

Online harassment and cyberbullying are serious issues affecting social media users, and both the United States and Australia have implemented measures to address these concerns.

In the United States, there is no federal law explicitly addressing online harassment or cyberbullying. However, existing criminal laws, such as those related to stalking, harassment, and threats, can be applied to online behavior. Additionally, several states have enacted legislation explicitly targeting cyberbullying, with varying degrees of penalties and enforcement mechanisms.

In Australia, the Enhancing Online Safety Act 2015 established the Office of the eSafety Commissioner to promote online safety and protect Australians from cyberbullying and other forms of online harassment. The eSafety Commissioner has the authority to investigate complaints about cyberbullying material targeted at Australian children and can issue notices to social media services, end-users, or hosting providers to remove the offending content. Additionally, Australian states and territories have laws addressing stalking, harassment, and threats that can also be applied to online behavior.

Both countries recognize the importance of addressing online harassment and cyberbullying, but their approaches differ in terms of the legal frameworks and enforcement mechanisms in place.

Advertising Regulations

Advertising on social media is an essential aspect of modern marketing, and both the United States and Australia have regulations in place to ensure that advertisements are transparent, truthful, and not misleading.

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforces advertising regulations, including those applicable to social media. The FTC’s guidelines require that advertising must be truthful and not misleading, substantiated by evidence, and fair to consumers. Additionally, the FTC has specific policies regarding endorsements and testimonials, which require influencers to disclose any material connection with the brand they are promoting. This disclosure must be clear, conspicuous, and not easily overlooked by consumers.

In Australia, advertising on social media is regulated by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) and the Australian Association of National Advertisers (AANA). The AANA’s Code of Ethics applies to all advertising, including social media, and requires that advertising must be legal, decent, honest, and truthful. Furthermore, the ACCC enforces the Australian Consumer Law, prohibiting misleading and deceptive advertising conduct. This includes influencer marketing, and influencers are required to disclose any commercial relationships with the brands they are promoting.

Both the United States and Australia have regulations in place to ensure that advertising on social media is transparent and not misleading. While the regulatory authorities differ, the underlying principles are similar, emphasizing the importance of consumer protection and transparency in advertising.

Content Moderation and Takedown Policies

Content moderation and takedown policies play a crucial role in ensuring that social media platforms are safe and inclusive spaces for users. Both the United States and Australia have legal frameworks in place that govern the removal of harmful or illegal content from social media platforms.

In the United States, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) provides immunity to internet service providers and online platforms, including social media companies, from liability for content posted by users. This immunity allows platforms to moderate content without fear of legal repercussions. However, this immunity does not extend to content that violates federal criminal law or intellectual property rights. Platforms are also required to remove content deemed as child sexual abuse material under federal law.

In Australia, the Online Safety Act 2021 establishes a regulatory framework for addressing harmful online content, including cyberbullying, non-consensual sharing of intimate images, and offensive, violent material. The eSafety Commissioner is responsible for overseeing the removal of such content from social media platforms and has the authority to issue takedown notices to platforms, end-users, or hosting providers.

While both countries have legal frameworks in place to address harmful online content, the United States takes a more hands-off approach, with platforms primarily responsible for content moderation. In contrast, Australia has a more proactive regulatory approach, with the eSafety Commissioner playing a significant role in overseeing content removal.

Copyright and Intellectual Property

Protecting intellectual property rights on social media is crucial for both content creators and platforms. The United States and Australia have implemented regulations to address copyright infringement on social media platforms.

In the United States, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) establishes a notice-and-takedown system for addressing copyright infringement online. Under the DMCA, copyright owners can issue takedown notices to online service providers, including social media platforms, requesting the removal of infringing content. If the platform complies with the takedown notice in a timely manner, it is granted safe harbor protection from liability for copyright infringement.

In Australia, the Copyright Act 1968 governs copyright protection and provides a similar notice-and-takedown system for addressing online copyright infringement. Under the Copyright Act, copyright owners can issue takedown notices to internet service providers, including social media platforms, requesting the removal of infringing content. Like the United States, compliance with the takedown notice grants the platform safe harbor protection from liability.

Both countries have implemented systems to protect intellectual property rights on social media, with similar notice-and-takedown mechanisms in place to address copyright infringement.

Conclusion

As social media continues to play a significant role in our lives, understanding the regulatory landscape is essential for businesses and individuals alike. While the United States and Australia share some similarities in their approach to social media regulations, there are notable differences in areas such as privacy, content moderation, and online harassment. These differences reflect the unique legal and cultural contexts of each country, as well as the varying degrees of government involvement in regulating online spaces.

For businesses operating in both countries, understanding these nuances is crucial for ensuring compliance with local laws and maintaining a solid presence on social media platforms. By keeping up to date with the ever-evolving regulatory landscape, marketers can better navigate the complexities of social media and foster positive online communities that benefit both businesses and consumers alike.

For individuals, awareness of social media regulations in their respective countries can help them better understand their rights and responsibilities as users. This knowledge can empower individuals to make informed decisions about their online behavior and contribute to a safer and more inclusive digital environment for everyone.

In conclusion, while the approaches to social media regulations in the United States and Australia may differ in certain aspects, both countries strive to strike a balance between protecting users’ rights and ensuring freedom of expression. As the online world continues to evolve, it is important for businesses and individuals to stay informed about the regulatory landscape and adapt their strategies accordingly. By doing so, they can make the most of the opportunities offered by social media while minimizing the risks associated with operating in a rapidly changing digital environment.

--

--