The Case Against That

In professional writing and editing, precision matters. One small word often overused is “that.” Style guides like the Associated Press Stylebook and the Chicago Manual of Style suggest omitting this word when it doesn’t enhance meaning or clarity.

For example, “She said she would come” is clearer and more direct than “She said that she would come.” Removing unnecessary words tightens the writing, making the message more powerful.

I encourage authors to rethink their sentences, “Eliminate ‘that,’ and strengthen your writing. If you can’t remove it, rewrite the sentence.” This advice reflects a broader professional consensus: writing should be efficient, using only words needed to convey the intended message.

By cutting unnecessary words, writers improve readability and flow. Overusing words like “that” clutters prose, distracting from the main points. Writing becomes sharper when writers focus on clarity and precision, ensuring each word adds value.

These principles are not just recommendations but standards in writing and publishing. Writing should be concise, respecting readers’ time and enhancing overall quality. The goal is to communicate clearly and engage the audience, avoiding filler words adding little to the narrative.

While “that” can sometimes clarify or prevent confusion, often, it’s not needed. Writers should examine each sentence and ask whether every word serves a purpose. If not, it’s time for a revision.

By carefully reviewing each sentence and removing unnecessary words, author create clearer, more compelling prose. This practice not only strengthens their writing but also makes it more enjoyable for readers.

We Don’t Want to Write the Laws; We Want to Publish the Books

Publication Consultants: The Synonym for Book Publishing — https://publicationconsultants.com