Reflections on Mini Prototype

Crudely render many ideas to find a solution worthy of a more precise investigation. — Frank Gehry

Prototype exploration with base.

Does it feel more or less promising? Why?

After the presentation to class, this take on the prototype feels more promising because:

• The shape and the design of the device is now mobile rather than a digital solution on a fridge or wall
• It is more attractive and appealing than a screen
• It invokes a sense of togetherness as it brings together the supporters and the person living with MS
• The AI based app is individual just like MS is different for everyone who is affected by it.

For scale.

What were unanticipated challenges or successes?

• An unanticipated response i got from the class was that they expected the orientation of the device on the base to be the representation of the emotion instead of the added response.
• The challenge that presented was how the shape of the device can change to incorporate more sides into it.
• A question was raised about standardizing the meaning of the colors for everyone which would mean taking away the option of setting the meaning of each color yourself. It would also mean simplifying the process of remembering what each color stands for by the patient and their families.

The cube has six sides with changeable colors through the app, programmed as LEDs.

What are key insights and implications of this exploration to your thesis exploration and concept?

• Shapes and colors are an important part of this device moving forward
• Mobility is key and should be considered when designing for the size of this thing, i.e can this be carried in a bag, etc?
• How does the device communicate with the app seamlessly so it updates on the go?
• Does the base charge the device for long enough to be used over a period of days?
• Should the face of the app light up, sound off to indicate the current emotion?
• Can there be a device that’s paired if the family/supporters happen to not live in the same house?
• Can there be haptics included to confirm responses when data is entered by the patient?

Some details of the prototype

Regardless if this is the idea you’ll be pursuing moving forward, reflect on the insights learned that may be applied to future prototypes (for example, lessons on reward, cue indicators, etc.).

• The community part of how this system brings together the family and the person living with MS is key here.
• The device is key to give off a signal, something which is key to opening up a path of communication from the patient to their families/supporters.
• The app which takes the conversation forward in actionable steps is the main piece of this system.