The Format of Reality
The format of reality
Aug 11
written by @MauriceLuymes
So what did we do in the weekend. Of course walk with Charlie the dog; and a few puzzles. This puzzle was: “what caused the Big Bang”; interesting question that seems. Underneath I’ll try to deal with it in a 1–2–3–4 quick answer, the quicker-than-you-can-boil-an-egg method.
1 What method to use to figure out this question?
1.1 What about using mathemetics
For such a question I use mathematics. There are a lot of world religions. And they all have their own language. Why not make my own:
A1 Jews have Hebrew
B1 Christianity started with Greek
B2 Muslims have Arabic, of which they say this is the best language.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — +
A2 Christianity 2.0 with language mathematics. That is also a language. I cannot figure out why they did not think about it.
1.2 Mathematics in physics
Mathematics is traditionally just about equations. So the things on the left side of the equation is the same as the stuff on the right side. And you can see this again in physics, which means, in our physical reality; mathematics is the language of reality:
1.3 Mathematics in religion
The most funny thing to me: you have exactly the same thing in religion. Look at this, the same A-B-B-A format
2. How to apply it?
2.1 Update Old Testament
Okay, but what to do with it? Why do we need to know that A-B-B-A is all over the place? Perhaps it can teach you something about balance. A-B-B-A is balanced. In an atheist vision they have creation and we humans are the highest, but we are not heavy enough to lift creation out of nothing; it will remain “on the ground”; point zero.
In religion it is balanced, jut put God there The idea is that God is so heavy that he could have outweighted the incomprehensibility of the Big Bang, pulled/triggered it out of nothingness.
But not necessarily a “physical heavyweight” but perhaps rather a “heavyweight thinker”; as the Big Bang started with light, and to balance that at the other side you might require something as brightness. In numbers:
A1 Big Bang incomprehensible event so IQ 0
B1 Humans, starts somewhere IQ 100
B2 Humans, not get too far beyond EQ 100
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — +
A2 God EQ 200
2.2 Update New Testament
There is also another thing. As a kid I liked fairy tales, and they usually start with a couple of challenges, but happy end.
A1 Cinderella challenge one hard
B1 Cinderella challenge two harder
B2 Cinderella challenge three hardest
— — — — — — — — +
A2 Solution!
In an atheist version, there is no start, but also no end: death. You have youth, adult life with challenges and then late adult life with disease and death. It is only going “downhill” and gets worse and worse.
That is weird, a mountain with only one side. In the religious version they also have afterlife. If I draw this again, it looks like this:
Appendix A. personal impressions
I made the ideas above by understanding that Genesis 1 to 3 runs parallel with John 1 to 3. This helped me to make schemes with two columns. Also the ideas of Simone Weil helped a lot, what she wrote about gravity. And a few visions I had as a kid.
Visions can be fake but I tried to “geolocate” them on the map and they fit. That is in the scheme below. Nobody can controle those visions, so I let them out. Also people cannot control stories about Jesus. But no problem, they refer to wider things and helped me fabricate the scheme:
Appendix B Universities
They don’t like these kind of things. Although I did some assessments of WISC/WAIS intelligence tests. I showed them:
IQ 100 = 50% speed of thought = 50% perception
IQ 200 = 100% speed of thought = 100% perception
In their tests they call this processing speed and openness; I scored 98–99,6% on processing speed (2023)
Appendix C Israel
I once made a theory about the name “Israel”, sort of reverse of Jacob: YX becomes XY. The structure YX-XY, same as ABBA. Today I also made a drawing of the flag of Israel, it is visible in the scheme
That can be related to the question: where are my people? People don’t like this kind of stuff too much. Well, then not. On Twitter I posted: I’d better put a lock on the door of the afterlife, like a code word, that no idiots enter it. Because that is weird with people. Many seem not capable of “independent thinking”.
Appendix D “saints”
In physics they say that there are a lot of “sea quarks” and some “validation quarks” that can validate a whole system. That is at microscale. Perhaps this is also at microscale: a lot of people that form a “sea of people”. They will cognitively remain under sea level. And some who validate life.
The sea folk might look strong or even regarded to be idols or even saints: people with strong opinions. But beware that “hollow vessels often make the most noise” and usually it sounds as “no”
