Understanding Information Gain in Decision Trees: A Complete Guide

I understand that learning data science can be really challenging…

…especially when you are just starting out.

But it doesn’t have to be this way.

That’s why I spent weeks creating a 46-week Data Science Roadmap with projects and study resources for getting your first data science job.

Here’s what it contains:

Complete roadmap with study resources

20+ practice problems for each week

A resources hub that contains:

• Free-to-read books
• YouTube channels for data scientists
• Free courses
• Top GitHub repositories
• Free APIs
• List of data science communities to join
• Project ideas
• And much more…

If that’s not enough, I’ve also added:

A Discord community to help our data scientist buddies get access to study resources, projects, and job referrals.

Like what you’re seeing?

Click here to access everything!

Now, let’s get back to the blog:

Let’s start with something simple: why do we even need decision trees in machine learning?

Well, imagine you’re in a forest of data — huge, overwhelming, and you have no idea which way to go. Decision trees help you navigate that forest.

They’re like your map, guiding you step by step, making decisions along the way. But here’s where things get tricky — choosing the wrong path in this forest can leave you stuck, or worse, lost.

Here’s the deal: In a decision tree, each “decision” (or split) is like taking a turn on your path, and that turn must be chosen wisely.

This is where Information Gain comes in, helping you find the most informative turn at every step. Without it, your decision tree might end up being no more useful than a guessing game.

You see, each time your model splits the data, it tries to reduce uncertainty. If the model splits without considering which feature provides the most information, the performance can drop.

Information gain solves this by helping the model choose the right attribute for each split, ensuring it stays on the optimal path.

In this blog, I’m going to take you through everything you need to know about Information Gain — from its mathematical foundation to how you can use it to build better decision trees.

Whether you’re a beginner or an experienced data scientist, I’ve got you covered with practical insights and real-world examples.

Overview of Decision Trees

Let’s kick things off by understanding the basics of decision trees.

What is a Decision Tree?

If you think about decision trees, it’s not much different from how we make decisions in life. Say you’re deciding what to eat for dinner. First, you might ask yourself: “Do I want something healthy or indulgent?”

Based on that answer, you narrow down your options — maybe it’s salad if you’re feeling health-conscious, or pizza if you’re going all in.

This is how decision trees work: they make a series of decisions (called splits) to arrive at a final conclusion, whether it’s predicting if a customer will churn, or classifying an email as spam or not.

In machine learning, decision trees are used as supervised learning algorithms, which means they learn from labeled data.

You train the model with a dataset that has features (like “age” or “income”) and a target variable (like “will purchase” or “won’t purchase”).

The tree keeps splitting the dataset at each step based on the feature that provides the most useful information until it arrives at the final leaf nodes — which are the predictions.

Let me break down a few terms for you:

• Nodes: These are decision points in the tree. Each node represents a feature on which the split is made.
• Branches: These are the possible outcomes from the split. Think of them like the directions you can take based on the decision made at the node.
• Leaves: These are the final outcomes or predictions made by the tree.

Importance of Splitting Criteria

Now, here’s a critical point: choosing the right splitting criterion is like choosing the right ingredient for your dish — it makes all the difference. You might be wondering, “What exactly is the splitting criterion?”

Well, it’s the rule the tree uses to decide how to divide the dataset at each node. If you choose poorly, your tree might end up overfitting (becoming too specific to the training data) or underfitting (not capturing the patterns in the data).

This might surprise you: Not all features in your dataset are equally valuable when it comes to splitting. Some features will give you a ton of information, while others might be as useful as a red herring.

Information Gain helps you identify which features are the most informative by measuring how much they reduce uncertainty (or entropy). But before we dive deeper into Information Gain, we need to cover something foundational — Entropy.

Introduction to Entropy

What is Entropy in Decision Trees?

So, what is Entropy? Imagine you have a deck of cards, and every card is completely mixed up — there’s no order at all. That’s what high entropy looks like — it’s a measure of disorder or uncertainty.

The more mixed up the data, the harder it is to make accurate predictions. Now, imagine that same deck is organized by suits and ranks. Suddenly, it’s much easier to predict which card might come next. This is low entropy — a more ordered, predictable situation.

In decision trees, entropy is a way to measure the uncertainty or impurity in a dataset. If a dataset has a mix of different classes (e.g., a 50–50 split of emails marked as spam and not spam), the entropy will be high. On the other hand, if the dataset is mostly one class (e.g., 90% spam), the entropy will be lower because there’s less uncertainty.

Here’s the formula for entropy that I like to use:

Where:

• pip_ipi​ is the proportion of instances of class iii in the dataset.
• ccc is the number of classes.

You might be wondering how entropy works in practice. Let’s say you’re working with a dataset where 60% of the emails are spam and 40% are not. You can calculate the entropy as follows:

After solving this, you get an entropy of about 0.97, which is pretty high — indicating there’s a lot of uncertainty in the data. If all emails were spam, the entropy would be 0, showing no uncertainty.

Why Entropy is Important

Entropy is vital because it tells you how messy your data is before you make a split. If you can find a way to reduce entropy after a split, your tree becomes more certain about its decisions. That’s where Information Gain comes into play — it measures how much entropy is reduced after each split, helping your model make the best decisions possible.

Here’s a quick takeaway: Think of entropy as the level of uncertainty in your dataset. The higher the entropy, the more random the data is. As you split the data, the goal is to reduce entropy, making the data more predictable and improving your model’s accuracy. Information Gain is the metric that guides these splits, ensuring your decision tree doesn’t get lost in the forest.

Information Gain — The Core Concept

Let’s dive into the heart of the decision tree algorithm — Information Gain.

What is Information Gain?

At its core, Information Gain (IG) is about reducing uncertainty. You might be wondering, “How does it work in a decision tree?” It’s simple — each time we split the data, we want to make things clearer, not more confusing. Information Gain helps measure exactly how much clarity (or certainty) a split provides.

Here’s the deal: Information Gain is the difference between the uncertainty (entropy) before and after a split. In other words, it’s like saying, “Did this split help us make better predictions?” The higher the Information Gain, the better the split.

Here’s the formula for Information Gain:

Let’s break this down into bite-sized pieces:

• IG(S, A): This is the Information Gain of splitting the dataset SSS based on attribute A. It’s what we’re trying to maximize at each node.
• Entropy(S): This is the entropy of the entire dataset SSS before the split. Remember, higher entropy means more uncertainty, and our goal is to reduce this uncertainty.
• ∣Sv∣∣S∣​: This term represents the proportion of data points that take on a specific value vvv for attribute A. In simpler terms, it’s the fraction of the dataset that goes down one path of the decision tree.
• Entropy(S_v): This is the entropy of the subset Sv, which includes only the data points that match value v of the attribute A. We calculate entropy for each subset after the split.

Essentially, Information Gain tells us how much uncertainty is removed after splitting the data based on attribute A.

You might be wondering why Information Gain is so critical. Well, every split in the tree is like taking a step forward. The better the step (i.e., the more information we gain), the closer we are to correctly classifying the data. If the Information Gain is high, it means the split is useful for making decisions.

Role of Information Gain in Decision Trees

Decision trees thrive on Information Gain. Here’s why: At each step, the tree evaluates all the possible attributes to split on, and it uses Information Gain to pick the one that reduces uncertainty the most. Think of it like this — each split is a puzzle piece, and you want the pieces that add the most clarity to the final picture.

For example, if you’re building a decision tree to predict whether someone will buy a product, splitting on age might reduce uncertainty more than splitting on hair color. Information Gain helps you identify the best feature to split on, ensuring that your model becomes more accurate with each step.

Step-by-Step Calculation of Information Gain

Now that you understand the theory behind Information Gain, let’s walk through a practical example. You might be thinking this is where the real magic happens — because it does! Let’s use a small dataset to see how this works in action.

Practical Example

Imagine you’re working with a simple dataset that describes whether someone plays tennis based on the weather. Here’s a mini version of the dataset:

The goal is to predict whether someone will play tennis based on these weather conditions.

Let’s calculate the Information Gain for the attribute “Outlook” (Sunny, Overcast, Rain).

Step 1: Calculate the Entropy of the Dataset

First, we calculate the entropy of the entire dataset before any split. We have 5 instances where the answer is “Yes” (play tennis) and 5 where it’s “No” (don’t play tennis). So the entropy for the full dataset is:

Why is this important? Well, an entropy of 1 tells us there’s a lot of uncertainty in the dataset — meaning it’s equally split between “Yes” and “No” outcomes.

Step 2: Calculate Entropy After the Split

Now, let’s split the data based on the attribute “Outlook”. There are three possible values: Sunny, Overcast, and Rain. We need to calculate the entropy for each subset:

• Sunny: 2 “No”, 1 “Yes”

Overcast: All “Yes” (no uncertainty here)

Rain: 2 “Yes”, 1 “No”

Step 3: Calculate Information Gain

Now that we have the entropies of each subset, we calculate the weighted average of the entropies after the split:

Step 4: Interpretation

The Information Gain for the attribute “Outlook” is 0.45. This means that splitting the data based on “Outlook” reduces the uncertainty in the dataset by 45%. It’s the most informative attribute in this case, and that’s why a decision tree would likely choose it as the first split.

Glad you’re enjoying the structure! Let’s break down Section 3: Information Gain — The Core Concept and Section 4: Step-by-Step Calculation of Information Gain in a conversational yet expert tone.

Alternatives to Information Gain

By now, you’ve seen how Information Gain is a superstar in decision trees. But — here’s the deal — it’s not without its limitations. Sometimes, you need alternatives to ensure your model makes the best possible decisions. That’s where Gain Ratio and other metrics come into play.

Gain Ratio: A Smarter Way to Split

You might be thinking, “If Information Gain is so great, why would we need something else?” Well, Information Gain has a little quirk — it can be biased toward attributes with many possible values. For example, if you have an attribute like “ID” where every value is unique, Information Gain would go crazy and split on that, even though it’s not a meaningful decision.

This might surprise you: One solution to this problem is Gain Ratio. It’s like Information Gain’s more sophisticated cousin. Gain Ratio adjusts for the number of possible values in an attribute, making it a fairer metric for splitting. It does this by normalizing the Information Gain against a factor called Split Information — which measures how evenly the data is split.

Here’s the formula for Gain Ratio:

Let’s break that down:

• IG(S, A) is the Information Gain for attribute AAA.
• Split Information(A) is a measure of how well the attribute splits the dataset.

Why does this matter? Gain Ratio levels the playing field for attributes. Instead of favoring splits that produce many tiny subsets (which Information Gain tends to do), Gain Ratio rewards splits that are both informative and balanced.

That’s why the C4.5 algorithm, a popular extension of the decision tree algorithm, uses Gain Ratio instead of plain old Information Gain. The C4.5 algorithm ensures that your tree doesn’t get fooled by attributes with lots of unique values, giving you a more reliable model.

Other Metrics: Chi-Square and Variance Reduction

While Gain Ratio is a big step up, it’s not the only alternative out there. Let me introduce you to a couple more metrics you might find useful in certain scenarios.

Chi-Square Test: Statistical Significance in Splits

Imagine you’re building a decision tree for categorical data, and you want to ensure that your splits are statistically significant. That’s where the Chi-Square test comes in. The Chi-Square test evaluates whether the difference between observed and expected outcomes in your split is due to chance or if it’s statistically significant.

Here’s how it works: You calculate the Chi-Square value for each potential split and choose the one with the highest significance. This test is particularly useful when you’re dealing with categorical data that doesn’t naturally lend itself to numeric measures like Information Gain.

Variance Reduction: Perfect for Regression Trees

If you’re dealing with regression trees, which predict continuous outcomes instead of categorical ones, you can’t rely on Information Gain or Gain Ratio. Instead, you’ll want to use Variance Reduction.

You might be wondering: “How does Variance Reduction work?” It’s pretty straightforward — when you split the data, you calculate the variance (or spread) of the target values in each subset. The goal is to reduce the variance as much as possible, which signals that the split has created more homogeneous groups. The more you reduce the variance, the better your split.

In essence, Variance Reduction plays the same role in regression trees that Information Gain does in classification trees — it guides the model toward making the best possible splits.

Conclusion

So, what’s the takeaway here? While Information Gain is great for many cases, it’s not always the best tool in your arsenal. Gain Ratio steps in to solve some of its shortcomings, especially when dealing with attributes that have lots of unique values. And when you need more specialized metrics — like the Chi-Square test for categorical data or Variance Reduction for regression trees — you’ve got plenty of options to ensure your decision tree stays sharp and accurate.

The bottom line: Choosing the right metric depends on your data and your goals. Whether you stick with Information Gain or opt for a more sophisticated alternative like Gain Ratio, the key is making sure each split brings you closer to building a robust and meaningful model.