Google Inc.: Censorship, Blacklisting and Political Manipulation

Google is using its technological tools to transform America and rig the election.

Google has made headlines recently, but not for the right reasons. This close attention was due to its artificial intelligence app called Gemini, which, in light of what we’ve seen so far, must be considered a fiasco. What has come out of the first experiments performed through Gemini is that it seems to view America and the West as bastions of black and native insurgents where diversity has erased all traces of the white man in history.

Asking Gemini to throw out an image of the U.S.’s Founding Fathers, for instance, gives you black and Native American men signing what appears to be a version of the American Constitution. The pope? A South Asian woman.

Does this represent Google’s vision of the future?

Google’s Woke Agenda

The answer might well be yes.

Behind Gemini is an army of engineers; all human beings. These carry the colors of their Big Brother, Google, which could easily be named the wokest company of all time. For in the name of neo-Marxist wokism, Google has had a very long road until now. And this road passes through its search engine.

As it has been proven thousands of times, Google Search shadow-bans conservatives, whose only crime is that they contradict opinions held by the company’s executives. These execs, as Peachy Keenan brilliantly pointed out in The Federalist, “are the products of years of corporate diversity training, ‘white fragility’ brainwashing, and accusations of ‘white privilege.’”

At least one name might explain the origin of Gemini’s fiasco: Jen Gennai, the founder of Google’s “AI Responsibility” initiative. Gennai said it out loud: the company’s “black, Hispanic and Latinx” employees are treated differently than white employees, adding that “antiracism” is a key component of its work. By “antiracism”, neo-Marxists, in reality, refer to anti-white policies.

And what’s more dramatic is that the same Jen Gennai, before the 2020 election, was caught on hidden camera saying that Google would do what it could to prevent Donald Trump from winning again. This leads us to the next topic.

Google’s Crusade to Rig the Elections

An email chain among senior Google executives revealed that the company tried to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election on behalf of one candidate, Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton.

We learn, through these emails, that Google execs, among other tactics, paid for free rides for Hispanic voters because they thought it would help Hillary Clinton win the battle for the presidential seat. In a meeting the morning after the election, Google co-founder Sergey Brin said: “I certainly find this election deeply offensive, and I know that many of you do too. (…) Many people apparently don’t share the values that we have.”

Kent Walker, Google’s Chief Legal Officer, promised that the company would take on the rise of “populism” and “nationalism”, meaning that the Republicans would pay a heavy price for their 2016 victory. The promise was fulfilled: in preparation for the 2020 election, Google manipulated its search results to advance “equity”, prioritizing “algorithmic fairness” over factual accuracy.

What does this mean?

We found out in 2019 when 950 pages of Google’s internal documents were leaked to the public, providing evidence of the company’s use of blacklists and machine learning algorithms to censor conservatives. In 2021, former Google software engineer Zachary Vorhies published a book in which he demonstrated how Google blacklisted and flagged hundreds of conservative websites and personalities to be censored or pushed down in search rankings.

Google even cracks down on the Republican Party’s finances. Between 2019 and 2022, Gmail cost Republican candidates over $2 billion in donations by flagging most fundraising emails as spam. A North Carolina State University study found that Gmail allowed the vast majority of emails from Democrats to land in the user’s inbox while more than two-thirds of messages from conservative candidates were marked as spam.

Google also set up what it calls a “fringe ranking/classifier”, which serves to define “channel quality”. In this classifier, the media that spread the Trump/Russia hoax for three years, ABC, CBS, and CNN, are described as “authoritative”, while those that showed skepticism on that issue, Fox and Breitbart, are ranked lower in the list.

So for the November election, even if Trump is ahead in the polls, Google could easily change the course of history by once more meddling with general information and disrupting the whole process. Republicans are aware of that, but will they go forward and do something about it?

Sources

Breitbart News, Fox News, Kanekoa the Great, Matt Walsh, Rita Panahi, The New York Post