Baby, feel the beat
A new task can measure how sensitive babies are to their own heartbeats.
From the beginning till the end of a person’s life, parts of the body continuously send signals to the brain. Most of this happens without the person even being aware of it, yet people can become aware of the signals under certain circumstances. For example, we can feel our racing heart rate or the “butterflies in our stomach” when we are anxious or excited. This ability to consciously sense signals from the body is called interoception, and some people are more aware of these signals than others. These differences between people can influence a wide range of psychological processes, including how strongly they feel emotions, how they make decisions, and their mental health.
Despite the crucial role that interoception plays in thought processes in adults, scientists know practically nothing about how it first develops. Progress in this field has been hindered largely because there was no way to measure sensitivity to interoceptive signals in infants.
Now, Lara Maister, Teresa Tang and Manos Tsakiris have developed a new task called iBEATS that can measure how sensitive an infant is to their own heartbeat. During the task, five-month-old infants were shown an animated character that either moved in synchrony with their own heartbeat or out of synchrony with their heartbeat. The infants spent longer looking at the character that was moving out of synchrony than the one moving in synchrony, suggesting that even at this early age, infants can sense their own interoceptive signals.
As with adults, some of the infants were more sensitive to their heartbeats than others, and Maister and colleagues could see these differences played out in the infant’s brain activity via electrodes placed on the infant’s head. Infants who had shown a strong preference in the iBEATS task also showed a larger brain signal known as the Heart-Evoked Potential (or HEP). Furthermore, this brain signal got larger when infants viewed a video clip of an angry or fearful face. This suggests that the infants’ brains were monitoring their hearts more closely when they were confronted with negative emotions.
This study provides a validated measure of interoception for very young participants. Using this task, researchers can now investigate which factors affect how awareness to interoceptive signals develops, including social interactions and the infant’s temperament. Maister and colleagues also plan to carry out longer-term experiments to learn exactly how interoception may influence the development of emotional abilities, and also what role it might play in disorders such as anxiety and depression. The findings of these future experiments may eventually guide interventions to treat these conditions.
To find out more
Read the eLife research paper on which this eLife digest is based: “Neurobehavioral evidence of interoceptive sensitivity in early infancy” (August 8, 2017).
