Award those who would truly benefit from receiving the recognition.

1/ A humble suggestion for awards/prizes given to faculty members.

2/ Might not be a bad idea to have very few and select awards be given to faculty members who have already obtained tenure.

3/ And reserve a majority of the rest of such named awards (that often come with small $$ attached) to non-tenured faculty, those still trying to make it.

4/ I have noticed, since my PhD days, that senior faculty keep adding prizes to their already long CVs. Reality is that…

5/ …they don’t really care about such awards and just add trophies to their shelves. It’s like a celebrity getting likes on their tweets. At some point you stop caring. And giving orgs don’t get to do the hard work required in selecting among those not already proven.

6/ In contrast, young and upcoming scientists would value such awards much more. It would mean so much more to their careers.

7/ And they are more likely to promote the awards more, thus furthering the goal and reach of the awarding organizations as well.

8/ In the meantime it’s fine to have the really big awards (the Nobel Prizes, Heinz awards and such) be open to all faculty.

9/ Possibly we will see more young scientists seeing support for their work and achievements.

10/ And if nothing else, at least we won’t fill back pages of science publications with award announcements that no one reads, including the awardees themselves.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.