You shall burn in hell!

Almost a decade ago it wasn’t easy for me to let go of Islam. Looming before me was the prospect of becoming literally the only unbeliever in my entire family. Our family has, what Muslims sometimes call, a “spiritual legacy” and (until this point) it had remained completely untouched among my siblings, first cousins, aunts, uncles etc. How can breaking that chain impact future generations? Would my children become atheists, Muslims, or something else? And what about my children’s children, and so on and so forth? There was simply no way to predict the ripple effect.
I knew very well what my reasons were for leaving the faith but, this got me to thinking, why had I become a Muslim in the first place? On one level, the answer is pretty straightforward. My parents led me to Allah, at the age of five, by the side of my bed. It’s a day that I still remember vividly. But, why had my parents become Muslims?
My dad’s “testimony” begins with an invitation to the Mosque(it was somewhere around age 6, I believe). The sermon that day was on hell and, long story short, the little boy, the one who was to one day become my dad, went forward and got “saved”. Afterward, in part because of his influence & persuasion (plus that of a local Imam), both of my father’s parents “accepted Allah” as well (and, ultimately, his siblings).
So, why do I bother to bring this up?
Well, what really struck me, as I thought more about this spiritual legacy, was how incredibly flimsy its foundations were (and are).
I mean, my father was just a kid who (quite literally) got the hell scared out of him. What child wouldn’t go forward, to get saved, after a sermon on the horrors that await them if they don’t”accept Allah as their lord and personal savior”? Had he really understand the implications of what he was agreeing to, especially at such a young age? Did he consider the fact that this information (presented to him by a trusted adult) might, in actual fact, be false?
Of course not. Like I said, he was just a kid.
Here’s the thing…despite the positive side effects, which I don’t question, do either of these stories represent good reasons to embrace Religion? Remember, it was these very experiences which led to the so-called spiritual legacy in my family.
As I pondered more on this dynamic, I began to also analyze the conversion experiences of other Muslims that I know pretty well. Were their initial reasons, for “accepting Allah”, any better than my mom’s or my dad’s? I won’t take the time to tell you each of their stories, since I have already illustrated the essential point, but my conclusion, after going through this analysis, was as follows…people, generally speaking, convert to religion due primarily to one of the following three factors (or some combination thereof)…
- a Religious home
- a personal crisis (emotional, financial, physical…)
- the influence of a friend and/or family member
I’m sure there are exceptions to this rule (aren’t there always?) but it’s crucial to keep in mind that exceptions don’t disprove the rule (that’s why we call them exceptions). Having said that, I’ve actually found it surprisingly difficult to think of viable exceptions to the above three scenarios (even when I’m trying to do so). Reflect on your own conversion experience for a moment…does one or more of these areas apply, as the primary factor leading to your conversion? How about the conversions of your family & friends? I’m willing to bet that nearly all of them will be a perfect fit with only, at best, the occasional exception.
Initially, I wondered if someone like William Lane Craig might serve to be an exception. After all, Craig is arguably Christianity’s #1 living defense lawyer. Surely he, if anyone, must have accepted Christianity for purely rational reasons. Not so. Actually, the way Craig tells it, he was on his way to becoming a “very alienated young man”, filled with “hate” and “inner anger”, the kind that “eats away at your insides”, “making every day miserable” etc. While in high school he ran into a girl, named Sandy, who had a happiness about her that he didn’t have at that time in his life. After finding out she was a born again Christian, Craig read the New Testament and became captivated by the “ring of truth” to Jesus’ teachings (yes, he actually used the phrase “ring of truth”). It sure sounds to me like the main influences, in his conversion, were personal crisis (my second point) and the influence of friends (my third point). I would encourage you to watch Craig’s testimony, in his own words, right here.
Here again, you might be tempted to ask, what’s my point?
Well, take note of what’s missing here. If my basic theory is correct, than consideration of the evidence is not one of the primary factors which leads to (the lion’s share of) Religious conversions. In other words, the majority of theists embrace Religion, initially, for reasons that have nothing whatsoever to do with its truth claims.
Later on, some theists do seek out rational reasons, to stay with religion, but in doing so most still don’t stop to truly consider the potential implications of the fact that they initially embraced it for really bad reasons. And, of course, the longer one holds to a belief (whatever it is) the more difficult it becomes to change. Our own brains works against us, in this respect, falling victim to various sorts of bad thinking; ie. the sunk cost fallacy (the more you invest in something the harder it becomes to abandon it).
Now, a Muslin might be tempted to say, as a defensive measure, that the same three factors apply to de-conversion; ie. those who, like me, move away from Religion to some manner of disbelief. They might be tempted to say this, but I genuinely think they would be mistaken. Actually, as best as I can tell, the majority of de-conversions are solo (in fact, often deeply private) experiences that are spurred on, at root, by intellectual doubts. Usually these people are moving away from how they were raised (in contrast to the first point), typically their lives are going reasonably well (in contrast to the second point), and they are more often than not turning against everything that their family & friends still believe (in contrast to the third point). Are there exceptions? Of course there are. But the more I read de-conversion stories, the more I realize that they differ markedly from conversion stories; and usually in ways that are quite similar to the ones I’ve just mentioned.
Of course, it would be fallacious to immediately disregard something, simply because of the manner in which it was first embraced (that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s false). Even still, I now see that there are “good” reasons, and there are “bad” reasons, to both accept and reject beliefs. Not all reasons were created equal, and recognizing this is one of the keys in learning how to think well.
How about you? Did you embrace your current belief system (be it Christianity, Islam, atheism, or something else) for “bad” reasons? If so, maybe it’s time to re-examine it.
Written by : Amine Asri — Co-founder of Candor a magazine dedicated to understanding the philosophy of our cosmos .

