6 Important Examples For Tech Companies: How Self-Selective Speech Can Breed A New Product
I have these series of posts where I stand for putting out self-selective language when communicating to your users.
To go deeper on that road, my point with todayâs article was to have a look at other industries (my favourite activity) and draw a parallel.
Ăvian Water.
In pop culture, Ăvian is deemed as a luxury/expensive product. I really want to dive deeper into the bottled water field with one article and remind everyone that as long as this industry exists (and is worth almost $200 Billion), branding is not dead. But thatâs for another day.
Now, Ăvian lately has been focused on a much younger audience for God only knows what reason. We can explore that reason but thereâs something else I want to point out about them. The self-selecting language. Hereâs something from their website

If you donât know these names, thatâs good. If you do, thatâs good as well. These collaborations served as limited edition products and itâs starting to become a tradition for Evian to do this. Theyâre collectibles and I wouldnât be surprised if 50 years down the line one of them will sell with added value.
Elie Saab, Kenzo, Alexander Wang, Christian Lacroix, Chiara Ferragni and, not included in the picture, Virgil Abloh from Off-White (the latter will be the 2019 edition that hasnât been released yet but just announced). These are all names that, around the year theyâve collaborated with Evian, served three functions:
1) Are associated with a higher-than-average price point (not necessarily luxury but at least high-end)
2) At that moment, they were âhypedâ i.e. they were riding a notoriety train
3) They were cool (they might still be) among young people
Those three are the main reasons why an almost 3-century-old company is collaborating with trendy names.

Why?
Self-selective language.
Chiara Ferragni doesnât mean anything to the 60-year-old executive, most probably â however, it means a lot to a 20-year-old micro-influencer.
And theyâre not the only ones who do that. H&M started in 2004 by collaboration with Karl Lagerfeld, one of the biggest names in fashion. What would they do? A special collection (same limited-edition aspect) with a big name, every year. Theyâre still doing that today.
Itâs not exactly the same strategy as Evian, which is why weâre mentioning both in an article â if they were both doing the same thing, weâd only look at one. H&Mâs approach is different in the sense that itâs about using their manufacturing power to make big names more accessible to people. However, both ends benefit from the collaboration.
And you can bet that the âself-selective languageâ idea is enforced with their yearly collaborations â on top of that, they breed a new product.
In tech
Enough fashion and luxury. Letâs talk tech.
Who does what? I mentioned Basecamp yesterday, hereâs what they put out in their home screen visual:

âHey! Nobody told me that!â
âRe:Re:Re:â
âWho has it?â
As it turns out, theyâre pointing directly at the problem theyâre solving. Below this screen, they underline the word âbusinessâ.
Objection:
Yeah-yeah, great news. They say who it is for. Thatâs something basic, everyone does that.
To which I would reply that my intent is to go a bit deeper. On their home page they also say âWe use Basecamp to make software (Basecamp!), discuss ideas, plan marketing campaigns, share pet pics â you get the idea. Itâs a one stop shop for all the things teams do together.â
See that? âDiscuss (âŚ), plan (âŚ), share pet pics â you get the ideaâ. Thatâs no language for Wall Street people or blue-chip companies. Thatâs for start-up people.
- This language
- The visual
- The friendly logo
- The cartoon-like website
- The grotesque font (in-your-face)
- The pastel-focused colour scheme
All these line up to speak directly to the tech people, no matter if theyâre founders or employee #50. Itâs a design wave and Basecampâs well-rooted and fluent in that language.
Other examples
Nootropics â the drugs that make you smarter.
A more and more populated audience as the Limitless movie gets more views. Some drugs are for people with ADD. Call them nootropics? Thatâs direct-speaking language for productivity/efficiency obsessed people. And selective, as it keeps away those who donât have the knowledge of this concept.
Vegan leather â an alter-ego of synthetic leather
Thereâs nothing to be eaten here, rather itâs just another name for the poor-worded âfake/faux leatherâ concept. It adheres to the vegan idea that animals should not be killed, so itâs self-explanatory.
Interested how successful a word change is? See for yourself.
Detox Teas
Teas that were cleansing your body existed way before 2014 but itâs only then that this wave started to rise tremendously.
Sure, itâs not just a matter of changing one word while the product is exactly the same, like in the case of vegan leather. However, we can all agree on the fact that the impact on people was increased once a specific niche of teas was created.
Tea that helps you with digestion? Meh. Tea that detoxifies your body, cleansing it of whatâs bad within you and keeping the good? Sign me up right now.
Whatâs the lesson here for SaaS companies?
Keep people out. Those who are âinâ will feel a stronger impact. And hey, you donât have to be a vegan to adhere to the vegan leather idea. The same thing applies to you, as a tech company.
For instance, you wouldnât have to be a productivity-obsessed person to be using a specific online list creator. However, if Iâm one of these âoutsidersâ and I hear about a SaaS that speaks directly to people who are obsessed about efficiency, Iâll say the magic words:
âI want that one and nothing else.â
I help tech CEOs reduce user churn, running Chagency_, an experiences design agency and writing daily. Say hi on Twitter or LinkedIn!
