Felix Lutsch
Jun 20 · 5 min read

A Design Concept for Liquid Staking Positions

Cosmos Bonded Proof-of-Stake is the first major implementation of a permission-less BFT protocol. The well thought out protocol features many nuances ensuring that the Cosmos Hub blockchain is performant and that the security of the system is economically guaranteed even in the presence of malicious actors. Yet, in our view, the design space of Bonded Proof-of-Stake has barely been scratched. It’s important to explore alternative designs that can improve the user experience and the economic potential of Proof-of-Stake.

During the Cosmos Hackathon (Hack4Atom) in Berlin, the Chorus One team in cooperation with Sikka implemented changes to the staking logic in the Cosmos SDK that would allow stakers to increase utilization of their staking positions and additionally allow for a more user-friendly delegation process. These changes will open up a wide range of use cases that, in the current implementation, can only be achieved through custodial counterparties (e.g. exchanges).

We achieve this by creating a representation of staking positions we call “Delegation Vouchers”; validator-specific fungible tokens that can be traded and used in decentralized finance (DeFi) products. The following post aims to lay out the details of our implementation, its advantages, and potential use cases. You can find our implemented hackathon code on Github and a recording from the hackathon presentation itself on YouTube.

Implementation Details

We implement a delegation pool for each validator on a Cosmos SDK chain. Instead of directly delegating to a validator, delegators transfer their Atoms to their desired validator’s pool. The pool automatically delegates to the respective validator and accrues rewards on behalf of the collective of delegators. Delegators receive delegation vouchers representing their share of the pool in return. These vouchers are fungible tokens that can be redeemed with the pool to receive their share of the pool’s updated holdings (a fraction of the delegated Atoms + accrued rewards — slashings). This is achieved by tracking a conversion ratio (Atoms/vouchers) between delegation vouchers and bonded Atoms for each validator pool. Accruing rewards increase the conversion ratio, while slashings decrease the conversion ratio.

The Delegation Flow using Delegation Vouchers.

All staking operations can be modeled using delegation vouchers. The user experience of staking on such a Cosmos SDK chain improves because rewards don’t need to be manually claimed by delegators anymore. Instead, rewards accrue for each validator pool on a per block basis. Unbonding is modeled as the burning of vouchers and receipt of underlying Atoms (calculated as vouchers times conversion ratio) after the unbonding period. Redelegation is modeled as the burning of vouchers combined with the issuance of new vouchers corresponding to the validator that received the redelegation. Newly issued vouchers resulting from a redelegation are non-transferable (frozen) for one unbonding period to make sure delegators remain accountable for infractions that were committed by the validator they redelegated away from.

Use Cases Enabled by Delegation Vouchers

Delegation vouchers could be traded at a discount bringing liquidity to staked Atoms, e.g. allowing delegators to sell vouchers on a decentralized exchange instead of unbonding. Additionally, delegation vouchers can be used in decentralized finance applications, e.g. as collateral in a DAI-style stablecoin system or in a Compound-like money market protocol. In addition, we believe delegation vouchers could allow for a market-based mechanism of ranking validator quality because delegation vouchers will need to be priced based upon their liquidity and the slashing risk associated with validators. Pools of delegation vouchers can be implemented allowing the creation of diversified tokenized delegation indices such as a Decentralization Index (pictured below). An example would be a Decentralization Index voucher tracking the delegation pattern of the Interchain Foundation. Holders of the Decentralization Index voucher will be able to foster geographic and voting power decentralization without requiring them to pay the mental cost of researching and evaluating validators. These are just a few of the possible use cases. Since one will be able to easily transfer delegation vouchers to other chains via IBC, they will enable permission-less and unbounded innovation.

Visualization of a Hypothetical Decentralization Index Voucher.

Advantages in Comparison to the Current Implementation

  • Unlocking the full economic potential of staking positions:
    Staked Atoms can be used in financial products, e.g. as collateral in other DeFi applications.
  • Providing a decentralized alternative to services offered by centralized custodial third parties:
    Centralized exchanges already announced that they will stake customer holdings and pay staking rewards. Thus Atom holders will benefit from liquidity as well as returns by relying on centralized third parties. In our view, this is a big threat to the Cosmos ecosystem and it’s critical to provide a level playing field for decentralized alternatives. Delegation vouchers will provide allow transferability without surrendering custody and will counteract the aggregation of Atoms with exchanges and custodians.
  • Better user experience for delegators:
    Delegation vouchers remove the need for withdrawing and re-staking rewards to achieve optimal returns. They allow users to get liquidity on their assets without having to sit out the unbonding period. Additionally, delegation vouchers could serve as the basis for staking indices that simplify (diversified) participation in staking.
  • Gas efficiency:
    Because delegation vouchers remove the need to manually claim and re-stake rewards for delegators, the new mechanism lowers the load on the network brought forth by these transactions.
  • Simplified accounting and potentially changing tax implications of staking:
    The structure of delegation vouchers might mean that they are taxed on a capital gains basis and not on an income basis (see graphic below; this is an unqualified observation, the taxation of delegation vouchers will depend on your jurisdiction).
Comparing the Current and Suggested Delegation Logic.

Associated Risks and Disadvantages

While delegation vouchers may increase the security of a PoS system because there is less need for unbonding or holding liquid staking tokens, there may also be emergent types of attacks, e.g. a validator shorting his own delegation voucher and double-signing. Implications of this model need to be researched in detail. The model also raises concerns about systemic risk that could potentially arise from multiple usage of collateral. It remains too early to definitely comment on the second and third order effects of such a design.

Next Steps

We will do a more detailed write-up and explore extending functionalities to enable products like staking indices. In the medium term, we would like to explore a proposal to change the staking model of the Cosmos Hub to increase the utilization of staked assets. If you have feedback on our design, please let us know! Reach out to us on Telegram with your comments or if you are interested in collaborating.


Originally published at https://blog.chorus.one on June 20, 2019.

Chorus One

Chorus One is building and operating validators on Proof-of-Stake networks.

Felix Lutsch

Written by

Research Analyst @ChorusOne. Editor @StakingEconomy. @FelixLts.

Chorus One

Chorus One is building and operating validators on Proof-of-Stake networks.

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade