Why Couldn’t Sproul and Bahnsen Be Friends?

Cody Libolt
Feb 25, 2019 · 1 min read

In regard to Apologetics, why couldn’t RC Sproul and Greg Bahnsen agree?

Sproul spoke highly of Bahnsen. They did a friendly debate once. Sproul thought Bahnsen was the ablest of Van Til’s interpreters.

Sproul’s main critique of Bahnsen is that he commits the fallacy of petitio principii (begging the question) by attempting to assert that we should start with knowledge of God.

We are not God. If we were, then we could start with knowledge of God. But, since we are created beings, we start with knowledge of ourselves.

While it is certainly true that God is first in the order of being, God is not first in our order of knowing. Bahnsen confuses the order of being with the order of knowing.

See Sproul explain all these points here.

Other Resources:

How I Got from Alpha to Omega — A Rundown on this Month’s Presuppositionalism Discussions

Revelation and Responsibility

Reason and Faith in the Gospels: A Scriptural Guide

Subscribe to receive our free, weekly newsletter:
For the New Christian Intellectual

For the New Christian Intellectual

Ideas Matter - Help restore the mind in Christian life

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store