Why It’s Not “Better” To Give

Cody Libolt
Oct 24, 2014 · 2 min read

I often hear the misquote: “It is better to give than to receive.”

Image for post

Paul relays this maxim from Jesus in Acts 20:35.

The error? Jesus did not say “It is better…” Rather, he said, “It is more blessed…”

Notice the shift in meaning this change allows. “More blessed” pointed to self-interest of the giver, but “better” allows us to gloss over that detail. It suggests that a choice could somehow be “better in general,” rather than better for a specific person.

But values are always values for particular people, for particular purposes they have chosen.

The switch would have been justified, had it appeared in any of the major translations. But one after another agree: the ESV, KJV, NIV, NASB, NLT, the Holman, and all the others say “more blessed.”

What does the erroneous shift make possible? It removes the personal motivation. It makes it seem that the needs of others should be our final priority.

But what does Jesus’ maxim mean?

Does Jesus teach us to give as an end in itself, or for the sake of the blessing we will receive?

Read for yourself, and decide.


For the New Christian Intellectual

Ideas Matter - Help restore the mind in Christian life

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch

Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore

Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store