Crypto Weekender 5/24

Wilson Withiam
Circle Research
Published in
4 min readMay 28, 2019

Curated reads, listens, views by Ria Bhutoria and Wilson Withiam.

Weekly Spotlight 🔦

The Unbundling of Ethereum by Kyle Samani

Kyle Samani’s latest piece discusses the impact of Ethereum losing developer and project mindshare to alternative dapp platforms on the wealth stored in its native cryptocurrency ETH. Ethereum has earned this monetary premium by bundling a wide variety of apps onto a single platform, giving ETH value beyond its utility for gas payments. But due to inherent throughput, latency, and cost constraints, developers are selecting competing chains or migrating existing Ethereum projects to other platforms at an increasing pace. Samani states common blockchain applications — gambling, in-game assets, security tokens — may not need Ethereum’s level of trust-minimization or, in the case of security tokens, a blockchain solution at all. Moreover, alternative chains optimized for specific use-cases are being deployed and gaining interest — Binance chain for token issuance, JP Morgan’s chain for enterprise solutions, and Tari’s digital asset platform for managing event tickets — accelerating the divergence from Ethereum.

Despite these developments, Samani argues open finance applications can only function on Ethereum right now, as other smart contract platforms do not store enough wealth and liquidity to compete. These use cases are not only “value accretive” to ETH but operate more efficiently than legacy financial substitutes in spite of Ethereum’s shortcomings. As a result, next generation chains and the migration of other verticals are unlikely to impact ETH’s monetary premium in the short run. Ethreum’s dominance is further buoyed by being oldest and most stress-tested operational network, especially compared to chains like Algorand and Kadena that have yet to launch on mainnet.

One caveat Samani mentions is the uncertainty surrounding the transition from Ethereum 1.0 to Ethereum 2.0 and the complexity of deploying applications in a sharded blockchain environment. Ethereum 2.0 promises improved throughput and reduced transaction fees, but there are potential nuances currently unknown to Ethereum developers that may impact time to deployment and discount ETH’s monetary premium.

Reads 📚

The Past & Future of Blockchain: Where we’re going and why by Spencer Bogart

ELI5 Explanation of the Ethereum 2.0 Testnet by Mohamed Fouda

The Case for Better Data in Crypto (Slides from CBUS 2019 Conference) by Nic Carter

Bitcoin: an Accounting Revolution by Murad Mahmudov and @ImacallyouJawdy

Lightning Network Consensus is a Marketplace and That’s Okay! By John Carvalho

Decentralized Lending: An Overview by Antonio Juliano

MetaMask Metrics: a first look by Bobby Dresser

Tweets

Matt Walsh thread on the corporate mindset around blockchain projects

The TIE thread on recent Bitcoin tweet volume and sentiment analysis

Ari Paul thread on crypto security

Arianna Simpson thread on traditional vs. decentralized prediction markets

Listens 🎧

What Bitcoin Did: A Bitcoin Reality Check in Venezuela with Jill Carlson, Alejandro Machado & Jamaal Montasser

Click Here to Apply with Tony Sheng: Kyle Samani teaches me about starting and operating a crypto hedge fund

Unchained: How to Trade on Crypto Exchanges Without Fear of Hacks

Staked Podcast: Investing in Governance with Jake Brukhman

The Blockcrunch: Can Crypto Change How We Run Organizations? — Luis Cuende (Aragon)

Zero Knowledge: Diving into Cosmos with Sunny

Off the Chain: The Bitcoin Sign Guy: The Legend of the Sign

Blockchain Insider: Do the crime, do the time

Base Layer: Alexander Skidanov (NEAR)

Citizen Bitcoin: Gigi: 21 Lessons from Down the Bitcoin Rabbit Hole

Views 🎥

Bitcoin’s Wild Ride special on 60 minutes

Is the Freedom to Transact a Universal Human Right? panel and the rest of the Consensus 2019 talks

Reports, market insights, and other information (“Information”) provided by Circle Internet Financial Limited (“Circle”) or its affiliates have been prepared solely for informative purposes and should not be the basis for making investment decisions or be construed as a recommendation to engage in investment transactions or be taken to suggest an investment strategy in respect of any financial instruments or the issuers thereof. Information has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research under the Market Abuse Regulation (EU) No 596/2014. Information provided is not related to the provision of advisory services regarding investment, tax, legal, financial, accounting, consulting or any other related services and is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any asset. Information is based on sources considered to be reliable, but not guaranteed, to be accurate or complete. Any opinions or estimates expressed herein reflect a judgment made as of the date of publication, and are subject to change without notice. Trading and investing in digital assets involves significant risks including price volatility and illiquidity and may not be suitable for all investors. Circle and its affiliates trade and hold positions in digital assets and may now or in the future trade or hold a position in an asset that is the subject of Information provided. As a result, Circle or its affiliates may be subject to certain conflicts of interest in connection with the provision of Information. Circle will not be liable whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from the use of this Information.

--

--

Wilson Withiam
Circle Research

Research Intern at Circle Research | Chapter Head @DappDevsCT