Comparing Blazor Maui and Electron: Pros and Cons

Hi, today I will try to answer the question of whether we should use Blazor Maui or electron while developing.

As someone who has experienced both, I can say that I think Blazor is ahead of electron in many ways.
Let’s examine the differences together.

When it comes to building cross-platform desktop applications, developers have a choice between two popular frameworks like: Blazor Maui and Electron. Both offer their own unique set of benefits and drawbacks, so it’s important to understand the differences between them before making a decision.

One of the key differences between Blazor Maui and Electron is the programming languages they use. Blazor Maui allows developers to build desktop applications using C# and Razor syntax, while Electron uses JavaScript and HTML. This means that developers who are already familiar with C# and Razor will likely find Blazor Maui easier to work with, while those who are more comfortable with JavaScript may prefer Electron.

Another key difference is the performance of the two frameworks. Blazor Maui applications are compiled to native code, which means they tend to run faster and have better performance than Electron applications. On the other hand, Electron applications are built on top of Chromium.

In terms of deployment, Blazor Maui allows developers to build applications that can be installed and run on Windows, macOS, and Linux, while Electron applications can be deployed on all major operating systems. However, Electron applications tend to be larger and require more resources, which can make them more difficult to distribute and install.

Ultimately, the decision between Blazor Maui and Electron will depend on the specific needs of your project and your own preferences as a developer. Both frameworks have their own strengths and weaknesses, so it’s important to evaluate them carefully before making a decision.