Mastering Generic Self-Type Traits and Type Bounds in Scala: A Guide to Best Practices and Advanced Techniques
Self-types are a way to declare that a trait must be mixed into another trait, even though it doesn’t directly extend it.
The self-type definition can be utilized to access the superclass. Further information on this topic can be found here. However, it is assumed that the reader of this blog is already familiar with the concept of self-type traits and is specifically interested in the implementation of a generic self-type trait.
Case Study
The presence of unnecessary whitespace within a class can negatively impact code readability and maintainability. Smart constructors or factories can be utilized to address this issue. Specialized cleaning functions for handling the cleaning process are the alternative. This allows for the preservation of both versions for different use cases.
The implementation of a trait that provides a method for cleaning its subclasses can be useful in addressing the issue of unnecessary whitespace within a class. This trait can be defined as follows:
Now, The class Mess
can then extend this trait and implement the clean
method.
Now, we have a clean object.
Call only One Method
In order to achieve a completely clean object, it may be beneficial to implement an additional method in the Cleaner
trait, which utilizes the clean
method in a repeated or recursive manner.
The implementation of the cleanAll
method should be provided within the Mess
class, which extends the Cleaner
trait.
Generic Self-Type Traits at Its Best
In order to reduce code redundancy, it may be appropriate to include the implementation of the cleanAll
method within the Cleaner
trait. This ensures that any class that extends the Cleaner
trait will have access to the cleanAll
method and its implementation, without the need for duplicate code within each individual class.
But this implementation will result in a compile-time error.
The assumption that the type parameter T
of the Cleaner
trait is a superclass of the implementing class, in this case Mess
, may not always be valid. The implementation of the Mess
class may specify a different type as T
and still conform to the requirements of the Cleaner
trait, leading to a valid implementation.
It is not possible to invoke the clean
method on the unwantedMess
object as it is not an instance of the Cleaner
trait. How can we add the assumption to the implementation of Cleaner
?
Upper-type bound acts as a superhero here and will save us! To further enhance encapsulation, the clean
method can be designated as protected and the cleanAll
method can be marked as final.
Incompatibility of the UnwantedMess
class with the constraints set by the Cleaner
trait will result in a compilation error.
Conversely, the implementation of the Mess class is expected to conform to the constraints set by the Cleaner trait and thus will not result in compilation errors.
Use Case
I faced this issue when I was trying to implement a PATCH
method in a REST server. Can you think of any other use case for this method?
A practical implementation of the generic self-type trait is available in the ‘23_update’ project within my GitHub repository. Feel free to check it and open issues and PRs.
I hope you enjoyed this tutorial. Thank you.