DeFi Explained: Fundamentals, Categories, and Risks

Ervin Zubic
Coinmonks
3 min readApr 27, 2024

--

Understand the building blocks, categories, and vulnerabilities of DeFi. This article summarizes expert research for investors, enthusiasts, and regulators.

Intricate black and white pencil sketch depicting an interconnected network of labeled gears and cogs representing aspects of decentralized finance (DeFi) such as ‘DeFi’, ‘Liquidity Pools’, ‘Synthetic Tokens’, and ‘Risk Analysis.’
DeFi Dynamics.

This article is also published on Mirror.xyz.

In their scholarly article “SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) — Fundamentals, Taxonomy and Risks,” authors Krzysztof Gogol, Christian Killer, Malte Schlosser, Thomas Bocek, Burkhard Stiller, and Claudio Tessone offer a compelling glimpse into the intricate world of Decentralized Finance. The team from the University of Zurich delves into DeFi, contrasting it sharply with traditional financial systems (TradFi) and dissecting the risks embedded within DeFi protocols.

Summary of the Research Article

Research Question and Methodology

This paper ambitiously seeks to unravel the complexities of DeFi by systematically categorizing its protocols and assessing associated risks. By focusing on protocols that account for over 90% of total value locked (TVL) in DeFi, the authors ensure their findings are both relevant and comprehensive.

What is Total Value Locked (TVL)? Total Value Locked (TVL) quantifies the total value of digital assets staked or locked within a specific decentralized finance (DeFi) platform or application (dApp).

Table displaying DeFi Protocol Categories, including Liquid Staking Tokens, Interest-rate Protocols, Decentralized Exchanges, Bridges and Wrapped Tokens, Crypto-backed Stablecoins, Yield Farming Aggregators, and Other, alongside their respective counts of protocols and total value locked (TVL) in billions.
Figure 1. The image shows a table that categorizes different types of DeFi protocols, lists the number of protocols in each category, and details their corresponding total value locked, denoted in billions. Source: SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) — Fundamentals, Taxonomy and Risk, pg. 2.

Key Findings

The researchers categorize DeFi protocols into three broad types: liquidity pools, pegged and synthetic tokens, and aggregators. Each category is meticulously analyzed for inherent risks and operational characteristics. The study highlights the pivotal role of blockchain technologies like Ethereum, which facilitate the execution of complex smart contracts essential for DeFi operations.

Flowchart depicting DeFi Value Proposition with four main branches: Trading, Lending, Asset Management, and Interoperability, each with examples of services like DEX (Uniswap, Curve), DEX Aggregators (1inch, 0x), Interest-Rate Protocols (Aave, Compound), Crypto-Backed Stablecoins (MakerDAO, Liquity), Yield Farming (Convex, Yearn), and Liquid Staking (Lido, RocketPool).
Figure 2. The image presents a structured flowchart mapping out the key areas of DeFi’s value proposition, including various services and examples within the sectors of trading, lending, asset management, and interoperability. Source: SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) — Fundamentals, Taxonomy and Risk, pg. 1.

Critical Analysis

Strengths

The paper’s structured approach to classifying DeFi protocols is a powerful aspect. It not only clarifies the operational landscape of DeFi but also introduces a risk framework tailored for this modern financial sector.

Limitations

Despite its strengths, the paper could enhance its utility with more detailed case studies on DeFi protocol failures. Such additions would provide deeper insight into practical vulnerabilities. An expanded discussion on the economic impacts of these technologies could provide a fuller picture of their potential systemic influence.

The Most Surprising Aspect

Surprisingly, the paper reveals that liquidity pools, fundamental to DeFi’s operation, carry significant risks. These include impermanent loss and exposure to market volatility, which pose challenges to the perceived stability of DeFi platforms.

A table from the “DeFi Security Risk Overview” section displaying various DeFi risks like Rug Pull, Slippage, and MEV Attack, assessed across different DeFi services such as DEXs, interest-rate protocols, and stablecoins, with indicators for vulnerability status for service customers, liquidity providers, arbitrageurs, and governance users.
Figure 3. The image shows a detailed matrix categorizing the vulnerability of different stakeholders in the DeFi ecosystem to a variety of risks associated with various DeFi protocols and services. Source: SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) — Fundamentals, Taxonomy and Risk, pg. 12.

Implications and Potential

The research has significant implications, especially for regulators and DeFi participants. It paves the way for better regulatory frameworks by clearly understanding DeFi protocols and their risks. Additionally, insights into programmable blockchains could drive innovation, leading to safer and more efficient DeFi applications.

Conclusion

“DeFi — Fundamentals, Taxonomy and Risks” is an essential guide for anyone exploring the DeFi ecosystem. It provides a thorough analysis of DeFi’s operational and risk landscapes, advocating for more sophisticated regulatory and risk management strategies. The paper not only highlights the revolutionary potential of DeFi but also cautions against its vulnerabilities, encouraging a balanced and informed engagement with these technologies.

Explore Next

Discover how blockchain is transforming industries on the Blockchain Insights Hub. Follow me on Twitter for real-time updates on the intersection of blockchain and cybersecurity. Subscribe now to get my exclusive report on the top blockchain security threats of 2024. Dive deeper into my blockchain insights on Mirror.xyz.

--

--

Ervin Zubic
Coinmonks

Exploring cyber threat intelligence with a focus on FinCrime & blockchain forensics. Check out my work on GitHub and Mirror.xyz. Connect on Twitter for updates.