The Yield Farming Craze Showcasing the DeFi Money Lego Nature
— August 11th, 2020 by TokenInsight Research
Email: research@tokeninsight.com
Overview
With the craze around incentivised liquidity mining (aka Yield farming), we analyzed the Balancer Protocol liquidity pools on July 30 and discovered that the YFI yield farming and other similar initiatives leveraging Balancer Protocol as the underlying liquidity pool truly represents DeFi money lego features in the industry.
Balancer Protocol played an important role in the YFI liquidity farming due to its automated market maker structure
Balancer Protocol belongs to the decentralized exchanges (DEXs) in the DeFi ecosystem and leverages an Automated Market Maker (AMM) structure called Constant Mean Market Maker as its underlying AMM system. There are different variations of AMMs in the DeFi ecosystem. The following table is a typical representation of the different subtypes of Constant Function Market Makers (CFMMs) AMM. The biggest difference between Balancer Protocol and Uniswap is that on Uniswap every liquidity pool has been restricted to only 2 assets with equal weighting, while Balancer Protocol allows for more than 2 assets in a single liquidity pool with unequal weighting. At present, a liquidity pool in Balancer Protocol can consist of up to 8 different assets.
The popularity of YFI lies in the fact of high yield and the ability for users to choose different yield farming strategies by interacting with other DeFi projects such as Curve Finance and Balancer.
The YFI farming is essentially the “Derivatives Squared” which users can deposit stablecoins on Curve Finance to get yCRV token, deposit yCRV and YFI token on Balancer protocol to get BPT, deposit BPT on yearn finance to farm YFI token, and lastly deposit YFI token and meeting minimum requirements to get yCRV, which this structure has formed a closed loop in the Yearn finance system.
The above yield farming strategy relies on DEXs and yearn.fnance protocol to achieve. Yearn.fnance’s main role is the yield aggregator, and DEX plays an important role in providing entering and exiting liquidity to these participants. Due to the different AMM structure and protocol rules, the creator of Yearn Finance decided to leverage the Balancer Protocol to create a 98–2 liquidity pool in order to minimise the liquidity providers’ impermanent loss.
Shared vs Private liquidity pools
We analyzed the overall balancer liquidity pool on July 30, 2020. The number of liquidity pools has exceeded 1,000, and the combined liquidity has exceeded $300 million. Balancer liquidity pool consists of private and shared liquidity pools. The shared liquidity pool allows any user to provide liquidity and trade corresponding tokens. The shared pool far exceeds the private type in terms of No. of liquidity pools and aggregate liquidity.
1. Private liquidity pools
There were only 23 private liquidity pools on July 30, and each liquidity pool consists of different types and various tokens. 5 private pools out of the 23 consists of only one type of token and one liquidity pool has up to 7 types of token assets. The majority of the liquidity pools only consist of two types of tokens, indicating that although the design of Balancer allows users to create a liquidity pool consists of more than 2 tokens, it is clear that the majority of the users still prefer liquidity pool with two types of tokens due to potential greater risk exposures on multiple tokens resulting in a greater impermanent loss.
The 24-hour total trading volume from the private liquidity pool is very small and only contributed by mainly 3 liquidity pools. The distribution of private liquidity pools is extremely unbalanced. Due to the whitelisting proposal from the Balancer Protocol community, many private liquidity pools were not been whitelisted, among 23 private liquidity pools, 17 liquidity pools have less than $500 liquidity, 2 have between $450,000 and $650,000 liquidity, and 4 have more than $1 million.
2. Shared liquidity pools
Balancer has a large number of shared liquidity pools, with a total of 999. Every liquidity pool currently consists of 2 to 8 tokens, and nearly 70% of the liquidity pools consist of two tokens. Unlike private liquidity pools, there is no shared liquidity pool consisting of only one token.
The number of liquidity pools consists of 2 types of tokens accounted for only 66%, contributing 88% of the 24h trading volume and 90% of the liquidity pool capacity. We have also discovered that 50% of the shared liquidity pools have zero liquidity and 67% of them have zero trading volume.
The YFI yield farming craze encouraged a substantial increase of the trading volume, No. of traders and liquidity providers in the Balancer ecosystem
On July 30 there were 24 individual liquidity pools which contributed YFI tokens for liquidity, and all of them in the shared liquidity pools. The total liquidity of these 24 liquidity pools reached nearly $12 million, and the 24h trading volume exceeded $1.2 million. The comparison of liquidity pool data with and without YFI token has shown below.
The Balancer Protocol saw an immediate jump in trading volume, No. of unique traders, and liquidity providers post-launch (July 17) of the YFI liquidity mining initiative. With the continuous YFI yield farming craze in late July, the number of liquidity pools containing YFI token accounts for 4% of the total shared pools, and the trading volume has reached 7% of the total Balancer trading volume on July 30. The average daily trading volume (~$54000) of the liquidity pools with YFI token on that day was 1.6 times the average daily trading volume of the liquidity pools without YFI token (~$33000). The YFI yield farming craze has brought a positive impact on the Balancer Protocol ecosystem.
Final Thoughts
We believe yearn.fnance is one of the most successful projects in the DeFi space as for now. The DeFi experiment has demonstrated the composability of the DeFi money lego. Although it is undeniable that the benign interaction between the three platforms of Balancer, Curve and yearn.fnance has promoted the development of DeFi, its ultra-high returns have attracted a large influx of speculators and further pushed up speculative activities in the DeFi space. At the same time, the success of the Yearn Finance Protocol has set an example on how to bootstrap liquidity and different stakeholders’ interests by correctly providing the incentive.
About TokenInsight
Founded in 2017, TokenInsight is a Leading Data & Tech Driven Blockchain Financial Institution. TokenInsight pioneered a complete blockchain industry classification system, covering more than 1,600 projects, releasing more than 300 rating reports, and conducting in-depth studies into 10 major industries.
TokenInsight’s data, ratings, and research reports have access to more than 70 data platforms worldwide, including Messari, Delta, Binance Info, AICoin, Huobi Info, etc., with a monthly PV of over 30 million. TokenInsight has officially joined the Data Accountability and Transparency Alliance (DATA), initiated by cryptocurrency ranking site CoinMarketCap.
If you like our reviews, please follow us on:
💡Official website: https://www.tokeninsight.com
📌Official LinkedIn page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tokeninsight/
🔎Telegram: https://t.me/TokenInsightOfficial
🗺Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/tokenInsight
📕Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/TokenInsight/
Also, Read
- The Best Crypto Trading Bot
- Crypto Copy Trading Platforms
- The Best Crypto Tax Software
- Best Crypto Trading Platforms
- Best Crypto Lending Platforms
- Best Blockchain Analysis Tools
- Crypto arbitrage guide: How to make money as a beginner
- Best Crypto Charting Tool
- Ledger vs Trezor
- What are the best books to learn about Bitcoin?
- 3Commas Review
- AAX Exchange Review | Referral Code, Trading Fee, Pros and Cons
- Deribit Review | Options, Fees, APIs and Testnet
- FTX Crypto Exchange Review
- NGRAVE ZERO review
- Bybit Exchange Review
- 3Commas vs Cryptohopper
- The Best Bitcoin Hardware wallet
- Best monero wallet
- ledger nano s vs x
- Bitsgap vs 3Commas vs Quadency
- Ledger Nano S vs Trezor one vs Trezor T vs Ledger Nano X
- BlockFi vs Celsius vs Hodlnaut
- Bitsgap review — A Crypto Trading Bot That Makes Easy Money
- Quadency Review- A Crypto Trading Bot Made For Professionals
- PrimeXBT Review | Leverage Trading, Fee and Covesting
- Ellipal Titan Review
- SecuX Stone Review
- BlockFi Review | Earn up to 8.6% interests on your Crypto