RE: Cost of Bitcoin Mining Misconceptions

Hello Medium, I’m Christopher Bendiksen — I head up research at CoinShares; lately we’ve heard some rather unsubstantiated claims about the energy consumption / climate impact of the bitcoin network repeated through various media channels.

The volume of these claims has gotten too loud to ignore — so, we’ve written a comprehensively researched paper on the current state of Bitcoin mining network.

We intend for this to be the first iteration in a series of many such papers designed to keep the debate honest and — to the highest degree possible — based on facts.

In case you are pressed for time, here are 6 key takeaways:

Yes, I know, volts isn’t germane..but cool pic, right? Pic by Thomas Kelley

1. Bitcoin’s Energy Usage Is A Major Component Of Its Network Security Model

Unlike previous centralised network infrastructures where a third party is in total control, in a distributed system, part of the key to keeping the transaction record honest is determining who gets to write to the database.

In the Bitcoin protocol, any entity requesting write privileges (adding pages) to the distributed database (ledger) has to prove an expenditure of energy (work).

Why? They need to prove that it cost them something to contribute to the network; a contribution for which they are subsequently rewarded with bitcoins.

No risk (expenditure), no reward (bitcoin).

The reward being paid in bitcoin ensures the incentives are aligned between maintaining truthfulness (security) of the network and mining (writing to) the network; because acting in bad faith for the network results in diminishing the value of the bitcoin reward (financial loss for the actor).

The end result is that any reasonable attempt to fraudulently amend or append the database requires a CAPEX investment that is larger ($) than the size of the existing (honest) mining network. The larger the on-going energy expenditure and prior CAPEX expenditure, the larger the required investment to attack.


2. Prior Reports On Bitcoin’s Energy Footprint Were Greatly Exaggerated

Our calculations show prior reports overestimated by a factor of nearly two*.

Where our research produced an estimate of 35 TWh in mid-May, prior estimates had that at nearly double — 65 TWh*. We would also like to note that this is simply a criticism of previous methodologies. If the previous estimate had indeed been correct, it would suggest an even higher level of security than what is currently achieved.

dam | Photo by T L on Unsplash

3. Hydro Power Actually Appears To Be The Primary Electricity Source Of The Bitcoin Mining Network

Counter to prior reports of the bitcoin network’s carbon footprint (32M Tonnes) — our research: 1) finds no proof of this claim, and 2) in fact identified the primary source of power for the mining network to be hydroelectricity*.

The reason is simple, coal is too expensive. Bitcoin mining is extremely competitive and the cheapest available electricity is most often found at stranded or seasonally overproducing renewable generation sites.


4. ‘Migratory Miners’ Seasonally Move To Wherever Conditions Are Most Suitable (Profitable)

Price pressures on electricity for mining are so strong that some miners migrate with the seasons to capture the cheapest renewables, in the most advantageous climates, often when seasonally variable production outstrips the steadier demand.

A side effect of this is that there is evidence of miners tapping into more remote/stranded/newly built sources of renewables due to the high mobility of bitcoin miners and immobility of generation infrastructure.

In this sense Bitcoin miners use bitcoin as a “synthetic battery” of sorts, converting otherwise unproductive or wasted electricity generation into spendable monetary assets.
…rumored to be miners flying North for the season by Ethan Weil

5. Annually, Network Hashrate Grows By ~300%, While Chip Efficiency Grows By ~80% And Chip Cost Per Hash Falls by ~50%

Over the last 4.5 years, the network hashrate has grown by approximately 300% annually*.

Over the same time span, chip efficiency, measured in GH/J has increased by an average annual rate of nearly 80% while the chip cost per hash ($/TH/s) has fallen by an annual rate of nearly 50%*.

This means that every year, a miner’s dollar buys them nearly twice as much hashpower as the year before (CAPEX), and that new hashpower draws only a little more than half the electricity (OPEX).

6. We’re Observing Increasing Geographical Distribution Among Miners

In the wake of the unfriendly policies towards Bitcoin miners adopted by the Chinese government we areobserving an increase in miners setting up shop in the Nordic countries, Canada and north-western United States.

Common to all these locations are cool climates, availability of cheap renewable energy, high-speed internet and business-friendly governments.

That’s a good starting point to get you going.

For more in-depth reading on sources, methodologies and more see the white-paper here:

Disclaimer

Please note that this Blog Post and associated WhitePaper is provided on the basis that the recipient accepts the following conditions relating to the provision of the same (including on behalf of their respective organisation).

This Blog Post and associated WhitePaper does not contain or purport to be, financial promotion(s) of any kind. This Blog Post and associated WhitePaper does not contain reference to any of the investment products or services offered by members of the CoinShares Group.

Digital assets and related technologies can be extremely complicated. The digital sector has spawned concepts and nomenclature much of which is novel and can be difficult for even technically savvy individuals to thoroughly comprehend. The sector also evolves rapidly.

With increasing media attention on digital assets and related technologies, many of the concepts associated therewith (and the terms used to encapsulate them) are more likely to be encountered outside of the digital space. Although a term may become relatively well-known and in a relatively short timeframe, there is a danger that misunderstandings and misconceptions can take root relating to precisely what the concept behind the given term is.

The purpose of this Blog Post and associated WhitePaper is to provide objective, educational and interesting commentary and analysis in connection with the Bitcoin Mining Network. This Blog Post and associated WhitePaper is not directed at any particular person or group of persons. Although produced with reasonable care and skill, no representation should be taken as having been given that this Blog Post or associated WhitePaper is an exhaustive analysis of all of the considerations which its subject matter may give rise to. This White Paper fairly represents the opinions and sentiments of its author at the date of publishing but it should be noted that such opinions and sentiments may be revised from time to time, for example in light of experience and further developments, and the White Paper may not necessarily be updated to reflect the same.

Nothing within this Blog Post and associated WhitePaper constitutes investment, legal, tax or other advice. This Blog Post and associated WhitePaper should not be used as the basis for any investment decision(s) which a reader thereof may be considering. Any potential investor in digital assets, even if experienced and affluent, is strongly recommended to seek independent financial advice upon the merits of the same in the context of their own unique circumstances.

This Blog Post and associated WhitePaper is subject to copyright with all rights reserved. Neither this Blog Post and associated WhitePaper nor any parts thereof may be reproduced, modified or otherwise used (for any purpose) without the prior written consent of the copyright holder.