一问无锡梁亮案：谁偷走了被扣押的巨额资产？

来自微信公众号：特约评论员 刑辩理想主义 2023–11–13 21:14 发表于日本

A question about the Wuxi Liang Liang case: Who stole the huge assets that were confiscated?

2023年7月、9月间，梁亮等人涉嫌传销一案在无锡市锡山区法院公开开庭审理，梁亮等六名被告人被控组织、领导传销活动罪。简单地说，梁亮等人运用区块链技术开发了Coinxp公链，并在其上搭建了Hubdex数字资产交易所，代码保存在Github，服务器架设于香港阿里云和美国亚马逊，用户资产托管在cobo，用户的社区活动组织在四川、重庆、杭州等地。而在Hubdex运营正常、没有一名用户投诉有经济损失的情况下，无锡公安在2021年初启动刑事侦查程序，把这个团队的6个人从天南海北抓到了无锡。这是一起争议巨大的案件，整个司法活动从实体到程序反映出的问题触目惊心，而其中最为突出的，便是无锡公安涉嫌对扣押的巨额虚拟货币（20.00055611个比特币、100.09个以太坊、403607.8788个USDC，合人民币近千万元）监守自盗的问题。

In July and September 2023, the case involving Liang Liang and others, suspected of running a pyramid scheme, was publicly tried in the Xishan District Court of Wuxi. Liang Liang and six other defendants were charged with organizing and leading pyramid selling activities. In simple terms, Liang Liang and his team developed the Coinxp public blockchain and built the Hubdex digital asset exchange on it. The code was stored on Github, with servers set up in Hong Kong’s Alibaba Cloud and Amazon in the USA. User assets were custodied at Cobo, and their community activities were organized in places like Sichuan, Chongqing, and Hangzhou. Despite Hubdex operating normally without any user complaints of financial loss, Wuxi police initiated a criminal investigation in early 2021, arresting the team’s six members from various locations to bring them to Wuxi. This highly controversial case revealed shocking issues in both the substance and procedure of the judicial process. The most prominent issue was the alleged embezzlement by Wuxi police of the huge amount of virtual currency confiscated (20.00055611 Bitcoin, 100.09 Ethereum, 403607.8788 USDC, worth nearly ten million yuan).

众所周知，刑事案件涉案财产的扣押只是一种暂时性状态，公安机关必须对其妥善保管，如果被告人最后无罪，扣押的财产应当悉数发还，即便被告人被定罪，这些财产也要上缴国库、依法处置，断没有被办案机关私分的道理，而在本案中，价值上千万人民币的虚拟货币在被无锡公安控制后不翼而飞，而无锡公安有着重大嫌疑。

As is commonly known, in criminal cases, the confiscation of assets involved in a crime is only a temporary measure. Law enforcement agencies must properly safeguard these assets. If the accused are ultimately found innocent, the confiscated assets should be fully returned. Even if the accused are convicted, these assets must be turned over to the state treasury and disposed of according to law. There is no justification for the investigating authorities to privately distribute these assets. In this case, the virtual currencies worth tens of millions of yuan disappeared after being controlled by the Wuxi police, raising significant suspicions about their involvement.

一、漏洞百出的扣押程序 Flaws in the Confiscation Procedure

首先需要说明，虚拟货币的持有者通常会使用电子钱包等方式管理自己的虚拟货币，一个电子钱包可以管理好几个地址，地址就相当于存储虚拟货币的账户，助记词就相当于这些账户的密码，掌握了助记词，就可以控制电子钱包里的虚拟货币。而虚拟货币因为去中心化的性质，并没有像银行一类的交易结算中心，也不存在将某个账户“冻结”的操作，所以一般来说，公安会在掌握电子钱包和助记词后第一时间统计各地址上现存的虚拟货币，而后将涉案的虚拟货币转入一个公安自己控制的地址，用这种方式完成所谓的“扣押”。

To begin with, it’s important to note that holders of virtual currencies typically manage their assets using digital wallets. A single digital wallet can control multiple addresses, where an address functions like an account for storing virtual currency. The mnemonic phrase is akin to the password for these accounts; possessing the mnemonic phrase allows one to control the virtual currency within the digital wallet. Due to the decentralized nature of virtual currencies, there is no central transaction settlement center like a bank, nor is there an operation to “freeze” an account in the conventional sense.

本案就是这样，2021年4月14日，无锡公安跨省抓捕了梁亮等人。执法录像显示，侦查人员在早上7点52分进入梁亮家中，扣押了梁亮的手机、记录助记词的笔记本、助记词板等物品，并在9点57分将梁亮带走，梁亮的《传唤证》和第一次《讯问笔录》也证实了这一点。也就是说在这个时候，无锡公安便已经控制了这些虚拟货币。

In this case, on April 14, 2021, Wuxi police conducted a cross-provincial arrest of Liang Liang and others. The law enforcement video shows that investigators entered Liang Liang’s home at 7:52 AM, confiscating his mobile phone, a notebook recording mnemonic phrases, mnemonic phrase boards, and other items. By 9:57 AM, Liang Liang was taken away by the police. This is confirmed by Liang Liang’s “Summon Certificate” and the first “Interrogation Record.” This means that at this time, the Wuxi police had already taken control of these virtual currencies.

然而奇怪的是，对于控制的各种虚拟货币，无锡公安并未按照规定进行全面统计，根据梁亮回忆，在他的强烈要求下，公安在15日上午开具了一份记录虚拟币种类、汇总数量的扣押清单（包括后来“丢失”的20.00055611个BTC、100.09个ETH、403607.8788个USDC全部记录在案）。然而这份扣押清单既没有给梁亮，也没有随案移送，在之后的司法程序中消失了。

Interestingly, the Wuxi police did not conduct a comprehensive inventory of the various virtual currencies they controlled, as required by regulations. According to Liang Liang’s recollections, at his insistence, the police issued a confiscation list on the morning of April 15th, which recorded the types and total amounts of virtual currencies confiscated. This list included the later “lost” 20.00055611 BTC, 100.09 ETH, and 403607.8788 USDC. However, this confiscation list was neither given to Liang Liang nor transferred with the case file, and it subsequently disappeared in the later judicial process.

而后，无锡公安拿出了一份《电子数据现场提取笔录》，这份笔录没有见证人签名、没有同步录像，记载的制作时间是“2021年4月14日08时00分至2021年4月14日12时30分”，制作地点是梁亮家中，但就像前面说的，实际上无锡公安在梁亮家中只进行了物品翻找搜查，并在9点57分全部离开，其间从未发生电子数据检查的工作，可见这份笔录是伪造的。

Subsequently, the Wuxi police produced an “Electronic Data On-site Extraction Record.” This record, however, lacked signatures from witnesses and did not have accompanying video recordings. The time noted for the creation of this record was “from 08:00 AM to 12:30 PM on April 14, 2021,” and the location was stated as Liang Liang’s home. However, as mentioned earlier, the Wuxi police were only engaged in searching and seizing items at Liang Liang’s home and had left by 9:57 AM. There was no electronic data inspection work conducted during this time. This discrepancy suggests that the record was fabricated.

更奇怪的是，直到案件审理结束，无锡市锡山区检察院、锡山区法院和辩护律师也从来没见过这些手机、笔记本、助记词板，尤其是登录了电子钱包的手机，无锡公安何时进行了电子数据检查、是否进行了其他操作根本无从得知。

Even more peculiar is that throughout the trial, neither the Xishan District Procuratorate of Wuxi City, the Xishan District Court, nor the defense lawyers ever saw the seized mobile phones, notebooks, or mnemonic phrase boards, especially the mobile phone that had access to the digital wallets. There is no information on when the Wuxi police conducted electronic data inspections on these devices or if they performed any other operations on them.

二、被隐匿的虚拟地址 Hidden Virtual Addresses

虽然程序漏洞百出，这份伪造的《电子数据现场提取笔录》却成为了指向无锡公安监守自盗的关键线索。

Despite the numerous procedural flaws, this fabricated “Electronic Data On-site Extraction Record” ironically became a key clue pointing towards the potential misconduct of the Wuxi police, specifically the suspicion of them embezzling the assets they were supposed to safeguard.

在这份笔录中，无锡公安通过掌握的助记词在专用手机上登录了梁亮的电子钱包（imToken），并对手机界面进行了拍照，照片清楚地显示电子钱包中共有9个ETH（以太坊）虚拟地址，而后在网上查询到了每个地址的虚拟货币余额，并将地址、余额等信息记录到“梁亮虚拟钱币包币种余额信息.xlsx”文件中。

In this record, the Wuxi police logged into Liang Liang’s digital wallet (imToken) using the mnemonic phrase they had seized and used a dedicated phone for this purpose. They took photographs of the phone screen, which clearly showed that there were nine ETH (Ethereum) virtual addresses in the digital wallet. Subsequently, they searched online to determine the cryptocurrency balance of each address and recorded the addresses, balances, and other information in a file named “Liang Liang Virtual Coin Wallet Currency Balance Information.xlsx.”

但当辩护律师们打开案卷里“梁亮虚拟钱币包币种余额信息.xlsx”这个文件时，竟然发现里面只有8个ETH虚拟地址，这个缺少的地址0xBe717d2e64a6660FE9a9a18c5d93483633b4c134，便存储着100.09个以太坊、403607.8788个USDC的虚拟货币，合人民币数百万元。

However, when the defense lawyers opened the file “Liang Liang Virtual Coin Wallet Currency Balance Information.xlsx” from the case file, they shockingly discovered that it only contained eight ETH virtual addresses, not nine as initially recorded. The missing address, 0xBe717d2e64a6660FE9a9a18c5d93483633b4c134, was the one holding the substantial amount of virtual currency — 100.09 Ethereum and 403607.8788 USDC, amounting to several million yuan in value.

2021年4月30日，公安又到看守所见梁亮，要求他在一份《虚拟资产扣押情况告知表》上签字，这份告知表相比于之前的“梁亮虚拟钱币包币种余额信息.xlsx”居然又少了几个地址，先前记载的三个BTC（比特币）虚拟地址全部消失，其中36xuD2dSZzdVoHw2K6DXeZrUWtooBMSQ9i这个地址存有20.00055611个BTC（比特币），合人民币数百万元。

On April 30, 2021, the police visited Liang Liang at the detention center and requested him to sign a “Virtual Asset Confiscation Notification Form.” Remarkably, this notification form, compared to the previously mentioned “Liang Liang Virtual Coin Wallet Currency Balance Information.xlsx” file, had even fewer addresses listed. The three previously recorded BTC (Bitcoin) virtual addresses were all missing, including the address 36xuD2dSZzdVoHw2K6DXeZrUWtooBMSQ9i, which contained 20.00055611 BTC (Bitcoins), equivalent to several million yuan.

也就是说，在无锡公安侦查本案的过程中，至少有价值一千万的虚拟货币在一开始便被故意隐匿了。

This means that during the investigation of this case by the Wuxi police, at least ten million yuan worth of virtual currency was intentionally concealed from the beginning.

更离谱的是，这份《虚拟资产扣押情况告知表》里记载的扣押虚拟货币的13个地址居然是连号的。众所周知，虚拟货币的存储地址是由英文字母（大小写）、阿拉伯数字随机组成的，而这份告知表记载的13个42位虚拟地址中的前37位、后3位完全一样，第38位、第39位出现了10–22的连号。

Even more absurdly, the 13 addresses for confiscated virtual currencies listed in the “Virtual Asset Confiscation Notification Form” were sequential numbers. As is commonly known, virtual currency storage addresses are randomly composed of English letters (both uppercase and lowercase) and Arabic numerals. However, in this notification form, the first 37 characters and the last 3 characters of the 13 recorded 42-character virtual addresses were exactly the same, and only the 38th and 39th characters displayed sequential numbers from 10 to 22.

获得13个连号的42位随机字符的概率有多少呢？反正以人类目前的算力，从宇宙大爆炸开始算到现在也得不到。

The probability of obtaining 13 consecutive, identical 42-character random sequences in the context of virtual currency addresses is astronomically low, to the point of being practically impossible with current human computational capabilities. Virtual currency addresses, especially those for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, are generated through cryptographic algorithms that ensure each address is unique and randomly generated. The likelihood of even two addresses being identical, let alone 13 with such a specific pattern, is exceedingly rare.

而经过验证，辩护律师不出意外地发现除了第一个地址之外其他所有的地址都是假的。

Upon verification, the defense lawyers unsurprisingly found that all the addresses listed, except for the first one, were fake.

三、被转移的虚拟货币 Transferred Virtual Currency

那么这些被隐匿地址中的虚拟货币去了哪呢？

So, where did the virtual currency in the hidden addresses go?

前面说过，公安掌握了虚拟地址和电子钱包助记词，就已经控制了其中的虚拟货币，在统计数量后就要将它们转移到公安自己控制的地址里。而虚拟货币的特点便是每一笔交易的时间、金额、地址都能通过公开渠道检索、验证，通过在区块链浏览器上的检索，本案中公安转移虚拟币的过程从2021年4月15日一直持续到2021年5月12日。尤其在4月21日、22日这两天里，无锡公安进行了多笔虚拟货币的转移，“巧合”的是隐匿地址中的虚拟货币也在同一时间段被转移了：

As mentioned earlier, once the police had access to the virtual addresses and the mnemonic phrases of the digital wallets, they effectively controlled the virtual currency within. After tallying the amounts, they were supposed to transfer these assets to addresses controlled by the police themselves. A key characteristic of virtual currency is that every transaction, including its time, amount, and addresses, can be searched and verified through public channels.

By conducting searches on blockchain explorers, it was found that the process of transferring virtual currency by the police in this case continued from April 15, 2021, until May 12, 2021. Notably, on April 21 and 22, the Wuxi police carried out multiple transfers of virtual currency. Coincidentally, the virtual currency in the hidden addresses was also transferred during the same period.

（1）2021年4月15日23:12，无锡公安将自梁亮处扣押的虚拟货币10个USDC转入公安控制的地址0x499719e699ABc518Ee8e66DDA6E5ecb95fA10Dba。

(1) On April 15, 2021, at 23:12, the Wuxi police transferred 10 USDC, a virtual currency confiscated from Liang Liang, into an address controlled by the police, 0x499719e699ABc518Ee8e66DDA6E5ecb95fA10Dba.

（2）2021年4月21日 08:47，无锡公安将自同案被告王阳处扣押的虚拟货币0.01个BTC转入公安控制的地址bc1q9px96p0sqzkumahdcpa2r79snvn3afq3d7y2mr。

(2) On April 21, 2021, at 08:47, the Wuxi police transferred 0.01 BTC, a virtual currency confiscated from Wang Yang, a co-defendant in the same case, into a police-controlled address, bc1q9px96p0sqzkumahdcpa2r79snvn3afq3d7y2mr.

（3）2021年4月22日03:13，被隐匿的地址0xBe717d2e64a6660FE9a9a18c5d93483633b4c134中存储的403607.8788个USDC被转移，接收地址为0xf94961b588dbe213c07a8e58b3fa7c2577c66f4d。

(3) On April 22, 2021, at 03:13, the 403607.8788 USDC stored in the previously hidden address 0xBe717d2e64a6660FE9a9a18c5d93483633b4c134 were transferred to the address 0xf94961b588dbe213c07a8e58b3fa7c2577c66f4d.

（4）2021年4月22日03:19，同一个地址中存储的100.09个ETH被转移，接收地址同样为0xf94961b588dbe213c07a8e58b3fa7c2577c66f4d。

(4) On April 22, 2021, at 03:19, the same address 0xBe717d2e64a6660FE9a9a18c5d93483633b4c134 was used to transfer 100.09 ETH, with the receiving address also being 0xf94961b588dbe213c07a8e58b3fa7c2577c66f4d.

（5）2021年4月22日04:01，被隐匿的地址36xuD2dSZzdVoHw2K6DXeZrUWtooBMSQ9i中存储的的20.00055611个BTC被转移，接收地址为3CR5Ev2Buiu2yGPxnCp7PkmUa5pmzqyDo。

(5) On April 22, 2021, at 04:01, the 20.00055611 BTC stored in another previously hidden address, 36xuD2dSZzdVoHw2K6DXeZrUWtooBMSQ9i, were transferred to the address 3CR5Ev2Buiu2yGPxnCp7PkmUa5pmzqyDo.

（6）2021年4月22日07:09，无锡公安将自王阳处扣押的虚拟资产12.15925466个BTC转移，接收地址为bc1q9px96p0sqzkumahdcpa2r79snvn3afq3d7y2mr。

（6）2021年4月22日07:09，无锡公安将自王阳处扣押的虚拟资产12.15925466个BTC转移，接收地址为bc1q9px96p0sqzkumahdcpa2r79snvn3afq3d7y2mr。

（7）2021年4月22日08:18，无锡公安将自王阳处扣押的虚拟资产10.01303860个BTC转移，接收地址同样为bc1q9px96p0sqzkumahdcpa2r79snvn3afq3d7y2mr。同日下午，无锡公安又将自王阳处扣押的其他种类虚拟资产转入公安收账地址。

(7) On April 22, 2021, at 08:18, the Wuxi police transferred 10.01303860 BTC of virtual assets confiscated from Wang Yang, with the receiving address again being bc1q9px96p0sqzkumahdcpa2r79snvn3afq3d7y2mr. Later the same day, the Wuxi police also transferred other types of virtual assets confiscated from Wang Yang into their own collection address.

很显然，被隐匿地址中的虚拟货币的转移，和登记在册的、无锡公安承认存在的地址中的虚拟货币的转移，是一个持续的、连贯的过程。

It’s quite evident that the transfer of virtual currency from the hidden addresses, as well as the transfer of virtual currency from the officially registered and acknowledged addresses by the Wuxi police, is a continuous and coherent process. This pattern of asset movement indicates a systematic approach to managing the seized virtual currencies. The linkage between the transfers from both the hidden and acknowledged addresses suggests a coordinated effort in handling these assets.

四、嫌疑 Suspicion

面对巨额扣押财产的失踪，无锡公安是如何解释的呢？

Facing the disappearance of a huge amount of confiscated property, how did the Wuxi police explain it?

2021年5月3日，无锡市公安局网安支队出具了一份《情况说明》，说他们在抓获梁亮时便对其持有的各类虚拟货币的数量进行了现场登记，4月29日决定对梁亮的虚拟货币进行转移保存，才发现地址36xuD2dSZzdVoHw2K6DXeZrUWtooBMSQ9i（也就是被隐匿的第二个地址）中存储的20.00055611个BTC已经全部被转走了，而由于区块链虚拟货币的特殊性，掌握虚拟货币钱包所对应的助记词即可控制该钱包中的所有虚拟货币，“本案中无法排除其他人员与梁亮共同持有该钱包的情况”。

On May 3, 2021, the Cybersecurity Brigade of the Wuxi City Public Security Bureau issued a “Situation Explanation.” They stated that when they arrested Liang Liang, they had registered the quantities of various types of virtual currencies he possessed on the spot. On April 29, they decided to transfer and preserve Liang Liang’s virtual currencies, only to find that the 20.00055611 BTC stored in the address 36xuD2dSZzdVoHw2K6DXeZrUWtooBMSQ9i (the second hidden address) had already been transferred elsewhere. Due to the unique nature of blockchain virtual currencies, controlling the mnemonic phrase corresponding to a virtual currency wallet allows control over all the virtual currencies in that wallet. The report mentioned, “In this case, it cannot be ruled out that other individuals, along with Liang Liang, had joint possession of this wallet.”

这个说法显然是站不住脚的。首先，无锡公安并不是在4月29日才决定转移虚拟货币的，4月15日他们便将梁亮的10个USDC转到自己控制的地址中；其次，既然这个存有20.00055611个BTC的地址是公安承认存在的，并在4月29日发现币被转走了，那为什么在4月30日要梁亮签字的《虚拟资产扣押情况告知表》里却没有这个地址呢？其三，这三笔虚拟货币是在无锡公安操作资产转移的同一时间段内被转走的，是谁干的可以这么巧？最后，为什么无锡公安对20.00055611个BTC进行说明，却对一开始就被隐匿的100.09个ETH、403607.8788个USDC只字不提呢？要知道这三笔虚拟货币在梁亮的钱包里对应的是同一组助记词，同样在2021年4月22日凌晨被转移，无锡公安既然发现了BTC丢失，就不可能没发现同一时间发生的ETH和USDC丢失。

The explanation provided by the Wuxi police is clearly problematic for several reasons:

1. Timing of the Transfer: The Wuxi police claimed they decided to transfer the virtual currency on April 29, but they had already transferred 10 USDC from Liang Liang’s wallet to their controlled address on April 15. This inconsistency in the timeline raises questions about the accuracy and honesty of their statement.
2. Missing Address in the Notification Form: Despite acknowledging the existence of the address containing 20.00055611 BTC and discovering the transfer of these funds on April 29, this particular address was notably absent in the “Virtual Asset Confiscation Notification Form” that Liang Liang was asked to sign on April 30. This omission is suspicious and lacks transparency.
3. Simultaneous Transfer of Assets: The three cryptocurrency transactions (BTC, ETH, and USDC) were all transferred within the same time frame that the Wuxi police were moving assets. This coincidence suggests the involvement of someone with intimate knowledge and control of these operations, casting doubt on the assertion that an unknown third party was responsible.
4. Selective Disclosure of Information: The Wuxi police provided an explanation for the missing BTC but failed to mention the initially hidden 100.09 ETH and 403607.8788 USDC, even though they were also transferred on the same day as the BTC. Given that these currencies were linked to the same mnemonic phrase and wallet as the BTC, it’s implausible that the police would notice the disappearance of the BTC without also noticing the missing ETH and USDC.

更诡异的是，无锡公安在2021年5月3日出具这份丢币的说明后并没有对其立案侦查，直到2023年在梁亮等人和辩护律师的持续控告下才声称立案，并锁定了梁亮远在美国、一直为他鸣冤的弟弟为犯罪嫌疑人。这就奇了怪了，无锡公安既然2021年就知道丢了币，为什么在长达两年的时间里毫无作为？立案侦查不是一张嘴说的，是要拿出证明嫌疑的证据、拿出正式立案手续的，可是直到现在无锡公安也没有拿出一页案卷材料，甚至连所谓的“立案”也是通过检察院口头告知的。

The situation becomes even more bizarre considering the actions, or lack thereof, taken by the Wuxi police following the issuance of their statement on May 3, 2021, about the missing coins. Despite being aware of the lost virtual currency as early as 2021, they did not initiate a formal investigation into this loss until 2023. This delay raises serious questions about their conduct and response to the situation. Investigations in such cases are not just a matter of making a statement; they require tangible evidence and formal procedures, none of which appear to have been adequately pursued by the Wuxi police. Furthermore, it’s peculiar that they only verbally communicated the so-called “filing of the case” through the prosecutor’s office without providing any substantial case file documentation.

更为重要的是，无锡公安在4月14日抓捕梁亮、控制了虚拟货币，却（按照他们自己的说法）在半个月后的4月30日才开始转移虚拟货币，就算真的是别人转走了币，这么迟缓的行动速度至少也是玩忽职守，如果是自己人干的那更是监守自盗。无论如何，无锡公安自己就是嫌疑人，丢币这件事根本就不该让他们自己查，而应该由检察机关或监察机关来查。

Moreover, there are serious concerns about the Wuxi police’s handling of the virtual currencies from the start. They arrested Liang Liang and gained control over the virtual currencies on April 14, 2021, but allegedly did not begin transferring these currencies until April 30, 2021. This slow response could be seen as negligence at best and, if the police themselves were involved in the transfer, could amount to embezzlement. Either way, the Wuxi police themselves are suspects in the disappearance of the currency, and it seems inappropriate for them to investigate the case independently. Ideally, this matter should be investigated by an external prosecutorial or supervisory body to ensure impartiality and thoroughness in the investigation.

五、总结 Summary

总结来说，整件事情的脉络非常清晰：在无锡公安的侦查活动一开始，价值上千万人民币的虚拟货币便已经被隐藏起来，在无锡公安转移其他扣押资产的同时，被隐藏的虚拟货币也被一并转移到别处，而在发现丢笔后两年多的时间里无锡公安毫无作为，被告人和律师持续控告后，被告人的弟弟突然成了偷币的嫌疑人，而丢币这件事其实根本就不该无锡公安自己查。

To summarize, the sequence of events in this case is quite clear:

1. Initial Concealment: At the outset of the Wuxi police’s investigation, virtual currencies worth tens of millions of yuan were already hidden.
2. Simultaneous Transfer: As the Wuxi police were transferring other confiscated assets, the hidden virtual currencies were also moved elsewhere.
3. Inaction and Delay: Over two years after the disappearance of the currencies, the Wuxi police showed no significant action. Only after continuous allegations by the defendants and their lawyers did the police claim to start an investigation.
4. Sudden Suspect: The brother of the accused, who had been advocating for Liang Liang from the United States, was suddenly named as a suspect in the theft of the currencies.
5. Questionable Investigation: The investigation into the missing currencies arguably should not have been conducted by the Wuxi police themselves due to the inherent conflict of interest.

事实的真相已经呼之欲出了，无锡乃至江苏的检察、监察机关到底能不能履行职责，我们拭目以待。

The truth of the matter seems to be emerging, and there is an anticipation to see whether the prosecutorial and supervisory authorities in Wuxi and Jiangsu will fulfill their responsibilities in investigating and clarifying this case. The situation calls for an unbiased and thorough examination by these higher authorities to ensure justice and accountability.