Why keep Bitcoin around?

CleanApp
CleanApp
Nov 8, 2019 · 3 min read
Image for post
Image for post

By this point, everyone in crypto should see that “money” is an existential issue for states and corporations, and that states will not relinquish their monetary power voluntarily — not to crypto-native developers, and not to corporate cartels like Libra:

Image for post
Image for post

For more background in the US context, please see:

A typical crypto-native response is crypto’s indefatigability: “See, states are beginning to realize that cryptocurrencies are potent competition, because we are!”

  • Bitlievers proclaim that cryptocurrencies are superior money. Therefore, ‘the market’ will inevitably choose crypto.
  • Some argue that crypto will win the money war of attrition, at which point people may not have a choice but to use crypto. Many crypto folks (though, not all) may believe the Euro and USD will collapse, and related eschatological (end-times) reasons. And the sharpest and most valuable tool in the shed will be … say… Bitcoin.
Image for post
Image for post

But this begs the question: if faced with an existential choice between relinquishing monetary control or attacking Bitcoin, why wouldn’t incumbents simply outlaw or otherwise try to capture Bitcoin?

This is the biggest existential question for any limited-utility blockchain tool.

The question is NOT whether states have already done this. The question is NOT whether states/corporations can do this (e.g., whether, say, Bitcoin is inherently uncapturable). The question is much more simple:

Why wouldn’t a state or private competitor to Bitcoin simply try to capture the Bitcoin network? Either through legal/regulatory channels, or via an outright hostile takeover?

Thus far, nobody wants to answer this question publicly.

That’s a shame because there’s no shortage of diehard bitlievers who will stop at nothing to emphasize Bitcoin supremacy. If that’s the case, this should be an easy question for them to answer (and then defend from critiques).

For instance, FB today has more than $50B in cash reserves and is launching its own money. Assume it’s 2023 and Libra is trending well.

What are the rational economic reasons for FB to keep networks like Bitcoin around?

Image for post
Image for post

Can you answer this? Do you see the value in having your answer(s) challenged? If so, please drop a response below, and we’ll get to work.

[This is an expanded excerpt from another piece on blockchain incentives, called Blocks Over Knives]

Crypto Law Review

A journal pushing the bounds of our legal imaginaries…

CleanApp

Written by

CleanApp

Nonprofit incentivizing open-source trash/hazard reporting & remediation ++ cool law stuff ++ "The Wi-Fi & Bluetooth of TrashTech" - cleanapp.io.

Crypto Law Review

A journal pushing the bounds of our legal imaginaries, on-chain, off-chain, and against the chain.

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store