AI art

Rome is for Walking, Barcelona is for Cycling: Why Can’t We Just Combine These Two Cities Everywhere?

AI Urban Design Chronicles

Michael Filimowicz, PhD
Cycle Sage
Published in
3 min readFeb 25, 2024

--

In the discourse of urban design and city planning, the quest for creating spaces that cater to human scale and foster sustainable modes of transport is paramount. This essay explores the exemplary urban fabrics of Rome and Barcelona, cities that epitomize the pinnacle of walkability and cyclability, respectively. By distilling the essence of these urban paradigms, we can glean valuable insights that could inform the design of future cities, merging the best of both worlds to enhance urban livability.

Rome, with its undulating topography and rich tapestry of historical layers, offers an unparalleled pedestrian experience. The city’s famous hills provide not only a physical challenge that invigorates the walker but also afford breathtaking vistas, interlacing the natural with the built environment.

Rome’s streets are a living museum, where every corner turned unveils architectural marvels, sculptural grandeur, and artistic opulence. The pedestrian is immersed in a sensory journey through time, engaging with the city’s heritage at a human pace that allows for contemplation and appreciation. This walkability is not merely a byproduct of ancient urban design but a conscious preservation of public spaces that prioritize the pedestrian experience over vehicular dominance.

Conversely, Barcelona presents an exemplary model of urban cycling infrastructure. The city’s commitment to providing safe, accessible, and extensive cycling lanes has fostered a culture where bicycles are a primary mode of transport. These lanes, meticulously segregated from motor traffic and pedestrian pathways, ensure the safety and convenience of cyclists, thereby encouraging more residents to embrace cycling as a daily practice.

Moreover, Barcelona’s integration of cycling with its efficient metro system exemplifies a holistic approach to multi-modal transport, facilitating greater mobility and flexibility for cyclists to traverse the city. The city’s grid plan, a legacy of modernist and rationalist urban planning, offers a predictability and regularity that benefits cyclists and contributes to a coherent and navigable urban landscape.

The dichotomy between Rome’s walkability and Barcelona’s cyclability presents a compelling narrative for urban designers and city planners. The former illustrates the profound impact of historical context, topography, and cultural heritage on pedestrian-oriented urban design, while the latter showcases the potential of contemporary planning principles to promote cycling through dedicated infrastructure and integrated transport systems.

In synthesizing the virtues of both cities, urban designers can aspire to create environments that embrace the human scale, encourage sustainable modes of transport, and enrich the urban experience. This entails not merely replicating the physical attributes of Rome and Barcelona but abstracting the underlying principles that make them exemplary: the prioritization of non-motorized transport, the celebration of public spaces, and the integration of transport modalities.

The fusion of Rome’s walkability with Barcelona’s cyclability offers a visionary blueprint for future urban development. By embracing the lessons from these cities, planners and designers can cultivate urban spaces that promote health, sustainability, and a deeper connection with the city’s cultural and historical essence. The challenge lies in adapting these principles to diverse urban contexts, ensuring that the unique character of each city is preserved while enhancing its livability and accessibility for all.

--

--