Situating PeaceTech: Takeaways from the Inaugural Global PeaceTech Conference
Takeaways and highlights from the first Global PeaceTech Conference.
Last week, the Global PeaceTech Hub, an initiative of the EUI School of Transnational Governance, the University of Lucerne, and The GovLab, hosted its flagship conference in Florence, Italy, to bring together experts to explore how technology can enhance peace as well as avenues to drive short- and long-term peace with technology and digital governance.
‘PeaceTech’ is a new term that broadly refers to any type of technology that can be used to support peacebuilding, peacemaking, peacekeeping, and peace enforcement efforts. Given the field’s broad remit, the conference acted as a first step to defining PeaceTech and understanding the nuances of PeaceTech applications and research.
The conference was attended by peace practitioners and scholars from different PeaceTech labs, research institutes, non-profit organizations governments, and companies to discuss the parameters of PeaceTech, its ethical, social, and practical considerations, as well as avenues for further education and development of the field.
The event also marked the first KluzPrize for PeaceTech, an initiative supported by Artur Kluz, Founder and CEO of Kluz Ventures, which was awarded to a project that demonstrates exceptional potential in applying emerging technologies to positively impact transnational peace and cooperation. Juan Carlos Lucero, Co-Founder of the Magnolia Foundation, received the award to further his organization’s School of Peace, a multidisciplinary approach to teaching peace, mediation, and rehabilitation.
Over two days, participants presented their research, applications, and initiatives on PeaceTech and sought to imagine sustainable and ethics-focused future directions for the field. The GovLab presented its “PeaceTech Topic Map: A Research Base for an Emerging Field,” an overview of the key themes and challenges of technologies used by and created for peace efforts.
From the conference, we identified five key takeaways, namely:
- There is a growing community associated with PeaceTech. Efforts, including the Global PeaceTech Conference, are needed to name and fame peace scholars, practitioners, and private sector champions working in PeaceTech. Conference attendees noted the need for more government representatives and private sector actors to be at the table so as to identify the many areas where PeaceTech is manifested and applicable and show what effective and diverse PeaceTech work looks like.
- There is a thin line between MilitaryTech and PeaceTech. Many conversations noted the dual-use nature of technologies such as AI and social media to exacerbate violence or facilitate peace. Much of the funding for technology development and use in fragile zones comes from military and weapons-related institutions, which can skew initial aspirations and functionalities of technology tools used in peacebuilding and peacekeeping operations.
- PeaceTech needs to go from theory to action. Much of the extant research on PeaceTech is descriptive. Researchers would benefit from more diagnostic and prescriptive work to understand what actually works in PeaceTech. At present, PeaceTech applications remain limited in scope and scale, making it difficult for the larger community to pilot practical tools.
- ‘Low tech’ applications can be more effective than ‘high tech’ systems to enable peace. Policymakers and peacebuilders can benefit from using the technology tools they have and are already in use by the communities they serve, even if they are not the most technologically sophisticated to enhance peacebuilding initiatives. Oftentimes, tools that are familiar and easy to use have a better chance of facilitating peace efforts.
- Coordination and implementation of data and technology governance are essential for PeaceTech. There is an urgent need for policymakers across local, national, and international to align their criteria for conflict intervention, ethical use of technology, and understanding of the cyber domain. The current lack of awareness and coordination leads to missed uses of technology to advance peace and demonstrates policy failings to proactively promote people’s well-being.
To kick off the conference, individuals from the public, private, and non-profit spaces discussed key challenges, triumphs, and questions facing the use of technology in peacekeeping and building efforts.
- Cameran Ashraf, Human Rights Lead at the Wikimedia Foundation and Co-Founder of AccessNow introduced the growing problem of “entryism,” wherein disinformation agents distort trust in online spaces by becoming pillars of a digital community over time and then spreading false narratives. He discussed how Russian/Belarussian agents have weaponized collaborative editing and forum spaces to spread disinformation about the Russia-Ukraine War.
- Elizabeth Crossick, Head of Government Affairs EU and Global Policy Lead AI at RELX presented the eyeWitness to Atrocities app, an Android app that time- and geo-stamps user-captured pictures of human atrocities and uploads them to a secure server to create a legally-admissable chain of custody for the evidence.
- Helena Puig Larrauri, Strategy Lead & Co-founder at Build-Up then turned to the classification, application, regulation, and implementation of peace technologies, stating that PeaceTech “is neither good nor bad, but it is political.” She argued that the focus on ‘high tech’ is misdirected and that peace practitioners should focus on useable, ‘low tech’ for better uptake and action.
Defining (Global) PeaceTech
In the next session, members of the Global PeaceTech Hub presented their initiatives to scope and set the agenda for the field.
- Kalypso Nicolaïdis, Chair in Global Affairs at the EUI School of Transnational Governance, and Michele Giovanardi, Coordinator of the Global PeaceTech Hub outlined their definition of Global PeaceTech as a “field of analysis applied to all processes connecting local and global practices aimed at achieving social and political peace through the responsible use of frontier technologies.” They demonstrated how Global PeaceTech stands in the middle of power asymmetries between different sectoral actors, ideas and material tools, and interests.
- Stefaan Verhulst, Co-Founder and Chief Research Officer of The GovLab and Uma Kalkar, Researcher at The GovLab, along with Andrea Renda, Adjunct Professor of Digital Policy at the EUI School of Transnational Governance presented the methodology and findings of the “PeaceTech Topic Map: A Research Base for an Emerging Field.” They outlined the six overarching categories of where PeaceTech is applied and the challenges that the field faces, specifically with regard to dual-use technologies and poor existing oversight and regulation.
- Lucia Bosoer, Project Associate at the Global PeaceTech Hub, and Michele Giovanardi, Coordinator of the Global PeaceTech Hub debuted the Global PeaceTech Atlas, a repository of existing PeaceTech initiatives organized by country to understand who is carrying out PeaceTech and where.
- Evelyne Tauchnitz, Senior Researcher at the Institute of Social Ethics ISE, University of Lucerne discussed the ethical and theoretical framework against which PeaceTech should be gauged, pointing to the need for human rights to be set as the minimal ethical standard.
The Many Ways to PeaceTech
Peace experts then discussed the ways in which they have incubated PeaceTech actions, as well as the challenges and avenues of further research they have to consider.
- Lisa Schirch, Professor of Peace Studies at the Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies at the University of Notre Dame discussed the business case (or rather, lack thereof) for creating peace on digital platforms. She touched on the inherent design of platforms as “Gladiator arenas” to amplify polarizing and hateful content in order to generate likes and profits, and how efforts to regulate content have been met with contempt from users.
- Sheldon Himelfarb, CEO of the PeaceTech Lab mentioned an initiative to create an ‘International Panel on the Information Environment’ akin to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to tackle the growing social and political threats posed by misinformation and hate speech.
- Christine Bell, Director and Principal Investigator at PeaceRep at the University of Edinburgh showed her lab’s peace process trackers, which use data to visualize peace agreements and building processes. She showed the messy, back-and-forth nature of the “peace-conflict continuum.” She concluded with a look towards better, more ethical data gathering and sharing to improve peace insights.
- Lisa Glybchenko, Founder of Color Up Peace showcased how she combines technology and art to create a “digital visuality” of peace in conflict-affected zones and imagine futures of peace.
The conference also featured three concurrent workshop sessions on different aspects of PeaceTech, including AI ethics, cyber peace, and peacebuilding tools.
Towards Ethical Design and Implementation of AI in Peacebuilding
- Branka Panic, AI for Peace
- Andrea Renda, EUI School of Transnational Governance
- Evelyne Tauchnitz, University of Lucerne — Institute of Social Ethics ISE
- Stefaan Verhulst, The GovLab
Branka Panic, Founder and Executive Director of AI for Peace led a panel discussion on the need to explore existing AI ethics practices and discover gaps and offer solutions for AI ethics issues around PeaceTech. She focused on the principle to ‘do no harm’ and ‘conflict sensitivity’ practices to assess and upgrade tools to be more peaceful and discussed the efficacy of these tools for ethical AI for peace.
Evelyne mentioned the need to think about who bears responsibility for the deployment of AI, noting that the onus for ethical use falls to humans. Andrea gave an overview of the existing landscape of AI ethics frameworks created by the US government, OECD, Council of Europe, and other high-level sources. He concluded with the need for a “PeaceTech by design” approach to AI ethics principles that stress-test the trustworthiness, robustness, and ethical nature of an AI system. Lastly, Stefaan introduced the responsibility of ‘non-use,’ arguing that a lack of technology implementation in order to ‘do no harm’ where the technology could be useful is as dangerous as deploying unethical tools. He called for policymakers to consider not only the misuse of technology to guide AI ethics but also its missed use and subsequent consequences.
Cyber Peace: Cooperating for the Stability and Security of the Cyber Domain
- Andrea Calderaro, Centre for Internet and Global Politics, Cardiff University
- Francesca Bosco, Cyber Peace Institute
- Madeline Carr, University College London
- Martin Koyabe, AU-GFCE Project
- Vladimir Radunovic, DiploFoundation
Andrea Calderaro, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Fellow, Associate Professor in International Relations, and Director of the Centre for Internet and Global Politics at Cardiff University moderated this panel on the challenges and opportunities of cyber diplomacy. He asked the panel about what international cooperation means with respect to cyber security and if the existing venues and tools available in the cyber domain were sufficient for transnational governance and peacebuilding.
Madeline began by stating how typical instruments of diplomacy are not well suited for the cyber domain. She noted the slow pace at which existing diplomacy processes move, and how this is mismatched when compared to technological progress. A first step to rectifying this issue, she argued, is to build consensus and a shared understanding of the issues affecting peace. Francesca complemented this stance by mentioning the potential for civil society and advocacy organizations to identify, assess, and monitor existing and potential cyber threats and improve existing international cyber security governance. She called for international organizations to co-design cyber peace initiatives with civil society rather than just consult with them. Next, Martin noted that standards to support value chains remain an important and unaddressed issue when it comes to implementing cyber diplomacy initiatives. He called on the need for better knowledge sharing, which Vladimir expanded on by introducing the notion of inclusive and representative cyber diplomats to work across sectors and agencies to achieve change.
PeaceTech Toolkit for Peacebuilding in the 21st Century
- Gilbert Beyamba, Pollicy
- Krystel Tabet, Build Up
- Alexander Young, Peace Tech Lab
Krystel kicked off the workshop with an overview of Build Up’s Phoenix tool, an open-source, non-commercial tool that helps peacebuilders use social media data ethically. The tool draws on the concept of ‘social listening,’ an engagement strategy that sources online reviews and discourse around products to improve targeting and sales. Krystel discussed how Build Up applies social (media) listening to gauge online narratives and harness information about comments, posts, and shares in order to understand where polarization occurs, what groups facilitate hate speech, and how peacebuilders can tailor their responses.
Next, Gilbert presented Digital Safe-Tea, a digital security game Pollicy created to train African women to protect themselves against hate online. The game features multiple avatars and scenarios of online challenges women face, along with resources to educate on and address online threats.
Lastly, Alexander walked through the PeaceTech Lab’s tailored training sessions, which unlock the power of low tech to help participants not only collect data but to tell a story from the information they gather. Specifically, he discussed the US ‘Road to Equal Justice’ training session, which hosted 39 participants from 28 organizations to learn how to leverage easily accessible and familiar survey and data collection tools, data analysis and visualization, and social media strategies to advance their racial equity and justice work.
Investing in PeaceTech
The final session of the conference looked at avenues for sustainable, long-term growth and investment in PeaceTech.
- Margarita Quihuis, Executive Director of the Peace Innovation Lab framed peace as a service that can facilitate better behavior between parties. Margarita referred to Peace Dot, an initiative that used Facebook to facilitate friendships across groups that historically have had conflict with each other, and Play Nice, a project to bolster healthy online communities. Her findings showed how online platforms can enable prosocial, peaceful behaviors.
- Mark Nelson, Co-Founder and Director of Innovation of the Peace Innovation Lab then discussed the financing of peace-related work, noting that much of this work has been supported by military organizations, which bias the agenda for peace and initiate the dual-use nature of peace technologies. He introduced the notion of peace finance, which encourages the creation of profit-generating peace efforts to create an investable portfolio of peace capital and put the global market in the service of peace.
The 2022 Global PeaceTech Conference marks the start of guided conversations and deliberation around peace in the modern day and the technologies that can enable and diminish it. Stay updated on the Global PeaceTech Hub’s work here and for ways to get involved in PeaceTech, please contact Michele Giovanardi at email@example.com.
About The GovLab
The Governance Lab’s mission is to improve people’s lives by changing the way we govern. Our goal at The GovLab is to strengthen the ability of institutions — including but not limited to governments — and people to work more openly, collaboratively, effectively, and legitimately to make better decisions and solve public problems. We believe that increased availability and use of data, new ways to leverage the capacity, intelligence, and expertise of people in the problem-solving process, combined with new advances in technology and science, can transform governance. We approach each challenge and opportunity in an interdisciplinary, collaborative way, irrespective of the problem, sector, geography, and level of government. For more information, visit thegovlab.org
About the EUI School of Transnational Governance
The School of Transnational Governance was established in 2017 as part of the European University Institute in Florence. In the cradle of the Renaissance, we teach, train and learn by providing a platform where transnational policy actors across politics, business, civil society, media and academia meet. We are here for anyone with an open and independent mind, for thinkers and for doers. We bring together some of the best teachers, trainers and policy-makers from around the world. We believe the goal of public policy is to bring out the best in people. For more information, visit www.eui.eu/en/academic-units/school-of-transnational-governance
About the University of Lucerne Institute of Social Ethics (ISE)
The Institute of Social Ethics ISE undertakes research and teaching in social ethics. This includes scientific reflection on the ethical dimension of social contexts, challenges and issues. Institutions, structures, and systems are the focal point. On this scientific basis, the ISE is a dialogue partner for politics, business, civil society and the media on a local, regional, national, and international level. For more information, visit www.unilu.ch/en/faculties/faculty-of-theology/institutes-and-research-units/institute-of-social-ethics-ise