Michael Hurt
Deconstructing Korea
3 min readAug 22, 2018

--

Fashion Field Notes from Danang

That shirt made her pull her aside for an interview and pic. She didn’t think of it as “Korean” herself, but it turns out she bought it in a brick and mortar store called L-Seoul. She said she bought it because it was “just pretty.” I found this very interesting and indicative of a pattern I was finding as I interviewed more folks there doing what I saw as Korea-influenced things.

As an ethnographer, I’m always thinking about people, the groups they see themselves as part of, and the way they define discrete cultures. As a visual sociologist, I think about our extremely visual culture in which identity and the very important economic acts of consumption that define our place and worth in society are all focused through images and acts of display. And in this sense, in a modern society in which identity is so largely marked by visual cues and a self that is mediated through visual media — by seeing and being seen — fashion as both a marker and means of forming identity should be top priority for sociologists.

But in Korea, ethnography is still the red-headed stepchild of methodology. And I don’t mean easy-to-make surveys that you pass out to your other professor friends to make their students fill out, or asking five people who were referred to you to do some interviews to confirm existing suppositions, but really getting one’s figurative hands dirty by going out into the street with a few notions of what’s going on, bouncing them against reality, honing new notions of what’s going on, and then continuing until you have a clearer sense of the field.

Last November, I went to Saigon for a conference and and before I left, a couple Vietnamese studentst urged me to chek out what was happening with Korean street fashion and hallyu there. They told me something was going on there and I had to make sense of it. I trusted my students’ judgement, which was partially based on their application of readings and theory from the class on observations made in the street. So I decided to take some historical/cultural context with me, along with fresh, newbie eyes, to Saigon and apply street fashion photpgraphy as a sort of methodology to track the influence/flow of Korean style in Vietnam.

In this “Fashion Field Notes” series, I invite the reader to look at not only my writing and argument, but at the data itself — check out the subjects, the pictures, and the interviews I did, fresh from the field, with a paid translator and cultural interlocutor. Start with my earlier article, if you please.

I went in knowing pretty much knowing nothing and trusting my informants (translators recommended by my students) to tell me where things were and to point me in the right direction. I did the same this time in Danang.

This was an interesting observation that I hadn’t expected. And it led me to the other CGV theater in Danang, which just so happens to be where other cool places where coolness lives there.

After tooling around a bit and taking time to tour and ruminate on and observe people in Danang more, I determined that certain cool coffee houses were good places to stake out to look for Koreanness-as-metonym-for-coolnness amongst Danang people.

In short, it struck me that “Korea” is good as a tool with which to think about or to use as a way to be a cool Asian, about how to aspirationally imagine oneself being cool.

And I found different levels of knowledge about whether one is consciously doing/channeling Korean things, which actually indicates to me the ubiquitousness of “Korean cool,” to use Euny Hong’s term. Whether or not a particular subject is consciously thinking about it, Korean modes or items of cool are considered unquestionably cool.

--

--

Michael Hurt
Deconstructing Korea

A visual sociologist writing, teaching, and shooting in Seoul since 2002.