PM Interview Question →LinkedIn has introduced a new feature for job applicants called the ‘Match Calculator.’ This feature allows users to click on a job post and see a percentage indicating how well their profile matches the job description. How would you measure its success?

Published in

Bootcamp

6 min readJan 7, 2025

Let’s face it — job hunting can feel like throwing darts in the dark. You apply to dozens of roles, unsure if you’re even remotely qualified, and hope something sticks. LinkedIn’s new ‘Match Calculator’ aims to change that. By providing a percentage match between your profile and a job description, it promises to bring clarity to the chaos.

But here’s the catch — how do we know if it’s actually working? As a Product Manager, measuring the success of such a feature isn’t just about vanity metrics. It’s about ensuring that it creates meaningful value for job seekers, recruiters, and LinkedIn as a platform.

In this article, I’ll walk you through the process of crafting a success measurement framework for the Match Calculator, the key metrics to track, and the potential challenges to keep an eye on.

1. Defining Success for the ‘Match Calculator’

To measure success, we first need to clearly define what success looks like. For a feature like this, the primary goals are:

User Value: Does the Match Calculator help users apply to the right jobs, reducing application fatigue and increasing confidence?
Recruiter Value: Does it improve the quality of applicants, reducing the time spent screening unqualified candidates?
Platform Engagement: Does it lead to higher engagement on LinkedIn — more job clicks, longer sessions, and increased job applications?

Essentially, the Match Calculator must drive better application decisions, improve hiring efficiency, and enhance platform stickiness.

2. Key Metrics to Measure Success

1. Application Conversion Rate (ACR):

Definition: Percentage of users who view a job and proceed to apply after seeing their match score.
Why it Matters: A higher conversion rate suggests the match score is building confidence, while a low rate might indicate mismatches or skepticism.

2. Job Click-Through Rate (CTR):

Definition: The increase in job post views after introducing the Match Calculator.
Why it Matters: If users actively engage with jobs that show a higher match score, it reflects feature stickiness and interest.

3. Match Score Accuracy (User Feedback):

Definition: Percentage of users who agree that the match score accurately reflects their skills and experience (measured through post-application surveys).
Why it Matters: Accuracy builds trust. If users consistently feel misrepresented, it could erode confidence in the platform.

4. Application Quality (Recruiter Feedback):

Definition: Recruiter feedback on the relevance of applicants’ profiles, collected through surveys or Net Promoter Score (NPS).
Why it Matters: Recruiters will favor the feature if it reduces irrelevant applications, ultimately benefiting both sides.

5. Repeat Engagement Rate:

Definition: Percentage of users who return to apply for additional jobs after using the Match Calculator.
Why it Matters: Consistent use indicates perceived value and trust in the feature.

6. Job Match-Driven Upsell (Premium Feature Testing):

Definition: Increase in LinkedIn Premium sign-ups if match scores are gated or enhanced for premium users.
Why it Matters: If the feature can drive revenue growth through premium sign-ups, it becomes a valuable monetization lever.

3. Segmentation — Understanding Different User Groups

Measuring overall success is great, but segmenting by user groups provides deeper insights:

New vs. Existing Users: Are new users engaging more with the feature compared to seasoned LinkedIn veterans?
Job Categories and Seniority: Does the feature perform better for certain industries or job levels (entry-level vs. senior roles)?
Region: Are there regional differences in engagement, reflecting variations in job markets or user behavior?

4. Establishing Baseline Metrics

Before launching the Match Calculator, establish baseline metrics for:

Application Rates without the Match Calculator
Recruiter NPS on Applicant Quality (Pre-Launch)
Job Post Click-Through Rates (CTR) Without Matching Insights

This pre-launch data will serve as a benchmark to compare post-launch performance.

5. A/B Testing — Validating Impact

A phased rollout using A/B testing will ensure the feature drives the desired impact.

Test Group: Users who see the match score on job posts.
Control Group: Users who don’t have access to the feature.
Metrics to Compare: Application rates, job post engagement, and recruiter feedback across both groups.

If the test group shows statistically significant improvements, the feature is ready for broader rollout.

6. User Feedback Loops — Continuous Improvement

Introduce feedback mechanisms directly into the Match Calculator:

“Was this match score accurate?” — Users can provide a thumbs-up or thumbs-down, offering real-time feedback.
Open Text Feedback: Users can explain why they felt a match score was inaccurate, helping improve the algorithm.
Iterative Improvements: Use this feedback to continuously refine and improve the matching algorithm, ensuring higher accuracy over time.

7. Potential Risks and Mitigation

1. Mismatch Anxiety:

Risk: Low match scores could discourage users from applying to roles they might still be qualified for.
Mitigation: Provide context around the score (e.g., “You match 60%, but 80% of required skills are learnable on the job”).

2. Algorithmic Bias:

Risk: Bias in the matching algorithm could favor certain demographics or job descriptions.
Mitigation: Regularly audit the algorithm for bias, ensuring fair evaluation across diverse profiles.

3. Feature Fatigue:

Risk: Users might feel overwhelmed by too many job-matching features.
Mitigation: Keep the interface clean and provide users with an option to toggle the feature on/off.

Conclusion

The ‘Match Calculator’ is more than just a percentage — it’s a powerful tool that, when measured correctly, can revolutionize how users approach job applications. By focusing on the right metrics, continuously iterating based on feedback, and mitigating risks, LinkedIn can ensure this feature becomes a core driver of user engagement and platform growth.

As a Product Manager, the ability to craft a data-driven success framework like this not only highlights strategic thinking but also demonstrates a deep understanding of user value and platform economics — a key asset in any PM interview or real-world role.

Thanks for reading! If you’ve got ideas to contribute to this conversation please comment. If you like what you read and want to see more, clap me some love! Follow me here, or connect with me on LinkedIn or Twitter.

Let’a have a 1:1 call → https://topmate.io/rohit_verma_pm