Left vs. Right- Decoding News Bias

Ryan Bargmann
Digital & Media Lit COM 250
6 min readApr 29, 2024

Research Question: How do the framing of political issues and the selection of information differ between left-leaning and right-leaning news sources?

Venn Diagram

Reflection Essay:

Completing this project on exploring the framing of political issues and the selection of information between left-leaning and right-leaning news sources involved several stages of research and creativity. Initially, I compiled a diverse set of sources, ranging from scholarly articles to news reports, to gain a comprehensive understanding of the topic. Through this process, I learned to discern reputable sources and evaluate the credibility of the information presented.

As I delved deeper into the research, I identified common themes and patterns across the sources, which formed the basis for constructing the Venn diagram and script for the accompanying video. The diagram visually represented the differences and similarities between left-leaning and right-leaning sources, while the video script aimed to educate viewers on the nuances of news bias and encourage critical news consumption habits.

Throughout the project, I honed my ability to synthesize complex information into clear and concise content, ensuring that the Venn diagram and video effectively conveyed key concepts to the audience. I also explored creative ways to engage viewers and present information visually, such as using charts and graphics to enhance understanding.

Reflecting on the completion of this project, I learned valuable lessons about my research and creative process. I discovered that I have a knack for synthesizing diverse sources and distilling complex ideas into accessible content. Additionally, I gained confidence in my ability to communicate effectively through multimedia formats, such as diagrams and videos.

However, this project also raised new questions and considerations about media bias and its implications. I found myself pondering how technological advancements and social media algorithms contribute to echo chambers and filter bubbles, reinforcing existing biases and polarizing viewpoints. I also wondered about the role of media literacy education in empowering individuals to critically evaluate news sources and navigate the information landscape more effectively.

In conclusion, completing this project was a rewarding experience that deepened my understanding of media bias and the complexities of news consumption in today’s digital age. It challenged me to think critically about the information I encounter and inspired me to continue exploring the evolving landscape of media and communication. As I continue my journey, I look forward to further investigating these questions and contributing to the discourse on media literacy and informed citizenship.

Annotated Bibliography:

This is a section of a report from the Pew Research Center on how people get their news about government and politics. The report finds that there are stark ideological differences in the sources that people use and in their trust in those sources. I selected this source because it is a reputable source from a non-partisan organization and it provides a good overview of the topic.

The authors found that news organizations tend to use more negative language than positive language in their tweets. This is true for both left-leaning and right-leaning news organizations. I selected this source because it is a scholarly article published in a peer-reviewed journal.

The authors found that undecided voters are younger, less educated, and less engaged in politics than partisans. Also, undecided voters have a mix of policy preferences from both Democrats and Republicans and don’t seem to vote based on policy positions. I selected this source because it appeared unbiased in its presentation of the research and used data to support its claims.

The study conducted explores the influence of partisan media on viewers’ attitudes and opinions. By incentivizing regular Fox News viewers to switch to CNN for a month, the researchers found significant shirts in viewpoints on issues like President Trump’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and racial justice protests. I chose this source because it highlighted the powerful impact of media consumption on individuals’ beliefs and perceptions.

This source discusses the intricacies of media bias, distinguishing between overt bias and more subtle forms such as partisan slant and framing. It highlights how biases can influence public opinion and political beliefs, emphasizing the importance of media literacy and exposure to diverse viewpoints. I selected this source because it provides a comprehensive overview of media bias, offers insights into its impact on individuals and society, and suggests strategies for accessing more balanced and accurate information.

This source delves into the concept of left-leaning framing in media bias, highlighting how news organizations can shape perceptions by framing stories in ways that promote a liberal understanding of the facts. It discusses the psychological effects of framing and provides examples of how liberal media outlets frame issues such as the abortion debate, illustrating how framing can influence audience perceptions and political worldviews. I selected this source because it offers a detailed examination of a specific aspect of media bias and provides concrete examples to elucidate the concept of framing, enhancing understanding of how bias operates within news coverage.

This source challenges the conventional wisdom surrounding media bias analysis, particularly the tendency to categorize news organizations along a left-to-right spectrum. It discusses how such classifications often overlook the nuances of journalistic integrity and the impact of perspective, citing examples from Mother Jones’ own experiences with biased categorization. I selected this source because it offers a critical perspective on how bias can influence perceptions of news outlets and underscores the importance of considering diverse viewpoints in media analysis.

This source critiques Fox News, arguing that it not only propagates misinformation but also fails to provide genuine news coverage. It discusses a study where conservative Fox viewers were paid to watch CNN, revealing that they became more knowledgeable about certain issues not covered by Fox. The author emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between genuine news organizations and those that prioritize partisan agendas over factual reporting. I selected this source because it offers a critical perspective on media bias and highlights the impact of biased news consumption habits on viewers’ understanding of current events.

This article discusses a study that analyzed political news stories from both partisan and nonpartisan media outlets in 2021. It found that extreme bias, whether conservative or liberal, correlated with shorter sentences, less formal language, and a more negative tone. The study suggests that audiences may prefer simpler language, but journalists should strive to provide nuanced coverage even in heavily partisan contexts. I selected this source because it offers valuable insights into media coverage of politics and the challenges faced by journalists in reporting on polarized issues.

This study analyzed 1.8 million news headlines from major US outlets from 2014 to 2022 using machine learning techniques to uncover growing media bias, particularly in coverage of domestic politics and social issues. Researchers found subtle but significant differences in the language used by outlets across the political spectrum, such as the choice between “abortion law” and “abortion rights,” highlighting the importance of understanding these discrepancies for both media outlets and readers. I chose this source because it provides valuable insights into the evolving landscape of media bias and its implications for news consumption.

--

--