Setting a Standard for Digital Public Goods

Lucy Harris
4 min readSep 15, 2020

--

Credit: Photo by William Warby on Unsplash

In June 2020 the Secretary General of the United Nations published the Roadmap for Digital Cooperation which defined digital public goods as “Open source software, open data, open AI models, open standards and open content that adhere to privacy and other applicable international and domestic laws, standards and best practices, and do no harm.”

This definition has been translated into a 9-indicator standard which we hope will serve as a comprehensive, shared definition to promote the discovery, development, use of and investment in digital public goods for a more equitable world.

This standard was developed from the original 51 indicator standard used by the Alliance in the preliminary review of Early Grade Reading projects and refined through the contributions of many experts and diverse stakeholders.

If you know of projects that you believe meet the following standards and should be considered a digital public good, please submit them and share your feedback on the standard in the comments below.

Thank you to: Sean P. Goggins, Professor, College of Engineering at University of Missouri; Matt Germonrez, Professor, College of Information Science & Technology at University of Nebraska at Omaha; Georg J.P. Link, Open Source Strategist; Jon Lloyd, Director of Campaigns at Mozilla Foundation; and Don Marti, for their endorsement of the DPG Standard as well as to the participants of the Early Grade Reading Community of Practice, UNICEF, Norway, iSPIRT, Sierra Leone and the DPG Alliance Secretariat for their contributions to this work.

Digital Public Goods Standard 1.0

Below is the full list of 9 indicators and requirements. These must be met in order for a nominated “project” (software, data, AI model, standard and/or piece of content) to be considered a digital public good. View it as a table here.

1. Relevance to Sustainable Development Goals

All projects must indicate the SDG(s) that they are relevant to and provide supporting links/documentation to support this relevance.

2. Use of approved open source license

Projects must demonstrate the use of an approved open source license. For Open Source Software, we only accept OSI approved licenses.

For Open Content we require the use of a Creative Commons license. While we encourage projects to use a license which allows for both derivatives and commercial reuse or dedicate content to the public domain (CC0) we also accept the following licenses which do not allow for commercial reuse: CC-BY-NC and CC-BY-NC-SA.

For data we require a Open Data Commons approved license listed at opendefinition.org/licenses.

3. Documentation of ownership

Ownership of everything that the project produces must be clearly defined and documented i.e. through copyright, trademark or other publicly available information.

4. Mandatory dependencies

If the open source project has mandatory dependencies that create more restrictions than the original license the projects must be able to demonstrate independence from the closed component and/or indicate the existence of functional, open alternatives.

5. Documentation

The project must have some documentation of the source code, use cases, and/or functional requirements.

For content, this should indicate any relevant compatible apps, software, hardware required to access the content and instructions about how to use it.

For software projects, this should be present as technical documentation that would allow a technical person unfamiliar with the project to launch and run the software.

For data projects, this should be present as documentation that describes all the fields in the set, and provides context on how the data was collected and how it should be interpreted.

6. Mechanism for Extracting Data

If this project has non personally identifiable information there must be a mechanism for extracting or importing non personally identifiable information data from the system in a non-proprietary format.

Note that evidence for requirements 7–9 can only be given by someone authorized to speak on behalf of the project. We collect title, name and contact information to confirm this authority.

7. Adherence to privacy and applicable laws

The project must state that it complies with relevant privacy laws, and all applicable international and domestic laws.

8. Adherence to standards & best practices

Projects must demonstrate some adherence to standards, best practices and/or principles. i.e. the principles for digital development

9. Do No Harm

All projects must demonstrate that they have taken steps to ensure that the project anticipates, prevents and does no harm.

9a) Privacy & Freedom of Expression

All projects must have strategies in place to anticipate, respond to and minimize adverse impacts on privacy and freedom of expression where governments are believed to be using the project’s product or services for illegitimate or political purposes.

9b) Data Privacy & Security

Projects that collect data must identify the types of data collected and stored and demonstrate that the project ensures the privacy and security of this data and has taken steps to prevent adverse impacts resulting from it’s collection, storage and distribution.

9c) Inappropriate & Illegal Content

Projects that collect, store or distribute content must have policies identifying inappropriate and illegal content such as child sexual abuse materials and mechanisms for detecting and moderating inappropriate/illegal content.

9d) Protection from harassment

If the project facilitates interactions with or between users or contributors there must be a mechanism for users and contributors to protect themselves against grief, abuse, and harassment. The project must have a mechanism to address the safety and security of underage users.

Originally published at https://digitalpublicgoods.net on September 15, 2020.

--

--

Lucy Harris

Open Innovation & Community — Digital Public Goods Alliance @UNICEFInnovate. Formerly — Open Innovation @Mozilla