What the Subtext of the Presidential Debates Tells Us About US Politics

Simon Greenwood
Oct 2, 2020 · 4 min read
The presidential debate of 9/29/2020

The first presidential debate of 2020 was nearly-universally regarded as awful. It was a toddler slap-fight played by grown men with an absent referee. Fortunately, that doesn’t matter.

What matters is what happened between the lines. Biden and Trump signaled their priorities with their focus. They also showed what positions are unpopular by using them as accusations.

Here’s a blow by blow of the topics and the hidden meanings of the candidates’ answers:


Biden spent most of his time on the threat to Obamacare posed by ACB and added an aside about women’s rights — an implicit reference to abortion, and the possibility that the new Justice could vote to overturn pro-choice rulings.

The two went on to bicker more over Obamacare, over who’d have handled COVID-19 better, and a bit more about abortion rights. Ultimately, they spent very little time on whether it was fair to seat a Justice so close to the election when the GOP refused to do so four years ago. They didn’t treat it as an issue that matters to voters.


The economy

Biden started with the normal attack from the left: that the economy favors the rich over the poor and that Trump has made it worse. He quickly pivoted to arguing that containing COVID is necessary to save lives.

For both candidates, addressing COVID was a higher priority than normal economic issues. The moderator had to push them to debate their economic plans. Trump said Biden wanted to raise taxes, Biden defended his plan as good for the economy. It was a typical left-versus-right debate.

They each took a moment to attack each other over scandals: Trump’s tax avoidance, and Biden’s son’s deals in Ukraine. They treated these scandals as low-priority. In particular, Trump’s taxes had been seen as a bombshell before the debate but Biden didn’t give them much time.


Trump brought up Biden’s past racially-charged “super predator” remarks then went hard on law-and-order. He touted his support among law enforcement officers and criticized the riots that followed the BLM protests. He hammered this point; the Trump campaign clearly believes that the American people hate this rioting and are ready to blame the Democrats.

Trump and Biden then argued over whether racial sensitivity training is useful or leftist propaganda. Their hearts weren’t in it, though, and they returned to the riots.

Trump’s record

Biden focused on the economy, Trump’s softness towards Putin, and his disrespectful remarks towards the military. Biden was appealing to the hawks in the audience. The two candidates then had an ugly fight over Biden’s sons that served no public interest.

The environment


Biden made a fairly anodyne statement encouraging everyone to vote. That’s a standard tactic for Democrats: self-identified Dems are slightly less likely to vote than Republicans. Trump expressed skepticism about mail-in voting, claiming fraud, and encouraged people to vote in person.


Dialogue & Discourse

News and ideas worthy of discourse.

Medium is an open platform where 170 million readers come to find insightful and dynamic thinking. Here, expert and undiscovered voices alike dive into the heart of any topic and bring new ideas to the surface. Learn more

Follow the writers, publications, and topics that matter to you, and you’ll see them on your homepage and in your inbox. Explore

If you have a story to tell, knowledge to share, or a perspective to offer — welcome home. It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. Write on Medium

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store