How to think well in the Information Age
19 mental heuristics
I’ve noticed that a certain style of thinking is very important for product strategy and concept innovation in digital media. This way of thinking has been called, broadly speaking, “Perspectivism.” I associate it with the best thinking in any discipline, but particularly philosophy, physics, machine learning, statistics, macro economics, ecology, management and organization sciences, and General Systems Theory.
And if I were to throw caution to the wind, and try to articulate its chief characteristics, I would make a stab with the following set of points:
- Taking the Observer, his situation and purpose, into account, as opposed to assuming that the observer plays no role in the construction of our world.
- Seeing things as matters of perspective, rather than absolute truth or reality
- Reasoning in a relativistic, contingent, provisional, and probabilistic way
- Keen awareness of the inter-dependence of things, rather than their dependence or independence
- Facility in (dis)solving problems or goals by reframing them
- Avoiding reification: seeing processes as processes, and relations as relations — rather than as things
- Focusing on differentiation, rather than definition
- Construing things as “open” (or “living”) systems, not static or mechanical “closed” systems
- A preference for dialectic, synthesis, and dialogue, as opposed to argument and proof
- Facility in “fuzzy” set theory and logic, as opposed to more limited, classical, Aristotelian methods of reasoning
- Organizing things as holonarchies (nested series of part-whole relations) as opposed to hierarchically
- A concern for and sensitivity to differences of logical class, type, and category, as opposed to everything as a matter of re-arrangement of physically primitive elements (behaviorism, reductionism, physicalism)
- Influencing indirectly through feedback loops rather than controlling directly through goals
- Understanding the interaction between things as hermeneutic: as acts of informing and being informed as opposed to physical movements of energy or objects.
- Facility with optimizing sets of inter-dependent variables, as opposed to holding all constant but one and maximizing it
- An emphasis on criteria, fit, appropriateness, consonance and coherence, as opposed to Truth or Right
- Sensitivity to the transmission of emotion, particularly as stimulating the oxytocin, dopamine, and testosterone physiological circuits, is the foundation of human communication, group formation, and sociality, as opposed to a byproduct or special topic of discourse
- Translation of information architecture and usability into ideas about choice architecture and automatic thinking (behavioral economic concepts) vs mechanical structure and time-and-motion steps
- Construing the environment and what’s in it creatively: within the constraint of what’s possible, meaningful, coherent, and successful; drawing the boundaries between systems and environment to fit your purpose appropriately, as opposed to construing the world “as is.”