Supporting Teachers with AI

Omar Al-Farooq, writing in the TES, questioned whether artificial intelligence should be welcomed in schools. Here, Professor Rose Luckin and Dr Carmel Kent argue that it should, but teachers have a vital role to play in its effective use.

Omar Al-Farooq made an important contribution to the discussion around the merits, and otherwise, of using artificial intelligence (AI) in schools.

His article presented a welcome challenge for EdTech companies and the industry as a while to acknowledge that teachers are ready to critically evaluate the advantages and challenges of this piece in the jigsaw of technology use in schools.

“One thing cannot be disputed. AI is here, and it is here to stay. Children use it daily, to chat with their friends, to generate music. It influences their choices as consumers.”

It is a conversation that could not have happened ten or even five years ago. The potential was still being developed, and it most people’s minds it was something ‘of the future’. Few people were seriously considering about the applications of AI in teaching and learning — and, in truth, many still aren’t. The principles around AI can be daunting and sometime frightening. But it need not be.

One thing cannot be disputed. AI is here, and it is here to stay. Children use it daily, to chat with their friends, to generate music. It influences their choices as consumers. Regardless of whether it appears in the classroom, it is a part of their lives.

AI in education is quite a complex creature. It does not work alone but involves human experts throughout all its life cycles: in its design, in decisions about data collection and anonymisation, in the choice of the modelling techniques, in the computation of meaningful features, and the evaluation of insights. Teachers are among that list of experts.

AI won’t make decisions for the teacher, but it can support humans to make informed choices about other humans — the learners.

Teachers need to learn how to ask questions about the quantity and quality of the data used to train the AI algorithms, about the transparency and explainability of the statistical models used by the AI and about possible biases and limitations of the predictions or recommendations made by it.

Of course, AI can be misused. All technology can. But ‘AI done right’ should be designed to safeguard its users. This means that the cohorts of trained data should be well-communicated (if cannot be also shared) with its users, and be laid out in its specific context, with possible biases and limitations highlighted, and adhering to standards similar to an academic peer review process.

GDPR guidelines must be followed, detailing the data storage and usage procedures, and commonly used model’s evaluation criteria (such as accuracy, recall and recognition) should be clearly reported and made available to the schools and parents.

Educators, researchers and innovators bear the heavy weight of responsibility to oversee a process that keeps children as safe as possible, while ensuring they are best equipped to function as 21st century citizens.

“AI won’t make decisions for the teacher, but it can support humans to make informed choices about other humans — the learners.”

It is the responsibility of Edtech companies’, policy makers, teachers and parents to make sure that learners are equipped with the tools to evaluate evidence provided to them, so they fully understand and able to make informed decisions of how to consume and provide data.

This is what we do on the EDUCATE programme. EdTech Innovators work with researchers and educators to ensure that the technology produced is purposeful, robust, valid and safe. We need educators and AI developers to work together to develop the best AI systems for use in education. The AI developers can learn from the educators about teaching and learning and the educators can learn from the developers about AI.

Omar’s article was so important because, as a teacher, he is among the educators spearheading the discussion and debate already taking place within the industry, and which now need to happen in schools.

We know that teachers are ready to critically evaluate the many uses and applications of AI and we encourage and welcome them to this process. It is vital that they contribute to the discussion.

Authors: Rose Luckin, Director, EDUCATE & Professor of Learner Centred Design, Institute of Education, UCL, and Dr Carmel Kent, EDUCATE Head of Data Science and Senior Research Fellow at UCL Institute of Education

Originally published May 2019 in TES