Think digital with this open-source canvas

Chris Gasser
ELCA IT
Published in
10 min readApr 26, 2022

Thinking digital is an imperative for all but a few organizations. The open-source ICT Advisory Canvas will help you develop a plan to enhance the IT function, align it with the needs of the whole organization, and manage new challenges in a holistic way.

“41% of executives acknowledge that their organizations will be forced to reinvent themselves every 1–3 years due to competitive pressures, and 23% are prepared to do it every year”
— IMD, Digital Vortex 2019

Digital transformation is just one of many disruptions

In the last four years 90% of enterprises faced a disruptive turn [1], and studies suggest up to 55% of leading firms will drop from their industry top 10 due to digital disruption [2].

Apart from world-shaking upheavals such as the Covid pandemic, common disruptions affecting CIOs include organizational transformation, severe pressure on operating costs, shifting customer expectations, new, game-changing technologies, regulatory intervention, competition from new entrants, and many other changes in the business environment.

IT has become part of the backbone of the enterprise, and the complexity of the IT landscape has increased dramatically in almost all dimensions: technologies, vendors, regulations, processes, use cases … so developing a digital strategy that covers the entire enterprise has become a major challenge. What follows will help you meet and master the challenge.

The team of business technology advisors I work with created the ICT Advisory Canvas to support clear and pragmatic guidance in a turbulent world. Drawing on 50 years of experience in IT and over 1,000 projects, our team has designed a simple, elegant tool to analyze the Business-IT ecosystem using just a few building blocks.

This straightforward model helps organizations quickly gain insights into where their IT is today, where it needs to go, and how to get there. But it’s much more. It’s a powerful tool to align Business and IT in enterprise-wide initiatives such as Digital Transformation and Lean-Agile Adoption.

This article gives you an overview of the Canvas, and enough explanation so you can start using it for yourself quickly.

“The world is now changing at a rate at which the basic systems, structures, and cultures built over the past century cannot keep up with the demands being placed on them”
— John P. Kotter, Accelerate: Building Strategic Agility for a Faster-Moving World

Understanding the ICT Advisory Canvas

At its core, the ICT Advisory Canvas is simply an ontology; that is, a way of showing the properties of a subject area (here, IT and the Enterprise) and how these properties are related. We use the following visual to represent the core Canvas (a drabber but more practical working template is provided at the end of the article) :

Fig.1 — The core model of the ICT Advisory Canvas

Since we are looking at the relationships between the IT function and the rest of the company (or organization), “IT” and “Business” quite logically form the background of the canvas.

This background is overlaid with a set of six blocks that represent a model for the enterprise:

  • The products and services that the company provides.
  • The capabilities and the organizational structures needed to provide these products and services.
  • The processes underlying the capabilities, along with the policies that frame them.
  • The people performing the actual work, their skills and competencies, as well as the culture and ethics that guide them.
  • The data created or used by the people and processes as they carry out their work, together with the applications that process the data, automate the processes, or otherwise support the capabilities.
  • The infrastructure and physical resources that power the company.

Each of these blocks spans the IT and the Business sides of the organization, and acts as a bridge between them. Individually, each block represents a specific domain for Business-IT alignment. Together, they form a structure that makes sure we are examining all the relevant aspects of how IT interacts with the whole organization.

At the top of the Canvas is the enterprise’s digital strategy, which sets the vision and the key directions for the organization. In some cases, this digital strategy is split into two distinct parts: the business strategy, and the IT strategy that derives from it.

Finally, in our world of relentless change, all organizations must adapt and evolve continuously. This change is dictated by the enterprise strategy, and achieved by a portfolio of initiatives, programs and projects that make up the last component of the Canvas. Some of these projects are initiated and led by the business, others are IT-led; but the common imperative for digitalization means that most key projects involve Business and IT aspects, and it’s essential they’re harmonized.

Systems Thinking and the six alignment domains

Enterprises are complex systems, and the ICT Advisory Canvas relies on the Systems Thinking body of knowledge to analyze the organization or the company as a whole. According to Wikipedia [4], “a system is a cohesive conglomeration of interrelated and interdependent parts which can be natural or human-made; every system is bounded by space and time, influenced by its environment, defined by its structure and purpose, and expressed through its functioning”. As such, a system exhibits some interesting properties that are relevant to the Canvas [4][5]:

  • A system is more than the sum of its parts (provided that it expresses synergies or emergent behavior).
  • For a system to behave well, a high-level understanding of its structure and behavior is needed.
  • The value of a system flows through the interconnections of its components.
  • A system can evolve no faster than its slowest interconnection point.
  • Optimizing just one component does not optimize the system — you have to optimize the whole.

Using the Canvas you can explore the connections between the components of the enterprise as a system, and understand how a change in one of the component triggers changes in the other components. For example, let’s imagine the business strategy mandates the creation of a new product line; this will cause a cascade of consequences: new capabilities will need to be created to enable the product line, new processes will emerge to support the new capabilities, new staff or new skills will operate these processes, new applications and infrastructure will support them, etc.

Looking more closely at the Canvas’ components from a Systems Thinking perspective, you’ll understand why they were chosen, and their roles.

Products and services

Every enterprise, including non-profit organizations, exist for a reason: to provide some kind of goods and/or services. It’s therefore important to start by understanding what the outputs of the organization are to know which products and services from the IT function will best support the business. Tools such as Value Network Analysis can help with insights into how value is created and circulates inside the enterprise, as well as through its external network of customers and suppliers.

Capabilities and organizational structures

In order to be able to deliver goods and services, an enterprise needs to have a broad set of capabilities across its whole value chain. For example, a power utility would need core business capabilities such as power generation, energy management, systems supervision, energy trading, and many more. And every enterprise has supporting capabilities such as financial management, HR management, or risk and compliance management.

Often (but not always) these capabilities are reflected in the organizational structures of the enterprise, which is why we need to look at these two aspects together.

By engaging with the stakeholders, and the leaders of the capabilities and organizational units, we can understand their priorities, challenges, and the outcomes they pursue. In turn, we use this knowledge to design the IT capabilities needed to address the business units’ pain points and targets.

Processes and policies

While the capabilities express what the enterprise does, the processes communicate how it does it. So, looking at these processes brings us one step further in our understanding of the dynamics of the organization. This complements the perspective on the static architecture conveyed by the enterprise’s organizational structure.

In most cases, processes are often the result (or at least the reflection) of the policies in place in the enterprise, which is why it’s useful to consider both dimensions at the same time.

Note that, in the context of the Canvas, the notion of “process” must be interpreted loosely. A process can be manual or automated; it can be formal, semi-formal, or ad hoc. We don’t even have to aim to be exhaustive when analyzing the processes (unless that is the point of our mission): processes are a good way to probe for the interactions between the components of the organization, and how information, assets and, ultimately, value flows through them.

People and culture

In Lean Management, respect for people and culture is one the pillars of the “House of Lean” [6]. It is therefore no surprise this component plays an important role in the ICT Advisory Canvas.

Some important things we evaluate when exploring this domain include: does the IT function have enough capacity to effectively support the business? Do the people have the right skills and competencies? How are skill gaps (both current and projected) identified and corrected? What resources are allocated for people development? What leadership structures and practices are in place?

The way people behave in the organization is strongly influenced by its culture, values and ethics. Any action resulting from an ICT Advisory engagement must either fit the existing culture, or contribute to changing it in a clear, planned direction.

Applications and Data

The Applications and Data domain is not going to be “pure IT stuff” because we’re striving to align IT and Business by analyzing the domain from both perspectives.

For example, the quality and fitness-for-purpose of enterprise data is primarily a Business concern. But it is also an IT concern, because the means of improving these things are shared: the tools and technology for ensuring data quality, and timeliness may be provided by the IT function, but the knowledge of what is “good” data can only come from the Business.

When we evaluate an enterprise’s data assets and application portfolio, we consider how well these fit business needs, and how sound they are from a technology perspective. In parallel, we look for gaps: new data or application assets that will be needed to enable the business outcomes the enterprise is pursuing.

The results of the data and application portfolio analysis usually feed directly into the organization’s IT strategy, with each gap or “unfit” asset potentially generating the need for action. For example, application improvement or replacement, the deployment of a data management tool, or the introduction of better technical governance practices.

Infrastructure and Resources

On the IT side, the infrastructure and resources domain comprises laptops, workstations, servers, data storage units, network and other devices, and, in some cases, even data centers and the equipment needed to power and cool them.

On the business side, things can be a lot more varied, since any and all of the physical assets of the enterprise can be considered: facilities, manufacturing equipment, logistics network, distribution outlets, and even the raw materials consumed by the production chain. It‘s interesting to note that, until recently, in practice we rarely had to go beyond a cursory overview of all these elements. But trends like IoT and edge computing are changing all that, and this last layer of our model is becoming ever more important.

Using the Canvas

The name “ICT Advisory Canvas” was not chosen at random. Inspired by the Business Model Canvas pioneered by Osterwalder and Pigneur [3] it’s meant to be used in much the same way: as a visual tool to guide any kind of thought process about IT in the context of the enterprise.

In our work, we use the Canvas in many different ways. For example:

  • On its own, as a high-level template for conducting 360° assessments of the IT function, analyzing the baseline situation of a client organization, or for designing the desired target state in an IT strategy.
  • As a complement to other consulting tools. For instance, if we are doing a SWOT analysis, we can use the Canvas to classify our findings in a systematic way.
  • In combination with other, finer-grained models that support deeper analysis. Some example uses: applying COBIT to drill down into IT processes; using DMBOK for a close look at the Data domain; or using the TIME model to assess the application landscape.

Customizing the Canvas

Like all good models, the advisory Canvas lends itself to modifications, extensions, or remixes. It is meant to be tailored to each situation.

The following diagram gives an example of customization by extension. In this instance, the enterprise is placed in the broader context of its business, in order to explore the connections with customers, competitors, partners, and so on:

Fig.2 — Adding an ecosystem to the core Canvas

Many other customizations are possible, which we will explore in another publication.

Conclusion — and historical perspective

In 2003 Nicholas Carr, an influential writer, wrote an article [7] in the Harvard Business Review that sparked a heated debate in the IT industry, and caused countless bad decisions at many companies. This article was titled “IT Doesn’t Matter”; in it, Carr argued IT had become commoditized and had therefore lost its strategic importance in business. Nowadays, anyone can see how wrong this assertion was: in our world of digital transformation, IT is literally the engine that powers the world’s most successful companies.

Carr’s reasoning was logically sound but, unfortunately, it was based on a narrow economic view. He equated IT with “servers and network”, completely missing the point of information technology, which is to create new digital products and services that deliver tangible value. Fundamentally, Carr’s mistake was to reduce a complex problem to a single dimension, when he should have taken a systemic and holistic view instead.

Taking a systemic and holistic view is precisely what we do when we advise our clients: we analyze not only the IT function but look at the whole organization and its environment. And the ICT Advisory Canvas is a very valuable instrument to make sure we keep our minds as open and clear as possible.

References

[1] Gartner (2019). “2020 CIO Agenda: Winning in the Turns”.

[2] IMD (2019). “Digital Vortex 2019 — Continuous and Connected Change”.

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Model_Canvas

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_theory

[5] https://www.scaledagileframework.com/apply-systems-thinking/

[6] https://www.scaledagileframework.com/lean-agile-mindset/

[7] Carr, N. (2003). “IT Doesn’t Matter”, Harvard Business Review.

ICT Advisory Canvas working template

The ICT Advisory Canvas working template, is released under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/), which means that anyone can use it and modify it for their own work; the requirement is full, clear identification and credit of the source of the Canvas: “ELCA Informatique S.A. — www.elca.ch".

(right-click and download the high-resolution image)

--

--

Chris Gasser
ELCA IT
Writer for

I’m an IT consultant with a background in software engineering. When I’m not tinkering with computers, I like to read, hike, sail and build wooden boats.