Member-only story

Are you more likely to buy a property if you can first take a virtual tour of it?

Enrique Dans
Enrique Dans
Published in
2 min readAug 15, 2024

A study just published in one of the best information systems journals, Information Systems Research entitled “Does virtual reality help property sales? Empirical evidence from a real estate platform”, examines the influence of virtual tours of properties offered on online real estate platforms, concluding that they do not make any real contribution getting a higher price, but they do influence the time those properties remain on the market.

The study, carried out using data from Beike, a Chinese online real estate platform similar to Zillow, Matterport, ImmobilienScout24 or Idealista, explores the role of the most basic and non-immersive virtual reality technology: combinations of video and photographs in 360º format that allow the potential buyer to explore a property using a mouse.

This type of tool, generally offered by the platforms themselves, is a way to make a property stand out, offering the potential buyer a more interactive experience, as opposed to a collection of photos. Overall, the availability of these types of virtual tours reduced time to market by between 28% and 49%, or 19 to 34 days quicker.

Although no direct influence of virtual tours on the price of properties has been found, there is a certain indirect effect: in many cases, would-be buyers tend to reduce their offers the longer the property is on the market.

An interesting example of how technology can impact a sector, in this case real estate, potentially influencing the final sale price of a property.

(En español, aquí)

--

--

Enrique Dans
Enrique Dans

Published in Enrique Dans

On the effects of technology and innovation on people, companies and society (writing in Spanish at enriquedans.com since 2003)

Enrique Dans
Enrique Dans

Written by Enrique Dans

Professor of Innovation at IE Business School and blogger (in English here and in Spanish at enriquedans.com)

Responses (3)