How many times will AI prove that our copyright laws are no longer fit for purpose?

Enrique Dans
Enrique Dans
Published in
3 min readSep 12, 2023

--

IMAGE: Two boards of images created by robotic hands and holding a large copyright sign with a question mark in its center
IMAGE: Gerd Altmann — Pixabay

Once again, the U.S. Copyright Office has refused to register an image because it was originally generated by an algorithm, despite the fact that its author, throughout a creative process starting with Midjourney, had subjected it to numerous revisions and had edited it significantly using Photoshop.

The image is the well-known “Theatre D’opera Spatial,” which won its author, Jason M. Allen, a local art contest in October 2022. Previously, the US Copyright Office had also refused to register the images of a graphic novel, “Zarya of the Dawn”, written by Kris Kashtanova and also illustrated using Midjourney (in this case it accepted the registration of the texts, written by the author); and artwork created by a developer, Stephen Thaler, using DABUS, an algorithm also created by himself.

What does all this mean? I believe that it’s proof that copyright law as we understand it, based on the Statute of Anne dating back 313 years ago, is no longer valid. Firstly, because the system systematically results in the…

--

--

Enrique Dans
Enrique Dans

Professor of Innovation at IE Business School and blogger (in English here and in Spanish at enriquedans.com)