Everyday Democracy: non-hierarchical organising in South Korea

I hosted a kind of Open Enspiral workshop in December 2016 that felt really effective so I wanted to share the format. It was called Everyday Democracy, situated at the end of a conference about young people in East Asian politics, the day after the Korean president had been impeached after massive civil unrest.

My opening provocation was like: sure we’ve fired the president, now let’s fire the boss. I positioned Enspiral as a group of people who want to practice democracy every day, not just on election day.

I had planned to run a few immersive democratic experiences, but in discussion with my cohosts, decided that the original design might push people too far out of their comfort zone. So we co-designed a format that felt beautifully well suited to the people in the room.

I’d guess we spent more than 15 person-hours in prep time, which really paid off.

I had an interpreter with me so Korean to English translation was simultaneous. Anything I said in English was consecutively translated into Korean so we had to factor that into timing. Presenting in short stop-start bursts is good for clarity, though it made it harder to keep the energy up.

Here’s the runsheet:

Check in (30min)

Everyone standing in a circle: share your name, how you’re feeling on scale of 1 to 5, with a brief explanation of why. 1–5 scale makes it easy to participate. Standing check-in makes it short and gets the energy up.

Intro (10min)

Explain agenda in context of conference, introduce me and my cohost Sunkyung from C. (So good to have a second facilitator so we can take turns hosting and resting, plus a couple of extra helpers for logistics.)

Enspiral (20min: 10min in English + 10min in Korean)

Everyone sitting in a big circle while I explain Enspiral with 3 slides:

  1. Members/Contributors/Ventures
  2. Cobudget
  3. Loomio

Not trying to give enough detail for people to copy Enspiral, just to give an example of a radically democratic organising system to help people imagine the direction they could take their projects/organisations.

10 minute Q&A for clarification.

Small group discussion (40min)

Split into groups of 8 (number off around the circle). Rearrange the room to have each group sitting around small tables with post-its and pens on hand. 40 minute discussion, noting down key points on post-its:

  1. Introduce youself: why you came today?
  2. Utopia: 1 or 2 people share a story of a really excellent collaborative experience.
  3. Reality: discuss why these experiences are not common in our daily working life.

Feedback + sharing (20min)

Stick post-its on the wall under headings Utopia and Reality. Roam around and see everyone else’s responses. Couple of people share striking stories/moments. Themes:

  • Utopia: Listening, cooperation of individuals, self understanding, trust, harmony, 1-to-1 emotional sharing, tolerance, celebrated failure, abundance, transparency, psychological safety…
  • Reality: no safety, revenge, punishment, rigid structure, age, gender, rank, endless discussion, top down, minds over hearts, fear, ignorance, efficiency obsession, selfish, unilateral decisions…

I noticed reading & writing allowed for much greater sharing than if we had just asked for volunteers to share verbally.

I summarised: post-its show huge alignment; we have a shared intention for how we want to work, and we all know the obstacles to this. Now let’s treat the two categories as a design brief, how to make your Reality a little bit more like your Utopia?

Six Circles (20min)

As there are common goals and challenges, I suggested there are also common design patterns that help groups to function more like the Utopia scenario.

I shared my 6 circles as suggestions of interventions that participants might try in their projects or organisations. These are 6 patterns of organising that bridge between Reality and Utopia.

This needs a post of its own… coming soon. In the meantime, here’s a 20min talk I did elsewhere on the 6 circles idea.

Check out (30min)

I think these kinds of events are 10x more impactful with a good check-out circle, where you can appreciate the depth and breadth of the different experiences of all the participants.

We checked out, with the prompt: after all this great conversation, what’s one action you’re going to take on Monday?

We heard lots of “I’m going to introduce one of the 6 circles into my project” or “I’m going to have a conversation about hierarchy with my workmates” or my favourite: “I’m going to check with my wife to see if I need to be more democratic at home.” — perfect! 😂

After officially closed the workshop, about 15 people stuck around for an unscheduled bonus meeting to plan their next steps together. They’ve formed a kind of “nonhierarchical organising” study group who’ve been meeting regularly since December. I’m heading back in mid-March to see if I can support this burgeoning movement for everyday democracy.

Stay tuned!

If you want an Enspiral person to come host a workshop like this in your town, send me a message. 😍

Richard D. Bartlett

Written by

I write about working together (http://richdecibels.com). Loomio cofounder (http://loomio.org). Enspiral member (http://enspiral.com).

Enspiral Tales

Stories from a bold experiment - creating a collaborative network that helps people do meaningful work.

Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade