Ethereum with DVT offers a more resilient alternative
Introduction
Innovation, adaptation, and many crises have shaped the financial system from the earliest forms of primitive exchange to currency creation.
The 2008 financial crisis (Lehman Brothers) and the more recent one in March 2023 (Silicon Valley Bank) have exposed that despite the sophistication of the traditional financial system, , its architectural flaws stem from a lack of transparency and the centralization of power under these systems.
However, these crises have also paved the way for new ideas to create more resilient systems less prone to failures by a few powerful institutions. Blockchain has emerged as a crucial component in this response to the limitations of traditional financial systems, born out of the 2008 crisis with the introduction of Bitcoin.
Yet, Ethereum and its programmable contracts have ushered in a new era of user-empowered finance, enabling the deployment of protocols in this ecosystem known as decentralized finance (DeFi).
However, recent actions against developers and Pavel Durov (CEO of Telegram) remind us that the path to innovative alternatives is a tortuous road filled with challenges beyond technology.
This reasoning is why using a global network of nodes and validators to automatically execute transactions and contracts without intermediaries or single points of failure is crucial to ensuring communication in a completely decentralized, censorship-free, and secure environment, especially when money is at stake.
Innovations like Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) in Ethereum are now considered a fast track to achieving this global, distributed, and resilient network in a more decentralized Ethereum.
This article reflects on how the evolution of financial systems has led to the need for innovation in new protocols based on DVT as more resilient and secure alternatives to traditional monetary power.
The Evolution of Financial Systems
As societies and individuals, we have always needed to establish trade in goods and services for our evolutionary survival. Money as a medium of exchange has evolved from bartering in ancient times to using precious metals as exchange media in Mesopotamia around 1500 BC.
However, it wasn’t until the minting of coins between the 6th and 7th centuries BC that money became clearly identifiable as a general form of payment, establishing the origin of a monetary system that today has its foundations in the traditional financial system.
Nevertheless, the network of financial institutions we know today, the basis of the international monetary system, was built on centralizing power in a few institutions, such as central banks and large financial entities..
These central banks and financial organizations, consequences of the emergence of the first banknotes in the 11th century in Mongolia and later popularized in Europe in 1661 in Sweden, are currently responsible for the centralized and regulated approach of the traditional monetary system.
Practices like the indiscriminate printing of fiat money by central banks became a headache in the post-war era since the mid-20th century when the monetary system had a US dollar backed by gold.
While the ‘modern’ international monetary system has evolved from a fixed exchange rate approach (Bretton Woods) to a more flexible and dynamic system, adapting to global economic changes and financial challenges, recent crises show that the system is still amiss.
Centralized and opaque institutions, stringent regulations since the 2008 financial crisis, and inefficient advances demonstrated by the events of March 2023 indicate that the era of central banks being responsible for economic crises may be coming to an end, at least in the original conception we know today; this is why the simple and powerful idea of a decentralized peer-to-peer system proposed by Nakamoto with Bitcoin, as the premise of a censorship-resistant and cryptographically proven payment system, has had the impact we see today on the conception of ‘how modern money should be.’
Bitcoin allowed us to envision a more decentralized future based on blockchain technology, where Ethereum has laid the foundation for a resilient financial system that evolves as challenges arise.
Currently, the regulatory crackdown on Ethereum through the trivialization of staking programs, lawsuits against Consensys alleging improper sale of securities, or the lack of clarity on formal positions regarding the classification of ETH and the Ethereum network as securities or commodities only serve to strengthen innovation in the sector, driving a genuinely decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem.
DeFi has proven over the past decade to be a viable concept for millions of users, achieving rapid growth that now captures the institutional interest of major traditional financial institutions, which were once its biggest detractors.
Ethereum’s Contribution to Decentralized Finance
It is essential to remember that smart contract programmability was unavailable when Bitcoin emerged in 2008. It was the most primitive form of digital money, demonstrating potential use cases thanks to the innovative concept of proof-of-work (PoW) as a verification mechanism to prevent double-spending.
No one doubts that thanks to Ethereum and its vision of smart contract platforms, digital money has evolved into more complex use cases that mimic everyday scenarios in traditional finance, such as lending, borrowing, mortgages, etc.
When we look at Ethereum’s evolution over the seven years the network has existed, it is astonishing to see the prominence of its role in the industry, particularly in the financial sector.
DeFi represents a market with $87.048 billion in Total Value Locked and
Ethereum dominates the scene, with over 56.83% distributed across more than 1150 protocols, including various utilities such as lending, staking, TradFi, and DEXs.
We now have complex staking systems that demand a more scalable and resilient platform, but also one that is more decentralized to combat the internal challenges posed by its growth in adoption, such as the centralization of validators, sequencers, and even node operators that could pose a risk to the network’s security.
From MEV attacks to on-chain content censorship, these are part of the network challenges while shaping its rollup-centric roadmap towards a fully decentralized and scalable network.
Fortunately, the security issues caused by its centralization in block validation have an imminent solution through Distributed Validator Technology (DVT), which could complement Ethereum’s efforts to become a resilient and decentralized financial alternative to the traditional financial system.
Distributed Validator Technology (DVT)
Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) has been proposed to address the centralization issue in Ethereum, a solution currently under development in a few industry protocols like SafeStake, which even serves as the foundation for major staking pool protocols like Lido.
DVT leverages threshold signature cryptography to introduce an additional layer of decentralization through a network of permissionless node operators, allowing an Ethereum validator, which typically runs on a single node, to operate on a committee of operators composed of multiple nodes.
Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) allows entities and individuals to run an Ethereum Validator simultaneously on more than one node or machine. This central feature of DVT provides greater node resilience, reducing the risk of slashing for honest validators and decentralizing the validator function.
From a staking service perspective, this new technology reduces infrastructure costs by running many validators while ensuring high levels of security and availability. An example is the execution of operator clusters based on the SafeStake protocol, which uses DVT to offer a more resilient staking service while simultaneously reducing infrastructure costs.
But DVT also benefits smaller validators and solo operators, offering a level of protection comparable to that of a large-scale staking provider. With these improvements, DVT encourages more people and institutions to participate in ETH staking, further securing and decentralizing the Ethereum network.
In essence, DVT adds an extra layer of fault tolerance, security, and decentralization, helping to minimize single points of failure and centralization issues in Ethereum.
Benefits of DVT
- Increased Decentralization: By splitting validation tasks among multiple nodes, DVT reduces centralization in the hands of a few powerful validators, which is crucial to maintaining Ethereum’s original vision of being a decentralized, censorship-resistant platform.
- Enhanced Resilience: the network becomes more resilient to failures and attacks with DVT. If one or more nodes fail or are compromised, the remaining nodes can continue operating, ensuring the network remains functional and secure.
- Robust Security: DVT strengthens Ethereum’s security by making it harder for attackers to compromise the network. A successful attack would require compromising multiple nodes simultaneously, which is significantly more complex and costly.
- Reduced Risk of Slashing: On the Ethereum network, validators are subject to penalties known as “slashing” if they behave dishonestly or inefficiently. With DVT, by distributing the workload, the risk of individual errors leading to penalties is reduced, improving stability for validators.
DVT Use Cases in Ethereum
Although Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) is relatively new, protocols like SSV Network, Obol Labs, Diva Labs, and SafeStake are already implementing it, the latter set to launch its mainnet in H2 2024, according to its official channels.
However, the real power of this technology lies beyond these staking protocols and resides precisely in its use in established industry projects through the framework of the mentioned protocols.
As mentioned earlier, Lido, a leading liquid staking project in the industry by the amount of ETH staked, is adapting DVT to enhance the security of its delegated funds and reduce its infrastructure costs. As noted earlier, Lido is currently running operator clusters based on SafeStake to use this technology to distribute multiple nodes.
Lido’s case is just one example of the collaborations between development teams in the Ethereum community working together to integrate DVT into the network, conducting crucial tests to refine the technology before its large-scale implementation to counter the adverse effects of centralization in the beacon chain and provide greater security to all stakeholders.
This technology could also be implemented in decentralized financial protocols, such as lending protocols, to improve user safety and decentralization through multi-party validation schemes. Similarly, DVT can be applied to Ethereum-based infrastructure projects, like wallets or identity management protocols, to boost security and decentralization.
The versatility of DVT is immense, and although its implementation on the mainnet is still in its early stages, we believe that it will become a key pillar in building a more resilient, decentralized, and secure Ethereum network.
Conclusion
Using decentralized technologies for an efficient alternative financial system involves exploring and supporting technologies that distribute the load of validators, eliminate single points of failure, and broaden the operational base of the nodes supporting the network.
DVT is a game changer, and the infrastructure of these protocols can serve stakers of all sizes, from institutional staking providers and retail players to home stakers running solo validators. We believe DVT will help circumvent regulatory challenges and mitigate censorship issues and threats to the network by preventing the centralization of validator power in the hands of a few large players.
Ethereum’s role in this revolution cannot be overstated, given that it has provided a platform for decentralized finance and opened the door to new ways of thinking about money, contracts, and the very structure of financial systems.
Perhaps Ethereum cannot supplant the traditional financial system, but using its technology, especially that based on DVT, can be a breakthrough — not only to improve the network itself and solve some of the challenges that come with its growth but also as an example of how useful it can be to apply its infrastructure to run more secure transactions and create a more resilient alternative financial system that is gaining more and more followers.
No doubt, running a traditional financial system can cost billions of dollars in infrastructure, maintenance, and innovation to make it efficient in terms of scalability, security, and transaction execution.
On the other hand, a single home staker can upgrade their machine to a distributed validator for a few hundred dollars and participate in a DVT-based network, becoming a trader by accepting delegation from third-party validators to earn commissions with the same hardware investment.
As DVT continues to develop and gain adoption, it has the potential to play a crucial role in the ongoing evolution of Ethereum and the broader decentralized finance ecosystem.
