Ripple vs. SEC: Who Truly Won?

Gary Ma
Exponential Era
Published in
5 min readAug 13, 2024

In the tumultuous arena of cryptocurrency, Ripple’s legal showdown with the SEC has become a defining saga. Accused in 2020 of orchestrating an unregistered securities offering — effectively an unauthorized IPO — Ripple’s battle has morphed into a barometer for the SEC’s aggressive campaign against the crypto industry, a campaign critics argue stretches beyond its legal mandate. This year, the case has only grown in significance, emerging as a bellwether for how courts may handle the SEC’s broader crackdown on the crypto industry. Here’s a brief look at how the case started, its current status, and its far-reaching implications for the crypto world.

Short History of the XRP Case

Ripple Labs, founded in 2012, set out to revolutionize cross-border payments with its cryptocurrency, XRP. By 2020, Ripple had made significant strides, using XRP to enable fast and inexpensive international transactions. However, in December 2020, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple, accusing the company of conducting an unregistered securities offering by selling XRP.

The SEC claimed Ripple raised over $1.3 billion without registering XRP as a security, violating federal laws. Ripple countered that they weren’t given fair notice that XRP could be considered a security and argued they were unfairly singled out, unlike Bitcoin and Ethereum.

The case saw key developments over the years. In December 2020, major exchanges like Coinbase suspended XRP trading. In 2021, a judge ruled that XRP’s utility as money distinguished it from other cryptocurrencies. The battle continued into 2023, with a mixed ruling that public XRP sales did not violate securities laws, though institutional sales did. The SEC’s request to appeal this decision was denied in August 2023.

XRP Price increase during the case (August 7) | Source: Coin Stats

Current State of the Case

As of 2024, the SEC vs. Ripple case remains one of the most pivotal legal battles in the cryptocurrency industry, with far-reaching implications. While there have been significant developments and partial resolutions, the case is not fully concluded.

On August 7, Ripple faced a $125 million fine from the SEC, settling a heated dispute over their direct sales of XRP to institutional investors — sales that the court had labelled as unregistered securities transactions. While Ripple successfully argued that public sales of XRP weren’t securities, the SEC held firm on the idea that their institutional sales crossed the line. The fine, though hefty, was a far cry from the potential $2 billion penalty, allowing Ripple to address the SEC’s concerns without admitting wrongdoing. This settlement marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing clash between crypto innovation and regulatory oversight, underscoring the delicate balance the industry must navigate.

Source: Eleanor Terrett on X

Impact On The Crypto Industry

The Ripple case is a double-edged sword for the crypto world. On one hand, Ripple’s founders claim a partial victory by avoiding the full extent of the SEC’s demands, but the case also exposes the SEC’s vulnerabilities and inconsistent regulatory approach. The SEC’s history of targeting perceived weaknesses in crypto and withholding information when convenient is evident not only in the Ripple case but also in its handling of Bitcoin ETF approvals, where prolonged delays and unclear guidance forced courts to demand clearer reasoning. Ripple’s partial win, especially the ruling that XRP’s public sales aren’t securities, feels like a broader victory for the crypto industry. It suggests that traditional securities laws might not always apply to digital assets and that we might need new regulations to keep up with innovation in this space.

The case also exposes the SEC’s aggressive stance and potential overreach, raising concerns tied to “Chokepoint 2.0.” This strategy is seen as a way for regulators to choke off the crypto industry by cutting off its access to essential financial services without outright bans. The SEC’s retroactive enforcement of regulations, without providing clear guidance beforehand, has drawn criticism from Ripple and the broader crypto community. With recent moves against crypto-friendly banks and policy shifts that seem designed to stifle crypto’s integration into traditional finance, it’s clear this pressure is mounting. However, the tide may be turning as the 2024 election approaches. Both presidential candidates, Trump and Harris, have shown increasing support for crypto, a shift from their parties’ previous stances. This change, along with Ripple’s win and Binance’s recent victory in their case against the SEC, raises the question: Is this newfound leniency simply election-driven, a temporary reprieve before the regulatory hammer falls again? Regardless, the need for transparent and fair regulations is more pressing than ever.

That said, Ripple is not without fault. While they successfully challenged some of the SEC’s claims, their strategy of advancing XRP into institutional markets without proper registration was risky and ultimately led to significant legal consequences. The $125 million fine serves as a reminder that innovation must operate within the bounds of the law, and Ripple now faces the challenge of navigating the post-lawsuit landscape with greater caution.

As the dust settles on the XRP case, both sides are claiming victory. Ripple is celebrating a fine smaller than expected, while the SEC touts the twelve-fold increase in penalties and the legal acknowledgement of Ripple’s securities violations. With both parties feeling they’ve outmaneuvered the other, an appeal is still on the table. Ripple has avoided a crippling financial blow, and the SEC has set a precedent for future cases. The real question now is whether the SEC will challenge the ruling to tighten its grip on the crypto industry or wait for the next major player to falter.

Exponential Era is your source for forward-thinking content about all things Web3 on Medium, powered by Epik. Epik is the the world’s leading IP licensing agency expert in Web3, AI, Metaverse, and the premier agency for brand integration in video games, leveraging the largest digital ecosystem and advanced cross-chain technology.

Follow our socials to stay up-to-date on the latest news and developments on partnerships and collaborations. Telegram, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and Official Website.

--

--

Gary Ma
Exponential Era

COO of @epikprime. Brands & Licensing 🦸‍♂️ || Gaming & NFTs 🎮 || Web3 & Metaverses 🌐 || Innovating with $EPIK