Navigating the M2 Money Supply Contraction and Yield Curve Inversion: Implications for Finance and Crypto

As the M2 Money Supply contracts at its fastest rate since the 1930s and the yield curve inverts, the global economy teeters on the precipice of significant change. Delve into our comprehensive analysis to understand the implications for both traditional finance and the crypto market, and explore the theories that are emerging in response to these complex phenomena.

TL;DR:

• M2 Money Supply is contracting rapidly, hinting at a potential economic slowdown.
• The yield curve has inverted, often seen as a recession predictor.
• Alternative theories suggest these events might be orchestrated for specific goals.
• These events will impact the crypto market, affecting asset attractiveness, volatility, and regulations.
• Other factors like geopolitical tensions and government policies also play a role in economic predictions.

Get first access to more of this content that exposes the invisible forces reshaping our global financial system directly in your inbox.

Subscribe to The Reset, a daily newsletter where Crypto meets Macro and Geopolitics.

The M2 Money Supply Meltdown

The M2 Money Supply, a broad measure of money’s role in the economy, is experiencing a significant contraction. The M2 Money Supply includes not only cash but also near-cash deposits like savings accounts and mutual funds. It’s a critical economic indicator, and its contraction is a sign of decreased liquidity and potential economic slowdown.

• This contraction is the fastest rate of decrease since the 1930s, a period marked by the Great Depression. The implications of this are far-reaching and could potentially cool inflation, but the situation is complex and multifaceted.
• The Federal Reserve has been reducing its balance sheet, contributing to the contraction. This reduction is part of a broader attempt to normalize monetary policy following the extraordinary measures taken during the COVID-19 pandemic.
• The contraction of the M2 Money Supply is not necessarily a harbinger of economic doom. It could potentially cool down inflation, which has been a significant concern in recent times. However, it’s also a sign of tightening financial conditions, which could slow economic growth.
• The situation is further complicated by geopolitical tensions, notably the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. These tensions have led to increased uncertainty in global financial markets, which could further impact the M2 Money Supply.

The Inverted Yield Curve and Its Implications

The yield curve, a graphical representation of the interest rates on debt for a range of maturities, has inverted. This inversion, where long-term debt instruments have a lower yield than short-term ones, is traditionally also seen as a predictor of economic recession.

• The yield curve inversion is a rare event and has preceded previous recessions, making it a significant concern for investors and economists. However, it’s not a guaranteed predictor, and other economic indicators do not necessarily indicate a recession.
• The inversion is partially due to the Federal Reserve’s actions. By raising short-term interest rates while long-term economic growth expectations remain subdued, the yield curve can invert.
• Other major economies, including Japan and the UK, have experienced similar inversions. This global trend could potentially indicate a broader economic slowdown.

The Alternative Theory Angle

In the intricate world of global finance, the Federal Reserve stands as a titan, its control over the money supply shaping the fortunes of the world’s largest economy. However, the extent and purpose of this control have sparked debate and, intriguingly, given rise to alternative theories that question the Fed’s true purpose, and the notion that it manages the economy for the benefit of all.

• The Fed’s primary economic management tool is its ability to adjust interest rates, thereby stimulating or slowing economic activity. But the question arises: who truly benefits from these adjustments? Is it the average citizen, or are there more powerful, hidden beneficiaries?

A growing number of voices, amplified by social media, suggest that the Fed may be acting in the interests of a wealthy minority. These theories propose that the Fed, in concert with other central banks, manipulates the money supply and interest rates to serve the interests of the rich and powerful. Some interesting facts seem to substantiate the levels of distrust for the Fed

• The New York Federal Reserve Bank, the most influential of the Fed’s regional banks, is controlled by a select few. A Freedom of Information Act request revealed that Citibank and JPMorgan Chase Bank held a combined total of over 70% of the New York Fed’s shares in 2018. This concentration of ownership has led some to question whether the Fed’s policies are truly in the public’s interest or if they are designed to benefit these banking giants.
• The Fed’s actions are part of a broader plan to expand government control over the economy. The recent push towards CBDCs is seen by some as a step towards a dystopian future where every transaction is monitored and controlled by the state.
• The Fed’s control over the M2 money supply, which includes cash, checking deposits, and easily convertible near money, is another point of contention. Some theorists argue that the Fed manipulates this supply to create economic cycles, benefiting those who can anticipate these changes.

These theories reflect a growing distrust of the financial system and its gatekeepers. The lack of transparency and the complexity of the Fed’s operations only serve to fuel these suspicions. As the saying goes, “Nothing is as it seems.”

The Crypto Connection

The world of crypto is not immune to these economic events.

• The tightening of financial conditions could make crypto assets more attractive. As traditional financial assets become less profitable, investors might turn to crypto as an alternative investment.
• On the other hand, the increased economic uncertainty could lead to increased volatility in the crypto market. Crypto assets are known for their volatility, and these economic events could exacerbate this.
• Finally, these events could impact the regulatory environment for crypto. As governments and central banks grapple with these economic challenges, they might impose new regulations on crypto assets, particularly when implementing CBDCs.

The total market capitalization of all cryptocurrencies, bolstered by significant growth since the middle of 2020, now represents over 2% of the worldwide M2 money supply. BTC on its own, constitutes 1% of this global monetary supply. Remaining altcoins collectively contribute approximately 1.2% to the global money supply.

The Final Verdict

The contraction of the M2 Money Supply and the inversion of the yield curve are significant economic events with far-reaching implications due to the fear of recessions.

They reflect the complexity of the global financial system, and the challenges of managing an economy in an uncertain world that has an incalculable number of moving parts and factors which contribute to the ups and downs of economic cycles.

While these events signal an economic slowdown or even a recession, they are not guaranteed predictors. Other economic indicators and events, including geopolitical tensions and government policies must also be considered.

The conspiracy theory angle, while not mainstream, highlights the mistrust and lack of understanding that many people have towards the financial system, whether these theories are valid or not.

Finally, these events will have significant implications for the crypto market, from asset prices to regulatory conditions.

Enjoyed this article?

1. Subscribe to The Reset for a daily newsletter where Crypto meets Macro and Geopolitics.
2. Follow us on Twitter for Tweets exposing the invisible forces reshaping our global financial system.