Will Permanent Caloric Restriction Extend or Ruin Your Life?
During WWI and WWII rationing was compulsory in many countries and consisted of a balanced and calorie restricted diet of around 2300 calories (the average child has 3000 calories a day now). Meat, cheese, butter, cooking fats and sugar were restricted and people ate a diet higher in carbohydrates and lower in fats (War diet: 32% fat, 55% carbs 13% protein). From 1911 to 1921 and again from 1940 to 1951, life expectancy increased by between six and seven years — more than double the rise in other decades. A 20% calorie restriction caused a 30% death rate reduction compared to pre-war times (Hindhede, 1920; Strøm et al, 1951). On the Japanese island of Okinawa, inhabitants naturally consumed up to 17% less calories than the rest of Japan, resulting in a markedly increased life expectancy (Willcox et al, 2007) but this was later lost due to Westernization of diet. In a two year human captivity Biosphere 2 experiment crew members remained in excellent health and sustained a high level of physical and mental activity throughout on just 1700 calories. Finally in the largest randomized controlled trial of caloric restriction in humans published in 2019 called CALERIE : those on a calorie restriction of 12% had better readings for cholesterol, blood pressure, insulin sensitivity, and measures of inflammation like C-reactive protein.
However malnutrition is a real danger. In the infamous 6 month “Minnesota Starvation Experiment,” extreme 40% CR with insufficient protein, vegetable and fruit intake and increased physical activity resulted in approx. 25% weight loss (2/3 fat, 1/5 fat-free mass), chronic fatigue, lower limb edema, severe emotional distress, depression, confusion, apathy, and libido loss.
What is Caloric Restriction?
Keeping things simple, caloric restriction (CR) means eating less for a long time…..if not, it would simply be a diet.
In 1935 McCay found that caloric restriction increased average rat lifespan from 483 days to 894 days. The usual reduction is around 20–50% (10–25% in humans) …..but short of without causing malnutrition.
Follow-ups studies show the effect holds in most mammals including rhesus monkeys and humans….so is it time to half those portion sizes?
Intermittent or Periodic Fasting: participants fast 5:2 or similar
Alternate Day Fasting: participants fast every other day
Time-Restricted Eating (TRE): eating during a short time window of 6–8 h
How Does Caloric Restriction Work?
Is it a direct effect or does it (simply) reduce comorbidities such as heart disease and cancer? Maybe both. Restriction seems to help obesity, CVDs, cancer incidence, and type 2 diabetes, among others (Longo et al, 2021) (Green et al, 2021)
Single-gene mutations targeting key nutrient-sensing pathways were discovered to extend lifespans of nematode worms, were discovered (link). Since then, many more mutations that affect longevity have been found in knockout and transgenic mouse models. Methylation drift has been observed in monkeys improving their biological age by 7 years (link)
When studied separately decreased protein (including methionine, branched-chain amino acids) might trump decreases in glucose/carbs and fats. Why? because in some studies focussed protein restriction and particularly methionine restriction, but not carbohydrate or lipid restriction, increases maximum longevity in rodents (Sanchez-Roman and Barja, 2013)
Decreased levels of methionine affect the metabolite S-adenosylmethionine (SAM). This can alter DNA and histone methylation.
Collectively, dietary restriction induces repair and recycling pathways, including autophagy, mitophagy, DNA repair and oxidant defence, and enhances stem cell function. As a result, cell senescence is downregulated and proteostasis is improved.
Recently several small molecules have been found to increase life span in mice, the most famous and promising of which could be considered to be resveratrol, rapamycin, increasing cellular levels of nicotinamide mononucleotide and metformin. All of these are seen as well-established pathways relevant to the human aging process (Campisi et al., 2019).
What are the benefits of Caloric Restriction?
But is Obesity the Key?
No doubt CR reduces obesity but what if the effects of CR are mediated simply by weight loss?
For example, mice caught from the wild have 3–4% body fat but mice in captivity have 10-22% body fat. All studies are conducted in calorically restricted laboratory mice which weigh actually significantly more than wild mice and have far higher body fat levels.
When weight gain during adulthood is measured as the area under the weight curve, the magnitude of life span extension afforded by CR is beautifully correlated to the weight gain in control mice fed ad lib. AUC is calculated as the average amount overweight multiplied by the period in months spent overweight. Could this be applied to humans?
Unfortunately there is little good evidence in humans. One modelling study found voluntary caloric restriction in humans increased life span by 8.4 years in men and 6.1 years in women when started at between 20 and 39 years of life (Grover et al., 2015). The caveat is that these improvements are only achieved against a control group of humans with a BMI above 35 (Grover et al., 2015).
But in the elderly, low weight is a significant risk, in fact (within the healthy range), a slight increase in BMI with age improves survival over staying skinny throughout life (Zheng et al., 2021).
Summary
Calorie restriction almost certainly works for anyone who is overweight, but is this really news? Ideally it will prolong not just survival but disease and disability free survival (figure).
But until there is a good study showing this works independently of changes in body weight then it is the same finding as showing that obesity is linked with accelerated mortality (and worse disease-free survival).
The final caveat is that it is tricky to do CR whilst maintaining a healthy mind and body (without losing fat-free mass). If you have found the trick for this, let me know.