Homepage
Sign in / Sign up

Fixing Economics

It is terribly depressing to be part of an intellectual discipline that so conspicuously failed to do its job from 2007 to the present…

Latest

Putting Economic Models in Their Place

Over at Project Syndicate: Putting Economic Models in Their Place:Among the voices calling these days for new — or at least substantially different — economic thinking http://ineteconomics.org is the very sharp Paul M. Romer http://paulromer.net/ of New York University, with his critique of what he calls “Mathiness” in modern economics http://paulromer.net/mathiness/. He seems, to me at least, to be very worried principally about two aspects of modern economic discourse.
Go to the profile of J. Bradford DeLong
J. Bradford DeLongJun 1, 2015

Thurday Musings on Macroeconomic Policy and “The Right”

Over at Equitable Growth I have two things I want to say this morning.First, Amtrak wifi really is c — -, isn’t it? ¶ Second, I think that Paul Krugman gets one thing wrong here, in his talk of “the right” and macroeconomic policy… ¶ There has not been one single right on macroeconomic policy since the Great Depression. There have been two. The lunatic right has been opposed to every single possible anti-recession policy except for union-busting, on the grounds that the market must be optimal: the market giveth, The market taketh away, blessed be the name of…
Go to the profile of J. Bradford DeLong
J. Bradford DeLongMay 21, 2015

The Theory of Growth and Inequality: Piketty, Zucman, Krusell, Smith, and “Mathiness”

Over at Equitable Growth Paul Romer inquired why I did not endorse his following Krusell and Smith (2014) in characterizing Piketty and…Piketty and Zucman as a canonical example of what Romer calls “mathiness”. Indeed, I think that, instead, it is Krusell and Smith (2014) that suffers from “mathiness” — people not in control of their models deploying algebra untethered to the real world in a manner that approaches gibberish. ¶ I wrote about this last summer, several times: ¶ This time, I replied to Paul Romer’s question with a Tweetstorm.
Go to the profile of J. Bradford DeLong
J. Bradford DeLongMay 19, 2015
Latest

Must-Read: There are, I think, six things that Paul Romer is objecting to, all gathered together…

Claiming that, as a matter of methodology, “good science” requires assumptions that bake my politics into the cake.
Go to the profile of J. Bradford DeLong
J. Bradford DeLongMay 17, 2015

Noah Smith, Paul Romer, “Mathiness”, and Baking the Politics into the Microfoundations…

Over at Equitable Growth: I see that over on the Twitter machine Noah Smith is engaging Paul Romer, in an attempt to get Paul to elucidate…
Go to the profile of J. Bradford DeLong
J. Bradford DeLongMay 16, 2015

Choose Your Heterodoxy: Farmer vs. Krugman

Over at Equitable Growth: Paul Krugman digs in in defense of old economic thinking: behavioral finance to explain bubbles, money illusion…
Go to the profile of J. Bradford DeLong
J. Bradford DeLongMay 13, 2015

Must-Must-Read: Matthew Yglesias: Brookings Did a Symposium

Matthew Yglesias: “Brookings did a symposium on the 40th anniversary of Arthur Okun’s famous book…
Go to the profile of J. Bradford DeLong
J. Bradford DeLongMay 13, 2015

Mark Bauerlein Has Written Another Book, So Let Me Hoist This from the Archives from Nine Years Ago

Lord, Enlighten Thou Our Enemies: Let us start with John Stuart Mill’s prayer:
Go to the profile of J. Bradford DeLong
J. Bradford DeLongMay 13, 2015
About
Fixing Economics
Fixing Economics

It is terribly depressing to be part of an intellectual discipline that so conspicuously failed to do its job from 2007 to the present…

More information

Followers
More stories →About Fixing Economics